X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

    Even though Brother Deem is totally off-base with his heretical Old Earth Creationism beliefs, he is right on the money about the following:

    Why Sex With Robots is Always Wrong: The Impending Demise of the Human Species




    Sometime in the late 2030's:
    Brian was 28 when he bought his first FACA (female anatomically correct android). They had been around since the early 2020's, but had been much too expensive to personally own. Now that the price had dropped to around $80,000, Brian had thought that he would buy a car every 8-10 years, instead of every 4-5 years and new FACA in between.

    Besides, the new FACAs were much more realistic than the old ones, since the technology had developed to provide cooling to all the internal computers and simultaneously make the robot warm to the touch by providing fluidics through the computers to dissipate heat through a network of "capillaries" located just under the "skin."

    Yes, the new models were friendly and warm. Brian was introduced to FACAs in college, where the fraternities would rent a FACA during the weekends and go on binges of drinking and sex. The rental prices were rather high at first, since these FACAs were million-dollar machines, but eventually the supply caught up with demand and almost everybody could afford to rent or buy one.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Initially, all FACA had been designed as young adult versions of their human counterparts. However, emboldened by their sweeping victories in the courts, FACA were soon designed as young girls and boys, and even animals, to meet every possible sexual perversion of their intended markets. Even those men who bought the adult FACA versions found their attitudes changing, since there were no consequences to anything they did with their FACA. After all, it didn't matter if you swore at your FACA or spoke harshly to it, since it always did exactly what you wanted.

    Over time, men who owned FACA became more and more rude to their human counterparts as the degradation of society accelerated. Men who owned a FACA disdained the company of real women, with all their incessant demands and mood swings. The sexual revolution was complete and we were all the victims.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Yes, the above scenario should bother you, whether you are a Christian or an atheist. Before you say that the scenario above is unlikely, I would like for you to consider some facts that led me to write the story and come to the belief that it is entirely possible that our societies could be headed in that direction. First, there are no legal barriers to the scenario playing out in full.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The idea that sex with robots will radically effect the attitudes of practitioners also comes from studies of those involved with pornography on a regular basis. Studies have found that viewing of pornography results in:

    1. increased callousness toward women
    2. trivialization of rape as a criminal offense
    3. distorted perceptions about sexuality
    4. increased appetite for more deviant and bizarre types of pornography (escalation and addiction)
    5. devaluation of monogamy
    6. decreased satisfaction with a partner’s sexual performance, affection, and physical appearance
    7. doubts about the value of marriage
    8. decreased desire to have children
    9. viewing non-monogamous relationships as normal and natural behavior.

    Pornography portrays an unrealistic view of relationships and persistent viewing enforces those views. An android that always does what it's told, despite bad behavior, enforces that behavior. In real relationships, bad behavior is thwarted through unpleasant consequences related to that behavior. With pornography and android sex, there are no consequences, so bad behavior goes unpunished, reinforcing the behavior.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	27.7 KB
ID:	1929073


    To all of us True Christians™, the above may seem obvious, but I made this post for the atheists and false Christians that come here for our Godly wisdom and teaching. Sex is for procreation ONLY. Until God creates a robot that can bear future soldiers for Christ, no True Christians™ man will EVER put his tallywhacker into a robots sinful cooter. Amen!
    Last edited by Capt. Aaron Portway; 04-20-2013, 02:28 PM. Reason: Fixed bad image link
    sigpic


    Winging our Way Across the World for The Lord!



    God Bless John Boehner and God Bless the Grand Old Party!



    Barack Hussein Obama is not My President!!!

  • #2
    Re: The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

    God hates robots!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

      Originally posted by Ex-Viking View Post
      God hates robots!
      If God hated all robots, there wouldn't be any robots. Just because we don't why He let scientists make these sexbots, that doesn't mean He doesn't have a reason. My guess would be that He created them as a temptation for perverts so that they could damn themselves by fornicating with their synthetic sex organs.
      sigpic


      Winging our Way Across the World for The Lord!



      God Bless John Boehner and God Bless the Grand Old Party!



      Barack Hussein Obama is not My President!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

        This is strange, ChristianMingle.com seems to be advertising dates with robots:



        Sorry folks, but God's match for me isn't made of wires and silicone, it's made of Adam's rib.

        The technology seems to be moving far faster than anyone could have imagined. After all, who could have anticipated the uncanny realism of the Miley Cyrus blow-up doll:

        Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
        Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
        Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

          For once I agree with you religious numpties.

          Apart from anything else who wants to be 'on the job' when the robot reverts to it default programming?

          CRUSH! KILL! DESTROY!

          A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back. Proverbs 26:3

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

            That would violate the first law of robotics, so I don't think that's going to be a problem.
            Dog's are mans best friend .

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: The Godly Richard Deem Says: Don't Have Sex with Robots!

              Originally posted by Forest Spirit View Post
              That would violate the first law of robotics, so I don't think that's going to be a problem.
              Non-biblical laws of any kind are bound to be a problem!

              From sincere Christian love, I suggest you have a look at: Romans 13:1-7 that proves my point.

              Comment

              Working...
              X