X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    I don't want to twist scripture. To the extent I did so I apologize. Please forgive me. I just want to know what the scriptures are. Is it the Bible that King James published in 1611, or the KJV that is on your desk?

    Leave a comment:


  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Am I twisting scripture? I'm just trying to understand history.

    Dear ACatholic,

    You have received an infraction at The Landover Baptist Church Forum.

    Reason: Twisting Scripture to make it sound internally contradictory
    -------
    SHUT UP! SHUT UP! SHUT UP! You're trying to make God's Holy Word© seem just as made up as all those other religious books that ARE made up are!
    -------

    This infraction is worth 40 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

    Leave a comment:


  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    So God gave the apocrypha to King James and then he took it away? I'm confused.

    Leave a comment:


  • Capt. Aaron Portway
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by ACatholic View Post
    So God miracled your Bible through King James and your church took out the Apocrypha?
    NO! GOD DID!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Didymus Much
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by FreeFromBrains View Post
    Acute or oblique?
    I'm thinking obtuse (in more ways than one).

    Leave a comment:


  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    So God miracled your Bible through King James and your church took out the Apocrypha?

    Leave a comment:


  • Capt. Aaron Portway
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by ACatholic View Post
    I mean that the KJV 1611 has the apocrypha in it and your KJV does not have it. Whose Bible is inspired?
    No it doesn't. Quit saying that! God wrote the Bible through King James. God is in Heaven, so He miracled the One True Bible™ through the Godly King James. And don't say that other stuff was in there, because MY KJV1611 doesn't have it!

    Leave a comment:


  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    I mean that the KJV 1611 has the apocrypha in it and your KJV does not have it. Whose Bible is inspired?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr Laurence Niles
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by ACatholic View Post
    Your probably right. We shouldn't follow men even if they claim to follow Christ. That means that King James and whatever he said the word of God was is lying. Does that mean your pastor is lying too? Who is inspired? King James or you?
    What are you talking about?

    The KJV(1611) is inspired by God: does some look after you?

    YIC

    Leave a comment:


  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Your probably right. We shouldn't follow men even if they claim to follow Christ. That means that King James and whatever he said the word of God was is lying. Does that mean your pastor is lying too? Who is inspired? King James or you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dr Laurence Niles
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    while in reality they have their spiritual hands on the hips of a priest, whose hands are on the hips of a bishop, whose hands are on the the hips of a Cardinal, who in turn is following
    Who is in turn following a crying young boy; with a bleeding bottom.

    YIC

    Leave a comment:


  • Capt. Aaron Portway
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by ACatholic View Post
    I showed you a link that publishes the ORIGINAL KJV that was published in 1611 by King James himself. It has the Apocrypha in it. If your KJV doesn't have the Apocrypha in it, than doesn't that make your pastor the liar?
    Oh, so King James put his original Bible on the internets? Right!

    Look, you can't trust everything you read online, don't you know that? MY Bible is right here next to me, I can touch it, so forgive me if I believe what's right in front of me instead of some website page that some Catholic I don't even know linked me to on my computer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Professor Bessemer
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by ACatholic View Post
    St. Paul wrote that we should follow him as he follows Christ. All of God's Angles follow Christ and follow him alone. By following God's Angel's we follow Christ and Christ alone.
    No, that makes you a follower of a follower. How can you not see that? The Catholic Church is nothing more than a Conga line of fools, each one claiming to be following Jesus, while in reality they have their spiritual hands on the hips of a priest, whose hands are on the hips of a bishop, whose hands are on the the hips of a Cardinal, who in turn is following an elected Pope.

    To pretend you are following Jesus is the most dangerous of self delusions, as your eternal soul is in peril.

    Leave a comment:


  • FreeFromBrains
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by ACatholic View Post
    All of God's Angles.....
    Acute or oblique?

    Leave a comment:


  • ACatholic
    replied
    Re: Introduction

    Originally posted by Professor Bessemer View Post
    Now you are simply splitting hairs. Are you trying to tell me that the following is, as you say, showing respect and not prayer?
    St. Paul wrote that we should follow him as he follows Christ. All of God's Angles follow Christ and follow him alone. By following God's Angel's we follow Christ and Christ alone.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X