[little flip]

Re: Hello there!

It wasnt really a joke. I honestly wanted them to check out the forum.

[SimplyUnshiny]

Re: Hello there!

I'll be honest that is really hurtful. Do you realise that there are very sensitive, loving people here who only want to be able to fellowship with other True Christians™?

You trample over our most cherished beleifs. As a man I am pretty thick skinned but some of the forum have tender souls: are you aware the harm you do?

Would you walk into a church, temple or mucous and decry the heartfelt beleifs of those in church?

I'm sure you would not because deep down seem like a decent person crying out for Jesus to come inside you.

The hurtful things toy say about it being funny to watch us is unto hot golden streams of urininal fluid into the crying eyes of baby Jesus: no Christian would urinate into our Lords visage.

Would it be to much for you to open yourself to the blood of the Lamb and devote your whole life and eternal future to singing His praises for ever? It is such a small thing for His Grace to Save® you from His Righteous vengeance for rejecting His temporary sacrifice to God for your pre determined sin?

Please think about it.

God bless.

"are you aware the harm you do?"
Oh, that's laughable. Are you aware of the harm religion causes on a daily basis, and how much it's created in our history? It's done FAR more good than bad, and history proves that.

"Would you walk into a church, temple or mucous and decry the heartfelt beleifs of those in church?"

Have and do. A friend of mine is a pastor as Christ Fellowship, and I come in every Sunday to have debates. The only difference is, I'm not being a dick. I'm examining why they believe what they do, as a psychological experiment.

"I'm sure you would not because deep down seem like a decent person crying out for Jesus to come inside you. "

FOR THE LAST TIME, I'M NOT GAY.

"The hurtful things toy say about it being funny to watch us is unto hot golden streams of urinal fluid into the crying eyes of baby Jesus: no Christian would urinate into our Lords visage.

Would it be to much for you to open yourself to the blood of the Lamb and devote your whole life and eternal future to singing His praises for ever? It is such a small thing for His Grace to Save® you from His Righteous vengeance for rejecting His temporary sacrifice to God for your pre determined sin?"

Okay, at this point, I can't tell if you're being serious or not. I'm seriously laughing way too hard.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Hello there!

FOR THE LAST TIME, I'M NOT GAY.

That's what they all say. Please at least be honest about being a depraved anal sex maniac.

[SimplyUnshiny]

Re: Hello there!

That's what they all say. Please at least be honest about being a depraved anal sex maniac.

I think you just want everyone to be gay, so you can hate everyone.
Or, "save" them from their decision to be gay (which isn't even a choice).

Liking anal is different being gay. A lot of straight guys like ass play (I personally do, don't know anyone that does, but it has something to do with the prostate. Dunno much about it), but it doesn't mean they want some guy's dick in their ass.

[little flip]

Re: Hello there!

I never did get the point of anything anal related. Imean why would you want to put anything in there. First off it probably hurts like hell and second its honestly kind of.... Dirty.... Like hygenically. like I'm not trying to be offensive I'm just saying.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Hello there!

Liking anal is different being gay. A lot of straight guys like ass play (I personally do, don't know anyone that does, but it has something to do with the prostate. Dunno much about it), but it doesn't mean they want some guy's dick in their ass.

You can't just make things up because you like it that way.

Anal Sex is Gay Sex (Even if It's With A Woman!)

[SimplyUnshiny]

Re: Hello there!

You can't just make things up because you like it that way.

Anal Sex is Gay Sex (Even if It's With A Woman!)

Oh, you people remind me of middle schoolers. Can't use your brain, so you just resort to calling me a faggot, albeit in a less crude way.

[Animenut1]

Re: Hello there!

Okie dokie, so what Im getting here from the theist nuts is that you are all trying to violently and belligerently force your perceived understandings of the concepts of "love", "divinity", "hope", "faith", and "acceptance"...by using intolerance, spite, and delusion to demean, degrade, and offend any person who does not support your beliefs? You're hypocrites. Plain and simple. And what makes that even more morbid is that none of you have the ability to think for yourselves. All your responses are pre-programmed into your brains. Person does not believe in what you do? Spite him, curse him, and damn him to hell for being heathen. Person supports your beliefs? Praise him, love him, and favor him. And again, this is made even WORSE by the fact that your pre-programmed minds seem incapable of producing individual ideas of your own, leading to the most immense case of self-loving delusion conceivable by man. Shall I reverse this on your own religion, folks? Here comes the pain. Know how God supposedly "created everything"? That would include homosexuality. Now, maybe you follow that up with "When Eve ate the apple, that evil spawned the possibility of homosexuality". Okay, fine. But then why would God, who is supposedly all-knowing, all-powerful, and omnipresent, put such a dangerous item so easily within reach? And why even make that item to begin with if it was only going to be forbidden? Did he put it there to teach humans about temptation and "resisting evil"? Well, if he did, then he was humoring the possibility of temptation and evil, which, y'know, being all-powerful and such, he could have done away with or just not created to begin with. Now, also consider how, since he supposedly created everything, including all of how reality works, which included how the fruit of knowledge would work, why would he give such a forbidden fruit such an effect if he didn't want that to come about, even IF it was intended to teach about resisting evil (which he didn't need to create)? Why not just put a fake fruit tree there, and if his IMPERFECT (think about that, folks) creations chose to disobey him, punish them for having any free will and thinking for themselves. And again, while Im on the subject of "alleged evil", Satan is supposedly a "defect angel".........buuuuuuuuut God would have needed to created that defect angel in the first place. Why? To take the blame off himself if he happens to screw up, which he supposedly is incapable of doing? Or maybe God is just a sadistic asshole that got bored, created everything, created his "main antagonist", and waited for things to get interesting while he sits back in his recliner eating popcorn and twizzlers off his pot-belly watching all of creation like a poorly-written television sitcom.

Now, a slight detour. Anal sex. Ive seen it come up in this thread. Allow me to finger this subject. Feel free to laugh or sneer at that terrible pun. Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, there are pleasure receptors in the anus. I kid you not. It is a scientific fact of human anatomy. And again, I must point that out and cross-reference it to the alleged "fact" that God created everything. Let me reiterate that: EV-ER-Y-THI-NG! Narutally, that would include anal pleasure receptors. That is right. If God created everything, then he, by the belief of you theists, must have created humans with pleasure receptors in their anuses. In fact, that is where a mans "g-spot" is. Put your finger up deep enough, press on a certain spot, and he will ejaculate. Any doctor with a medical degree that wasn't taken from a box of Cracker Jacks could tell you that. Among the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany other examples, to consider anal sex evil would be the same as considering your God evil.

In an attempt to cause as much misery here as possible, allow me to mention a certain friend of mine that you all might take interest in. My friend, the minister. Yup, I, an agnostic individual, am close friends with a minister. Also, an exciting footnote is that this minister friend of mine happens to be homosexual. Incredibly homosexual. To such a point that he even APPEARS homosexual to strangers, which he will openly, seemingly proudly, admit to. Let me sum that up for you, friends: He is a homosexual minister. He has his license and everything. Ill let you drink that in for a moment and let the shock pass. Heres a few seconds for you (---------------------------------------------------------------------) All set? Okay. Then Ill continue. He is aware of my beliefs (or lack thereof) and does not mind at all. In fact, he has admitted to me several times that I am one of the few people he has ever truly, honestly fallen in love with. Not only does he not mind my lack of theist faith, you could say he is endeared by it since he calls me "The most mature, intelligent person he has ever met" which he has mentioned "is a result of me not letting faith obscure my logic like many others do". Keep in mind that this is a minister saying this. He has clearly told me that he finds it very frustrating that people have taken religion to such irrational extremes. In his exact words, "Religion is not a lifestyle, so it should not govern someones entire life. It tends to rob those people of individual thought and creativity. It is just a belief system, not unlike basic guidelines. I just wish less people would let it dominate their minds to the extent that they cant accept any new knowledge that doesn't comply with their own desires. Ive noticed many religious people letting that happen to themselves under the delusion that it is 'the will of God'. Im a minister and even I am not that bad. I feel honest concern for these people so lost that they have to rely on blind faith in a deity they so earnestly, willingly misunderstand."

[little flip]

Re: Hello there!

Okie dokie, so what Im getting here from the theist nuts is that you are all trying to violently and belligerently force your perceived understandings of the concepts of "love", "divinity", "hope", "faith", and "acceptance"...by using intolerance, spite, and delusion to demean, degrade, and offend any person who does not support your beliefs? You're hypocrites. Plain and simple. And what makes that even more morbid is that none of you have the ability to think for yourselves. All your responses are pre-programmed into your brains. Person does not believe in what you do? Spite him, curse him, and damn him to hell for being heathen. Person supports your beliefs? Praise him, love him, and favor him. And again, this is made even WORSE by the fact that your pre-programmed minds seem incapable of producing individual ideas of your own, leading to the most immense case of self-loving delusion conceivable by man. Shall I reverse this on your own religion, folks? Here comes the pain. Know how God supposedly "created everything"? That would include homosexuality. Now, maybe you follow that up with "When Eve ate the apple, that evil spawned the possibility of homosexuality". Okay, fine. But then why would God, who is supposedly all-knowing, all-powerful, and omnipresent, put such a dangerous item so easily within reach? And why even make that item to begin with if it was only going to be forbidden? Did he put it there to teach humans about temptation and "resisting evil"? Well, if he did, then he was humoring the possibility of temptation and evil, which, y'know, being all-powerful and such, he could have done away with or just not created to begin with. Now, also consider how, since he supposedly created everything, including all of how reality works, which included how the fruit of knowledge would work, why would he give such a forbidden fruit such an effect if he didn't want that to come about, even IF it was intended to teach about resisting evil (which he didn't need to create)? Why not just put a fake fruit tree there, and if his IMPERFECT (think about that, folks) creations chose to disobey him, punish them for having any free will and thinking for themselves. And again, while Im on the subject of "alleged evil", Satan is supposedly a "defect angel".........buuuuuuuuut God would have needed to created that defect angel in the first place. Why? To take the blame off himself if he happens to screw up, which he supposedly is incapable of doing? Or maybe God is just a sadistic asshole that got bored, created everything, created his "main antagonist", and waited for things to get interesting while he sits back in his recliner eating popcorn and twizzlers off his pot-belly watching all of creation like a poorly-written television sitcom.

Now, a slight detour. Anal sex. Ive seen it come up in this thread. Allow me to finger this subject. Feel free to laugh or sneer at that terrible pun. Whether you want to acknowledge it or not, there are pleasure receptors in the anus. I kid you not. It is a scientific fact of human anatomy. And again, I must point that out and cross-reference it to the alleged "fact" that God created everything. Let me reiterate that: EV-ER-Y-THI-NG! Narutally, that would include anal pleasure receptors. That is right. If God created everything, then he, by the belief of you theists, must have created humans with pleasure receptors in their anuses. In fact, that is where a mans "g-spot" is. Put your finger up deep enough, press on a certain spot, and he will ejaculate. Any doctor with a medical degree that wasn't taken from a box of Cracker Jacks could tell you that. Among the maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaany other examples, to consider anal sex evil would be the same as considering your God evil.

In an attempt to cause as much misery here as possible, allow me to mention a certain friend of mine that you all might take interest in. My friend, the minister. Yup, I, an agnostic individual, am close friends with a minister. Also, an exciting footnote is that this minister friend of mine happens to be homosexual. Incredibly homosexual. To such a point that he even APPEARS homosexual to strangers, which he will openly, seemingly proudly, admit to. Let me sum that up for you, friends: He is a homosexual minister. He has his license and everything. Ill let you drink that in for a moment and let the shock pass. Heres a few seconds for you (---------------------------------------------------------------------) All set? Okay. Then Ill continue. He is aware of my beliefs (or lack thereof) and does not mind at all. In fact, he has admitted to me several times that I am one of the few people he has ever truly, honestly fallen in love with. Not only does he not mind my lack of theist faith, you could say he is endeared by it since he calls me "The most mature, intelligent person he has ever met" which he has mentioned "is a result of me not letting faith obscure my logic like many others do". Keep in mind that this is a minister saying this. He has clearly told me that he finds it very frustrating that people have taken religion to such irrational extremes. In his exact words, "Religion is not a lifestyle, so it should not govern someones entire life. It tends to rob those people of individual thought and creativity. It is just a belief system, not unlike basic guidelines. I just wish less people would let it dominate their minds to the extent that they cant accept any new knowledge that doesn't comply with their own desires. Ive noticed many religious people letting that happen to themselves under the delusion that it is 'the will of God'. Im a minister and even I am not that bad. I feel honest concern for these people so lost that they have to rely on blind faith in a deity they so earnestly, willingly misunderstand."

Well I cant argue with that..... Mostly because its 3 pages long!!!!

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Hello there!

force your perceived understandings of the concepts of "love", "divinity", "hope", "faith", and "acceptance"...by using intolerance, spite, and delusion to demean, degrade, and offend

OK, this is where you already went totally wrong. It's not "our" anything.
We are only about His consepts and using His word, the Bible.

It seem like you have a problem with God, not with us.

[Fallenday]

Re: Hello there!

Wow....

[Animenut1]

Re: Hello there!

OK, this is where you already went totally wrong. It's not "our" anything.
We are only about His consepts and using His word, the Bible.

It seem like you have a problem with God, not with us.

So...What you're saying is that I have something against God, not you, but you are the ones acting out His wishes on His behalf ("We are only about His consepts and using His word, the Bible."). Sorry to break it to you, but that's entirely contradictory. Despite how God doesn't actually do anything, as you yourself pointed out claiming to be pseudo-messengers projecting His will through yourselves, you say I have a problem with the deity rather than the tools it uses in its place to accomplishes its goals. You're saying my problem isn't with the puppets, but the puppet-master. Buuuuuuuuut...Unlike a wooden toy, humans are sentient, self-aware creatures. Unlike a puppet-master controlling toys that lack sentience, giving good reason to blame the puppet-master while calling the puppet innocent, THIS scenario uses live, self-aware puppets, giving ample reason to put blame on the puppets. Or are you admitting to being mindless? That's the only way to avoid blame. Otherwise you're just cowardly delegating.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Hello there!

Okie dokie, so what Im getting here.....
Now, a slight detour. Anal sex. .......

In an attempt ...."

No friend, no Christian wants to 'have relations' with you. Homosexualness is a filthy, disgusting sin and only people who refuse the Perfection of Christ would partake in it.

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Hello there!

So...What you're saying is that I have something against God.

What I am saying is that we follow the word of God, the Bible. You seem to get upset about the fact. Why is that?

[Animenut1]

Re: Hello there!

No friend, no Christian wants to 'have relations' with you. Homosexualness is a filthy, disgusting sin and only people who refuse the Perfection of Christ would partake in it.

Okay, but can you PROVE that with legitimate, solid, fact, not just conjecture based on faith and belief? If I stab myself in the foot, the proof that I did is the blood on the knife and the pain and hole in my foot, not the "belief" that I did it. So where is your undeniable PROOF that homosexuality is a sin? And since this request requires facts, data and statistics must be available. "The word of God" is not a valid, sustainable, solid bit of proof.

P.S. Are you calling my friend a liar just because his choice does not agree with your views? Or are you saying he is "not allowed" to be Christian if he is homosexual? Considering the fact that he is a certified minister and you (Im assuming) are not, I would say he has more "authority" to make that classification than you do.