Tweet
Google computers tag black people as gorillas: What does this mean for Creation Science?
Romans 9:1
I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
One of the key concepts of Creation Science and Flood Geology is to classify the Created kinds (Genesis 1:24). The human mind is, however, tainted by sin, and until now only the most pious Creation Scientists have been able to make reliable classification schemes between kinds. The issue of man vs. animal was never significant until Mr. Darwin and his heresies began to corrupt the minds of promising youths with the ideas of common descent and millions of years. This has led to the situation, where the only objective unprejudiced minds (apart from ours) are those of computers. They only tell what they perceive and see. They cannot be bribed or corrupted by wishful thinking. And when they do their job, outrage ensues.
Galatians 4:16
Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
Thus, the Google computers DID their job and arranged some photos according to the subject matter. This is what these programs found out:
Google’s image recognition algorithm is labelling photos of black people as gorillas and putting them into a special album. The automatic recognition software is intended to spot characteristics of photos and sort them together — so that all pictures of cars in a person’s library can be found in one place, for instance. But the tool seems to be identifying black people as animals.The problem was spotted by Jacky Alcine, who said that pictures taken with a friend were being sorted into the gorilla tag.
- The most advanced computer program ever examines some photos.
- These programs see some faces and after the sophisticated algorithm does its job it recognizes gorillas.
- Without prejudice or preconceptions, the program does the job that Creation Scientists have been trying to do for years: distinguishing between Created Kinds at first glance.
This was, however, immediately dismissed.
His tweets triggered a response from Yonatan Zunger, chief architect of social at Google, who said programmers were working on a fix to the problem. He said: 'Thank you for telling us so quickly. Sheesh. High on my list of bugs you *never* want to see happen. Shudder.' However, even after a fix had been issued Mr Alcine reported two photos were still showing up under the terms gorilla and gorillas. Mr Zunger later said that Google had turned off the ability for photographs to be grouped under that label to stop the problem.
1. Apes are real. They were present as Ark kinds soon after the flood and used as merchandise. Gorillas are apes, thus, they are real.
2 Chronicles 9:21
For the king's ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.
For the king's ships went to Tarshish with the servants of Huram: every three years once came the ships of Tarshish bringing gold, and silver, ivory, and apes, and peacocks.
2. There are some characteristics of gorillas that we should look for in people. In addition to facial features, these could be used as supplementary tools for classification. For instance, gorillas eat their own excrement.
. Gorillas are also rude.
3. Many animals can understand simple utterances (for, instance, dogs follow orders), so language and the use of it are unreliable.
4. We cannot trust secular scientists ever again. They suppress evidence and if they look at the evidence, they fail to see it because they have chosen Satan. Jesus sees this and tricks these people deeper into the pits of self-deception and damnation.
Isaiah 66:4
I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not.
2 Thessalonians 2:11
And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
PERSPECTIVES
1. We must examine this new issue in detail and not be intimidated by voices that simply dismiss this without conducting careful scientific studies. This is, however, very typical of secular biologists who only look for what they want to find and are deeply committed to their biases. This also reconfirms earlier studies of Landover Baptist Church.
2. The question of interbreeding is most fascinating. It offers us an alternative hypothesis based on genetic entropy. If some human populations (because of heavy sins) have been exposed to accelerated genetic deterioration after the Flood, we could expect to see many sign of degeneration, such as skin problems including pigmentation, loss of human facial features. etc.
3. All this can also explain why the evil lotionary theory was invented in the first place. It is extremely difficult to look at populations objectively and determine the boundary of man vs. animal that was clear and outside debate until the Fall, the Flood and the subsequent microevolution within Created Kinds due to Genetic Entropy into the less-perfect forms that we see now in contrast to the original glorious Kinds depicted in Genesis 1 (such as the Behemoth and the creeping things).
2. The question of interbreeding is most fascinating. It offers us an alternative hypothesis based on genetic entropy. If some human populations (because of heavy sins) have been exposed to accelerated genetic deterioration after the Flood, we could expect to see many sign of degeneration, such as skin problems including pigmentation, loss of human facial features. etc.
3. All this can also explain why the evil lotionary theory was invented in the first place. It is extremely difficult to look at populations objectively and determine the boundary of man vs. animal that was clear and outside debate until the Fall, the Flood and the subsequent microevolution within Created Kinds due to Genetic Entropy into the less-perfect forms that we see now in contrast to the original glorious Kinds depicted in Genesis 1 (such as the Behemoth and the creeping things).
As we can see, many commonly apelike features can be observed in the regular infantry fighting man of any army. The Truth™ about this is to be determined. Only Creation Scientists can do that, not the Google personnel, nor the outraged citizens. The Truth™ of Jesus is too important to be left in their hands.
Yours in Christ,
Elmer
.
. 
!
Comment