Tweet
Re: No scientific consensus on Global Warming: still tied at 9,136 to 1
In the 90s, they talked about a "hole" in something they called the "ozone layer." Then the hole got plugged up or something and in the 00s "global warming" was all the rage. When the continued existence of winter confounded their efforts to hoodwink Christians, the scientists jettisoned that term as a failure. The more vague "climate change" became their alarmist buzzword in the 10s. COVID has taken over from the climate as the scientific community's hoax célèbre in the 20s, but I'm sure they'll cook up some new absurd variation on that tired theme, probably something to do with ocean levels. Yawn.
In the 90s, they talked about a "hole" in something they called the "ozone layer." Then the hole got plugged up or something and in the 00s "global warming" was all the rage. When the continued existence of winter confounded their efforts to hoodwink Christians, the scientists jettisoned that term as a failure. The more vague "climate change" became their alarmist buzzword in the 10s. COVID has taken over from the climate as the scientific community's hoax célèbre in the 20s, but I'm sure they'll cook up some new absurd variation on that tired theme, probably something to do with ocean levels. Yawn.
Comment