X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Coronavirus Compromise: Women Should Stay at Home

    In this time of national crisis, it is unfortunate that our nation is so divided along political lines. This is completely the fault of the Democrat party, which insists on listening to the dubious advice of doctors and scientists rather than to the wise words of the greatest President this country has ever known. Nevertheless, in the interest of compromise, I humbly suggest that we should resolve our differences by keeping women under stay at home orders while we allow men to carry on with their work and normal activities.

    After all, this is the way God wants it:

    I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully. 1 Timothy 5:14
    The Christian Right: The Only Right Way to Be a Christian!

  • #2
    Re: Coronavirus Compromise: Women Should Stay at Home

    Originally posted by WWJDnow View Post
    Nevertheless, in the interest of compromise, I humbly suggest that we should resolve our differences by keeping women under stay at home orders while we allow men to carry on with their work and normal activities.
    After all, this is the way God wants it:

    A very practical and workable solution, Brother Dnow. Our economy could make a smooth transition if all women simply resigned from their jobs and unemployed men then stepped in.
    Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Coronavirus Compromise: Women Should Stay at Home

      What about services provided for free? Obviously for a given population if twice the number decide to work, since there are no extra people to generate twice the demand, the real income per job will halve. It's a self fulfilling prophecy "that everyone will be better provided for in that case" because now a single household DOES require two incomes to maintain its standard.

      Since free services never earned anything to start with would continuing on deprive anyone of employment?

      ..confused

      Comment

      Working...
      X