[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by TwinkBoy

Hmmm...ELLO LOVES!!

The great and infamous NOAH sodomized by his son? My O My! And IF he was then that means that everyone on this earth today is descended from a SODOMITE because according to your Bible everyone was killed on earth except Noah the Sodomite and his Sodomite Clan.

Now consider all this CAREFULLY TC's because there just MIGHT be quite a BIG REVELATION for all of you! And don't forget to bless sweet Ham LMAO.

Listen Twink, a sordid revelation like this is not time for your little games, your jokes about "For a Jew Noah really likes pork since he was packing Ham on the Ark." No Twink, that is not acceptable in this forum.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Sister Talitha

You are REALLY confusing me now.

So, what you are saying is that Ham was not trying to Sodomise his father, but was missing his Mother so much he was trying to turn Noah into a Woman?

That's just plain dumb!!

These mistakes do happen Sister Talitha. The post flood period must have been a very confusing time and with everyone wearing long tunics these mistakes happen. Though they are not excusable.

There is a theory that Ham came upon Noah drunk and unconscious in his tent. Ham wasn't sure whether it was Noah or Ham's mother. Done some uncovering to make sure and that was when Satan entered Ham and told them "just by looking at your Dad's bear butt you've effectively rump rangered him so you mind as well go all the way" and Ham listened.

That Ham really meant to rape his own mother doesn’t let Ham off the hook.

[Talitha]

Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe

These mistakes do happen Sister Talitha. The post flood period must have been a very confusing time and with everyone wearing long tunics these mistakes happen. Though they are not excusable.

There is a theory that Ham came upon Noah drunk and unconscious in his tent. Ham wasn't sure whether it was Noah or Ham's mother. Done some uncovering to make sure and that was when Satan entered Ham and told them "just by looking at your Dad's bear butt you've effectively rump rangered him so you mind as well go all the way" and Ham listened.

That Ham really meant to rape his own mother doesn’t let Ham off the hook.

Wow Bobby Joe!! You're Manly wisdom has no bounds.
That's the very reason why men hold such a higher place within God's Kingdom.
I shall make my Negra Cook bake some Tiffin Cake in your honor.

I knew The Devil had to get in there somewhere

That's a very good warning to all you wanna-be false Christians. The Devil is OUT THERE and if you are not careful you'll be Sodomising everything in sight.

Give Loving Donations to Landover, join our Church and you too could feel the Loving hand of Jesus©.
Praise®

[shol'va]

Originally Posted by Brother Love

Heathen WITCH the good Lord IS going to get you for that one! How dare you IN-SIN-U-WAIT that Noah and Ham were degenerates and the wife too! As my good friend, the GODLY Rev. Pat Robertson likes to say, "I might have to tolerate other people BUT I DON'T have to tolerate the SPIRIT OF THE ANTICHRIST and I won't!"

PRAISE THE LORD!
Burn Witch, BURN!!!!!!!!!

HAHAHAHA BURN ALL WITCHES HAHAHA I AM A 40 YEAR OLD NERD WHO SITS ON HIS COMPUTER ALLL DAY AND PRETENDS TO BE GODLY HAHAHAHA KILL THE HEATHENS!!!!

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by shol'va

Friend,

Do you think Landover is some kind of humor site, were we sit around, make fun of things and make strange posts? Please keep your posts on topic and with the level of seriousness this subject deserves.

[shol'va]

Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe

Friend,

Do you think Landover is some kind of humor site, were we sit around, make fun of things and make strange posts? Please keep your posts on topic and with the level of seriousness this subject deserves.

Well, at least you have the courtesy to reply politely. I was just making fun of Brother Love's little tantrum.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by shol'va

Well, at least you have the courtesy to reply politely. I was just making fun of Brother Love's little tantrum.

No problem. We understand the failings of the unsaved. It can not be helped that Jesus loves us more than He loves you friend.

[OnYourKnees]

Originally Posted by shol'va

Well, at least you have the courtesy to reply politely. I was just making fun of Brother Love's little tantrum.

Brother Love posts exactly the way he speaks, as you can hear on his website; unfortunately, the speaking style of a fire-and-brimstone revivalist preacher doesn't always translate well into the written word.

He's much better in person; he brought his tent through Salem a few years back, and drew an impressive crowd!

[Romeo Rovagnati]

Unfortunately, it appears very likely that Noah was sodomized. We all know that his descendants tends to be rapists towards white, but i would never have guessed that the first black actually raped his own father.

Some would argue that it was just Caanan to be cursed, therefore, since the Caananite were exterminated when the Israelites took their land. However, our Church Fathers seems to disagree:

Originally Posted by St. Ambrose

Did it not come first from Noah who, perceiving that his son Ham had foolishly derided the nakedness of his father, cursed him in these words, Cursed be Ham, a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren, and set his brethren as lords over him, seeing that they had wisely deemed their fathers old age worthy of honor?

Here, St. Ambrose is not referring to Caanan, but to his father Ham himself:

Originally Posted by St. John Chrysostom

Whence did the sons of Noah obtain a good report? was it not because they vehemently loved their father, and did not endure to see his exposure? And whence was the other cursed? was it not from not loving him?

St. John Chrysostom confirms that Ham, not only clearly sodomized Noah, but even enjoyed it!


Now, let's hear more interpretations:

Originally Posted by Vincent of Lerins

This condemnation, indeed, seems to have been providentially promulgated as though with a special view to the fraud of those who, contriving to dress up a heresy under a name other than its own, get hold often of the works of some ancient writer, not very clearly expressed, which, owing to the very obscurity of their own doctrine, have the appearance of agreeing with it, so that they get the credit of being neither the first nor the only persons who have held it. This wickedness of theirs, in my judgment, is doubly hateful: first, because they are not afraid to invite others to drink of the poison of heresy; and secondly, because with profane breath, as though fanning smouldering embers into flame, they blow upon the memory of each holy man, and spread an evil report of what ought to be buried in silence by bringing it again under notice, thus treading in the footsteps of their father Ham, who not only forebore to cover the nakedness of the venerable Noah, but told it to the others that they might laugh at it, offending thereby so grievously against the duty of filial piety, that even his descendants were involved with him in the curse which he drew down, widely differing from those blessed brothers of his, who would neither pollute their own eyes by looking upon the nakedness of their revered father, nor would suffer others to do so, but went backwards, as the Scripture says, and covered him, that is, they neither approved nor betrayed the fault of the holy man, for which cause they were rewarded with a benediction on themselves and their posterity.

This letter reveals that Ham managed to bring mockery to his owns sons by laughting at what he did. Does this confirms that Noah had very small gentials?

Originally Posted by St. Augustine

Now this Cush, father of the giant Nimrod, is the first-named among the sons of Ham, to whom five sons and two grandsons are ascribed. But he either begot this giant after his grandsons were born, or, which is more credible, Scripture speaks of him separately on account of his eminence; for mention is also made of his kingdom, which began with that magnificent city Babylon, and the other places, whether cities or districts, mentioned along with it.

Congratulations Ham, one of your Grandson was the first Antichrist in the (Biblical) History of Mankind. You pretty much caused so much trouble with your Curse.


Some Hamites are indeed tall, therefore they correspond to the giants described. Pheraps, Goliath was also a black man?

Originally Posted by St. Augustine

Then it returns again to Canaan, in whose person Ham was cursed; and his eleven sons are named. Then the territories they occupied, and some of the cities, are named. And thus, if we count sons and grandsons, there are thirty-one of Ham's descendants registered.

Pretty much even St. Augustine confirms in his City of God that not just Caanan and his descendants, even his father was cursed. It makes me wonder how did his descendants nowdays live in mud huts when in biblical times they built Jerusalem.


Now, there are legends that even the Unholy Talmud confirms that the curse of Ham was caused by rape. Unfortunately i'm too busy to learn the Hebrew language, therefore i don't bother.


So, we have:

• Homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22)
• Incest (Leviticus 20:17)
• Seeying a relative naked (Leviticus 18:6)
• Not honouring his Father (Matthew 15:4)

In total: 4 sins! We know that Abraham and Lot practiced incest, and that Moses was born from an incest, but at least they were all reproductive acts! This instead is more vile, since it is the sin of Sodomy! I cannot judge if Ham is saved or not, since there is no witnessing of him repenting from his sins.


The Papacy did everything he could to abolish Slavery. Unfortunately, he was only able to abolish "Physichal slavery" not "Spiritual slavery". Therefore, the Hamites are always forced to be slaves, no matter what they do. However, they can still be saved if they work hard and follow Jesus. One of the people who attend my Church has an Hamite woman as an housemaiden that takes care for his children, for example.

[Skelter_floof]

Originally Posted by TwinkBoy

Hmmm...ELLO LOVES!!

The great and infamous NOAH sodomized by his son? My O My! And IF he was then that means that everyone on this earth today is descended from a SODOMITE because according to your Bible everyone was killed on earth except Noah the Sodomite and his Sodomite Clan.

Now consider all this CAREFULLY TC's because there just MIGHT be quite a BIG REVELATION for all of you! And don't forget to bless sweet Ham LMAO.

So according to sources, we all have 'the big gae'. Sounds about right. There's a lot of odd stuff in the bible, but I've never heard anything like that from another place before...

[Skelter_floof]

Originally Posted by shol'va

HAHAHAHA BURN ALL WITCHES HAHAHA I AM A 40 YEAR OLD NERD WHO SITS ON HIS COMPUTER ALLL DAY AND PRETENDS TO BE GODLY HAHAHAHA KILL THE HEATHENS!!!!

"We do a little crusading, what can I say." It's dirty work, but someone has to do it. There will always be crusaders and things to crusade against. It's kind of a thing that just happens in this odd little world we all share.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Originally Posted by Romeo Rovagnati

John Chrysostom confirms that Ham, not only clearly sodomized Noah, but even enjoyed it!

This letter reveals that Ham managed to bring mockery to his owns sons by laughting at what he did.
So, we have:

• Homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22)
• Incest (Leviticus 20:17)
• Seeying a relative naked (Leviticus 18:6)
• Not honouring his Father (Matthew 15:4)

In total: 4 sins! We know that Abraham and Lot practiced incest, and that Moses was born from an incest, but at least they were all reproductive acts!

You Catholics are off the rails when it comes to reading the Bible. But there is something we can agree on, we Christians have been abused since day one. Eve caused us to sin. Then men started sinning and even sinning against each other. That Noah was a victim of sodomy tells us we have always had to endure abuse. This will continue until we put in place a government that punishes sin.

[Dennis Lukes]

Originally Posted by Johny Joe Hold

You Catholics are off the rails when it comes to reading the Bible.

To be fair, at least he actually seems to have been reading it, rare for a papist. I think this is the first time he's cited the word of God in addition to the heretical writings of damned popes and saints.