Originally posted by handmaiden
View Post

I'm beginning to have my doubts about this "Santa" – isn't it foreign for saint? The Bible enables us to know what a saint is (every true Christian and certain believers predating Christ such as Deborah, Jephthah, Daniel and so on) but its use as a title, akin to Mister [Mr Smith] or Viscount [Vis. Melbourne], suggests that believers may exist who are not saints.
.
a Smith | a Viscount |
. ![]() | . ![]() |
|---|
.
Comparisons between demonic possession, a very real threat acknowledged by Jesus, and so-called tree huggers are obvious – but what about other plants? Santa's picture had the alarm bells ringing! A detailed analysis was called for: it didn't take long and here are the results.
.
RGB values as sampled | sample from illustration | sample from nature | a link to the original photograph |
| LEFT | . ![]() #E64A10 | . ![]() #E84312 | https://www.23hq.com/23666/149884275_1b4...standard.jpg |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIDDLE | . ![]() #DF5F3D | . ![]() #DF5D38 | https://www.23hq.com/23666/149884277_b05...standard.jpg |
| LOWER RIGHT | . ![]() #B5AC46 | . ![]() #B9AB45 | https://www.23hq.com/23666/149886289_09c...standard.jpg |
| UPPER RIGHT | . ![]() #E2C881 | . ![]() #E2CC86 | https://www.23hq.com/23666/149884283_e2c...standard.jpg |
To verify the analysis, a comparison between RGB values sampled from Santa's post and those from photographs from nature, together with links to the photographs, is provided. The similarity is so remarkable—even if it were not immediately apparent—that his agenda is revealed: alkaloids this Christmas and just look at them! All ready for admixture into a fruit punch to be glugged down by anyone seeking to deny Christ.
• LEFT Very clearly a tub of chopped up toadstools, steeped according to Santa's recipe or blanched or whatever he does with them, right there on the table. Does he think Christians are stupid?
• MIDDLE It may look like wedges of stonebaked bread, very fashionable I guess. But no guesswork is required to identify what the "bread" is made from! A specially selected batch of rye with the fruiting heads of ergot, processed in some way, presented in its little basket already to go in.
• LOWER RIGHT Now this one is particularly blatant. It's what first alerted me to Santa's ploy, having its roots deep in paganism as requested by degenerates everywhere. There are many cactus juices to choose from but the simplest RGB comparison tells us this is not a plant recommended for consumption in any Christian home.
• UPPER RIGHT Here again, I was struck by the shape of this ingredient and had no trouble finding the fungus concerned. The RGB values are averaged over sampled details and compared with Santa's picture, as if any comparison were needed, just to make sure. Some may say we can eat anything, any plant at least, which might be true. But we also have words of caution in The Bible, tailored to the festive season, just as God knew would persist, even into The Last Days.
Isaiah 29:9 Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink.
I Corinthians 10:21-23 Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of devils. Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he? All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not.












Yes, it would be possible to "look something up on the interwebs" but I don't do that as a rule, preferring to ask someone and just remember what they said for future reference. (If the topic came up again, I could compare a second interlocutor's remarks and build up a body of precedent in a sort of mental archive.) Mostly, perhaps like yourself, I just request sources I'm already familiar with for links – anyway, is
, then I am sure that the enjoyment of beef will become more to his liking:
. Mind you, the only exception that is possible is when our beloved President Donald J. Trump dances to their music. Then — and only then — is it permissible for the ears of
people!
of
"
Comment