[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Hello.

God is not reality. You're so naive.

The creator of the universe is not "reality?"

How naive is that!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Hello.

No, there are no rules. You do want you want to do. Or you don't. It really doesn't matter. It's an open religion. Sure, there's requirements to be an Atheist, but there's requirements for everything religion in order to be a part of it.

Atheism fails to meet every point of the definition of religion that you offered. Are you going to make up a new definition of religion now?

And it's not much of a "religion" if "you do what you want to do, or you don't".

Frankly, I don't think you're an atheist at all. At least not according to Wickedpedia:

Atheism, in a broad sense, is the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[2] Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.[3] Atheism is contrasted with theism,[4] which in its most general form is the belief that at least one deity exists.

A religion is a belief system. Atheism is the rejection of belief.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Hello.

Science most certainly does not "guess." They prove it with reality, they don't take utter bullshit from a book and believe it. They do experiments and prove the theories.

So everything a scientist says is true right?

What about the planet Vulcan?
Spontaneous generation?
The expanding earth?
Phlogiston theory?
Ether?
Martian canals?
Blank slate theory?
Phrenology?
Einsteins static universe?
Cold fusion?
Bucky balls?
Newtons law of Motion?
Pluto?
The periodic table of elements?

All of these have "respected scientists" who say they're wrong.

God is not reality. You're so naive.

Of course you can prove this?

Theories are all you have. Theories are all I have. You have no proof whatsoever that the Bible is true. There's no way to prove it.

Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?

And you still haven't. What else am I gonna say? Theories are all anyone has. You have no REAL proof that he exists, and I don't have much REAL proof he doesn't. But you still didn't acknowledge my arguments, most likely because you know they were right,

No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.

and you're reverting to immaturity like "DERP, WHAT A TYPICAL ATHEIST," and changing my username from "Can you justify that" to "Can I justify that." Really, how immature of you.

Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.

How old are you all? Age your god damn age.

I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?

Ridiculing me by changing my posts, my name, and to say my location is "worshiping monkies," REALLY? Grow up. Every one of you. None of you can actually give me a head-to-head argument about why they think I'm wrong.

Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.

Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory, and try to prove it wrong.

Which specific "theory" are you talking about?

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

The creator of the universe is not "reality?"

How naive is that!

You still think God is the creator of the universe?
How naive.

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

Atheism fails to meet every point of the definition of religion that you offered. Are you going to make up a new definition of religion now?

And it's not much of a "religion" if "you do what you want to do, or you don't".

Frankly, I don't think you're an atheist at all. At least not according to Wickedpedia:



A religion is a belief system. Atheism is the rejection of belief.

Again.
Religion: a widely believed-in subject, by a group of people. It can be used both ways. So said my Religion teacher. You must not be a very good "Reverend" if you can't even try to stretch the definition of Religion to see my point of view. I am an Atheist, and who cares about wickedpedia? Really? What does it have to do with anything?

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

So everything a scientist says is true right?

What about the planet Vulcan?
Spontaneous generation?
The expanding earth?
Phlogiston theory?
Ether?
Martian canals?
Blank slate theory?
Phrenology?
Einsteins static universe?
Cold fusion?
Bucky balls?
Newtons law of Motion?
Pluto?
The periodic table of elements?

All of these have "respected scientists" who say they're wrong.


Of course you can prove this?




Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?


No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.



Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.


I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?


Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.


Which specific "theory" are you talking about?

>So everything a scientist says is true right?
No. I said nothing of the sort.

>Of course you can prove this?
No, I can't. But you can't prove he is real, either. Atheists and Science have theories and such.
You have a book.

>Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?
Coincidences.

>No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.
No, I know exactly what I'm talking about. You could at least try to argue against them, they're well-thought-out. The least you could do is acknowledge them, and maybe try to prove them wrong. Until you do, I have the upper hand in saying if God exists or not.

>Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.
I've justified my points just fine. Time for you to try.

>I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?
Act your age* and that's off topic. It was most obviously a rhetorical question.

>Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.
Simply a matter of opinion. I am right, I know I am. Lots of people agree with me. Two of which have posted in this thread, and are both Atheist. One of which you banned for no apparent reason. Ask Moogitar if he agrees with everything I have said.

>Which specific "theory" are you talking about?
Look at who I was replying to. The theory that you didn't want to look at because of it being a theory. My theories to get around God not existing.

[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: Hello.

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

Atheism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

Disbelief: the act of disbelieving : mental rejection of something as untrue

From these three definitions, we can clearly see atheism is not a religion, as a religion is comprised of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As atheism is characterized by disbelief, it can be said that atheists have no beliefs. If atheism has no beliefs, then it cannot be a religion, as it has not satisfied the three conditions of what a religion is.

Anything else is just twisting language to suit your own purposes.

[Lisa H]

Re: Hello.

>So everything a scientist says is true right?
No. I said nothing of the sort.

>Of course you can prove this?
No, I can't. But you can't prove he is real, either. Atheists and Science have theories and such.
You have a book.

>Look around you, there's miracles happening every day! There are over 10,000 prophecies in the Bible that have come true. How do you explain that if the Bible is just a book?
Coincidences.

>No we don't accept your arguments, because you really don't know what you're talking about. Read the Bible, then read Hawkings, then get back to us.
No, I know exactly what I'm talking about. You could at least try to argue against them, they're well-thought-out. The least you could do is acknowledge them, and maybe try to prove them wrong. Until you do, I have the upper hand in saying if God exists or not.

>Well, you can't justify it. I've read your arguments, and they're very poor.
I've justified my points just fine. Time for you to try.

>I'll be 44 next month, how old are you?
Act your age* and that's off topic. It was most obviously a rhetorical question.

>Because you're not even right according to your own religion. Trust me, we've had some very well versed atheists on here and all you've done is throw a bunch of feces around like the ape you think you are.
Simply a matter of opinion. I am right, I know I am. Lots of people agree with me. Two of which have posted in this thread, and are both Atheist. One of which you banned for no apparent reason. Ask Moogitar if he agrees with everything I have said.

>Which specific "theory" are you talking about?
Look at who I was replying to. The theory that you didn't want to look at because of it being a theory. My theories to get around God not existing.

You idea of atheism is really misguided. You do not know what you are talking about. Whenever someone proves you wrong you have to make a derogatory remark. You made derogatory remark towards me by saying I am 12. Yet when someone says to you to act your age you complain it's off topic. You cannot have it both ways. So just admit you have been proven wrong and God exists.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Hello.

Science most certainly does not "guess." They prove it with reality, they don't take utter bullshit from a book and believe it. They do experiments and prove the theories.

God is not reality. You're so naive.


Theories are all you have. Theories are all I have. You have no proof whatsoever that the Bible is true. There's no way to prove it. And you still haven't. What else am I gonna say? Theories are all anyone has. You have no REAL proof that he exists, and I don't have much REAL proof he doesn't. But you still didn't acknowledge my arguments, most likely because you know they were right, and you're reverting to immaturity like "DERP, WHAT A TYPICAL ATHEIST," and changing my username from "Can you justify that" to "Can I justify that." Really, how immature of you. How old are you all? Age your god damn age. Ridiculing me by changing my posts, my name, and to say my location is "worshiping monkies," REALLY? Grow up. Every one of you. None of you can actually give me a head-to-head argument about why they think I'm wrong.

Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory, and try to prove it wrong.

Another epic fail!

You threw down the glove of the Gauntlet of Challenge® and failed at your own challenge. I analyzed your impeccable logic and post it below:

Science most certainly does not.....Theories are all I have........There's no way to prove it.........Just look at what I said, disregarding it's a theory............

You sure missed the mark!


By the way, I made no such edits to your account. It is not possible for me to do so. I am offended by your unfounded accusations. Though not surprised, based on all the other lies and back pedaling you do.

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: Hello.

One of the most debauched things this horrible person has written is that the only way he will believe the world is flat, is if he sees pictures of people falling off!

Doesn't he realize that people falling off would be the proof he needs to show the earth is a sphere?

Brothers and Sisters, it's obvious we are dealing with a looney-toon here!

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Hello.

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

Atheism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

Disbelief: the act of disbelieving : mental rejection of something as untrue

From these three definitions, we can clearly see atheism is not a religion, as a religion is comprised of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As atheism is characterized by disbelief, it can be said that atheists have no beliefs. If atheism has no beliefs, then it cannot be a religion, as it has not satisfied the three conditions of what a religion is.

Anything else is just twisting language to suit your own purposes.

I'm sorry to say this, but you're wrong. I know you're just a girl and cannot understand, but let me try and lay it out for you: Atheists worship monkeys and Charles Darwin.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Hello.

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

I was in the Zoo recently to see if monkeys can evolve into humans, which they didn't of course. These monkeys didn't seem like they would understand any explanation at all. I think hunting them down and killing them is the only thing they can be used for, although the Zoo keeper didn't seem to agree with me on that after I shot a few of them.

[Brother Barnabus]

Re: Hello.

!. If we're wrong (which we're not) then we're just worm food when we die.
2. If you're wrong then you burn in hell forever with Satan corn-holing you with his spiny member FOREVER.

Go ahead and roll those dice Skippy.

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

Maybe I can explain this in a way so even a monkey could understand.

From the Merriam-Webster dictionary:

Religion: a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices

Atheism: a disbelief in the existence of deity

Disbelief: the act of disbelieving : mental rejection of something as untrue

From these three definitions, we can clearly see atheism is not a religion, as a religion is comprised of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices. As atheism is characterized by disbelief, it can be said that atheists have no beliefs. If atheism has no beliefs, then it cannot be a religion, as it has not satisfied the three conditions of what a religion is.

Anything else is just twisting language to suit your own purposes.

If you weren't so blind, maybe you could be seeing what I had to say about this whole Atheism equalling a religion.

None of this is important anyway, what's the point of arguing over it? Take a real argument I laid out and prove THAT wrong. This has nothing to do with anything.

[Can I justify that]

Re: Hello.

You idea of atheism is really misguided. You do not know what you are talking about. Whenever someone proves you wrong you have to make a derogatory remark. You made derogatory remark towards me by saying I am 12. Yet when someone says to you to act your age you complain it's off topic. You cannot have it both ways. So just admit you have been proven wrong and God exists.

-I know exactly what I'm talking about, you are all just too stubborn to see my point of view and just revert to "Silly boy! God is reality!!! " and don't actually try to prove me wrong. Then you get other people to back up your worthless argument, saying "Oh you can't understand the bible because Satan is your father" or, "You're so naive, God most obviously created the universe."

-No one has proved me wrong yet, I made a derogatory remark because you do not understand any type of point I have been making about this, and you haven't even tried to. Like this. I wouldn't be having to explain all of this if you understood at all.

-No one has told me to act my age, they asked my age. Learn to read, really? That's not derogatory, that's pure worriedness from me to you since it's blatant that you can't understand context. I said it's irrelevant because what I said to him was rhetorical, and I wasn't purely asking his age.

-I have not been proven wrong. None of the points I've made have been proven wrong. The most I've been "proven wrong" ( if you didn't get it), is by you saying "OH THE BIBLE IS RIGHT YOU'RE WRONG THE BIBLE IS UTTER PROOF" though it could have been easily written without Jesus or God ever existing. It really could've.