[ExGay Alex]

Re: Physics Rules

You've evolved to Quarantine, Bob. We still have hope for you and I'll see you there.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Physics Rules

Hey, you can't submit a family photo as evidence! You and your brothers,yeh? I am guessing you are the second one on the left.

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Physics Rules

I give you this fair warning: My debate record is flawless. Second only to Wash O'Hanley due to the fact that he has had more debates than myself. Do you really think it wise to challenge me if you are a retard. This isn't like the debates you are used to in your special needs classes. You don't get a trophy in spite of your poor performance. I don't know if your kind are capable of coping with defeat when you're so accustomed to the "everyone is a winner" mentality taught to you by normal people who simply pity you.

*Hides under a rock*

Well, I never thought I'd see the day when one of these filthy godless disgusting pieces of unsaved trash actually heeded a warning. Now if only its vile pathetic miserable wretched atheist soul (do retards have souls?) would heed Jesus's warning. Do you think this means there is hope for it? Can a retard be Saved©?

I'm also conflicted as to rather or not I should count this as a victory considering it's a retard. It would be like winning an argument against my wife's polar bear fur coat on the virtues of animal hunting vs conservationist lies.

Regardless, I will be praying for this creature to see the Light of our Lord and Savior.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Physics Rules

What's happened to Mr. GeekPhysicist? I know he went and started posting rot about nuclear reactors in another thread (completely off topic, I thought) (unless he's decided he's some sort of transmogrified Nebuchad-nezzar) (but still completely irrelevant). I had a question about grasshoppers for him viz. how far away would a 5' 8" “carbon based unit” be if apparently only 1¾"?

Perhaps it is too hard for his slide rule.


__________________________________________________

Edit: a 6' vs 1" relationship would do, if that's easier
or even 6' vs ½"

[Remy Lebeau]

Re: Physics Rules

What's happened to Mr. GeekPhysicist? I know he went and started posting rot about nuclear reactors in another thread (completely off topic, I thought) (unless he's decided he's some sort of transmogrified Nebuchad-nezzar) (but still completely irrelevant). I had a question about grasshoppers for him viz. how far away would a 5' 8" “carbon based unit” be if apparently only 1¾"?

Perhaps it is too hard for his slide rule.


__________________________________________________

Edit: a 6' vs 1" relationship would do, if that's easier
or even 6' vs ½"

Atheists are used to challenging salad bar false christians. They think we are stupid, superstitious, delusional morons suffering under some mass psychosis. But when they face a True Christian™, they find that they are the idiots. Most, too prideful to simply back down in utter defeat, continue to dig their hole deep and deeper. The fact that this Geek, a retarded geek at that, has the sense to know when it is up against its betters is very surprising.

It can tuck tail and run from me, but not Jesus. Please join me in praying for its soul (if it has one). We need to save this creature before Jesus kills him.

[Mikey Rewlande]

Re: Physics Rules

I joined out of concern for your brains. I want to help you folks. Maybe if you guys are real christians, you will be able to convert me? Or, maybe I will be able to convert you to the true "religion" of physics. If you are unable to convert me, then that will be evidence (no proof) that you are not true christians. A real christian should be able to convert a scientific sinner like me right? I preach the word of physics which will never let you down. It always has been and always will be forever and ever, amen!

Praise be to the big bang!

Lady

Get with the program. Feesicks is the work of the bell wearers from the cult of Asda and you, my horny-headed loon are a poorly disguised trojan horse to woo the unsuspecting into the lair of the evil one

Smell some coffee chuchy face, the only reason we stay on this planet is because God made our feet sticky in an invisible kind of way

Stop talking with your ass and get some satsumas

[Reverand Stubber]

Re: Physics Rules

Lady

Get with the program. Feesicks is the work of the bell wearers from the cult of Asda and you, my horny-headed loon are a poorly disguised trojan horse to woo the unsuspecting into the lair of the evil one

Smell some coffee chuchy face, the only reason we stay on this planet is because God made our feet sticky in an invisible kind of way

Stop talking with your ass and get some satsumas

Those bell ringing, green coated Asda's and their 9p cans of baked beans are all bound for Hellfire. Praise be to God.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Physics Rules

Dear Lily,

My view of atheism was abandoned by weak, fearful atheists who cowered to public opinion. In an effort to be popular my ex-comrades adopted a pseudo-religious atheism filled with soft, disgusting notions about "human rights". Recently many of them even supported the public health care bill! This is a distortion of true atheism that would have Darwin rolling in his grave! How dare they disrupt the natural order and use the resources of the strong to prop up the weak. We will never evolve to the next level with sick thinking of this sort.

You could even say that "the Lord helps those who help themselves," eh?

In conclusion I urge you not to lump a true atheist together with these idiots who call themselves atheists while supporting an agenda of human rights, and continually pumping our resrouces in the wrong direction. We should be using our resources to help the strong gain even more advantage!

Every atheist I've ever spoken with says that atheism simply means that they do not believe God exists, and they enjoy eating babies and sacrificing women to Satan. They say that there are atheists with all sorts of political leanings.

Now, you say that's not true, that all atheists eat babies, sacrifice women to Satan, and are liberals.

Can you provide your evidence?

Bogdana,

You state;

Although some birth defects are uniformly lethal, disabled persons can succeed in life.

Succeed in life? Yes at a high cost to society.

True! Look at the cost to society of that Stephen Hawking being kept alive! How many people has he turned from God with his jibber-jabber?

As to your overall argument it can be boiled down to saying that by eliminating defects from the gene pool on a limited basis we still have those same traits carried in the balance of the population. To be sure this is true but if we help it along by eliminating some we statiscally improve the odds of achieving perfection, thus taking time off the evolutionary process. Would you not agree?

Please explain how your proposed attainment of "perfection" is consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

As to my plan, I have none. In the USA although we have become progressive enough to identify and permit the elimination of these traits, we still cling to the moralistic notion that everyone should have a choice in this matter. This originates from judeo-christian thinking, not from darwinism. It is my hope that someday we will become enlightened enough to make such elimination mandatory. Alas we have not reached that point.

Boob

I'm not surprised you have no plan. Surely you have an idea of how your desired "cleansing" could be carried out, however.

I know one atheist who thinks we should feed the most inferior to those who are capable of providing labor.

[rudolph]

Re: Physics Rules

Greetings to all of you small brained, non-scientific, carbon-based units.

I am a total geek, and all of this "god" chit chat is boring me to death and is non-scientific. Physics in the only true "religion". Truth can only be found through scientific principles. The scientific truth shall set you free.

Thank God, someone who agrees with me
Physics ftw!!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: Physics Rules

Thank God, someone who agrees with me
Physics ftw!!

If you want someone to agree with you, go join a science forum where you all can discuss your "scientific dogma" and debate which reason to hate God is the best.

[natewatson]

Re: Physics Rules

Much to do about nothing.

Physics may be a proven Science. Did anyone stop to thing that the our Savior gave us the ability to practice physics?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Physics Rules

Physics may be a proven Science. Did anyone stop to thing that the our Savior gave us the ability to practice physics?

He also gave you the "ability" to masturbate too. Does that mean you should do it?

[natewatson]

Re: Physics Rules

He also gave you the "ability" to masturbate too. Does that mean you should do it?

Great point, just wanted to bring that point to one who feels he is greater then God because he can practice Science.