[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

I read the Hebrew and Greek bible, I'm just saying i found that some word are translated different.

Sure you did.

Just more proof that all atheists are liars.

[garcia]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

atheists? not an atheists sorry! you just need to go back to the bibles Jewish roots and Greek. You can chose to read the KJV if you like there is not thing wrong with it, I just recommended you to get the Strongs concordance to go with it.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

atheists? not an atheists sorry! you just need to go back to the bibles Jewish roots and Greek. You can chose to read the KJV if you like there is not thing wrong with it, I just recommended you to get the Strongs concordance to go with it.

No.

Can a Translation be as Good as the Originals?

[renaldude]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

Because I don't have a kj1611 version yet i looked for the verses on line. Is this an accurate scan? http://sceti.library.upenn.edu/sceti...ePosition=1328

[garcia]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

http://www.comereason.org/theo_issues/theo025.asp

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

I don't click on links provided by unsaved trash, they usually lead to porn or viruses.

As for an online version.

There's the REAL 1611KJV BIBLE

But since that is probably way beyond your reading skills there is also the KJV Bible in more modern language

Have fun

[renaldude]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

I don't click on links provided by unsaved trash, they usually lead to porn or viruses.

As for an online version.

There's the REAL 1611KJV BIBLE

But since that is probably way beyond your reading skills there is also the KJV Bible in more modern language

Have fun

My, my how well you underestimate others. Thank you for the CORRECT link. I am confused as to how others in this thread say that the REAL 1611KJV BIBLE does not say "let he who is without sin...". John Chapter 8 (1611 Bible)

>>
Viewing the 1611 King James Version. Click to switch to 1769 King James Version of John Chapter 8
Why does the spelling look unusual?


1 Iesus went vnto ye Mount of Oliues:
2 And earely in the morning hee came againe into the Temple, and all the people came vnto him, and he sate downe, and taught them.
3And the Scribes and Pharisees brought vnto him a woman taken in adultery, and when they had set her in the mids,
4 They say vnto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
5 Now Moses in the Law commanded vs, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might haue to accuse him. But Iesus stouped downe, and with his finger wrote on the ground as though he heard them not.
7 So when they continued asking him, hee lift vp himselfe, and saide vnto them, Hee that is without sinne among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8 And againe, hee stouped downe, and wrote on the ground.
Your link, your Version. Who is it that probably cant understand?

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

My, my how well you underestimate others. Thank you for the CORRECT link. I am confused as to how others in this thread say that the REAL 1611KJV BIBLE does not say "let he who is without sin...". John Chapter 8 (1611 Bible)

>>
Viewing the 1611 King James Version. Click to switch to 1769 King James Version of John Chapter 8
Why does the spelling look unusual?


1 Iesus went vnto ye Mount of Oliues:
2 And earely in the morning hee came againe into the Temple, and all the people came vnto him, and he sate downe, and taught them.
3And the Scribes and Pharisees brought vnto him a woman taken in adultery, and when they had set her in the mids,
4 They say vnto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
5 Now Moses in the Law commanded vs, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?
6 This they said, tempting him, that they might haue to accuse him. But Iesus stouped downe, and with his finger wrote on the ground as though he heard them not.
7 So when they continued asking him, hee lift vp himselfe, and saide vnto them, Hee that is without sinne among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
8 And againe, hee stouped downe, and wrote on the ground.
Your link, your Version. Who is it that probably cant understand?

Because it's 1611 spelling. As I said, I doubt that most, with a public school education, would be able to comprehend the REAL 1611 KJV Bible. So I offered a link to a simpler version. If you compare it to the version you linked to, you will see the spelling is the same, just in different fonts.

I got brave and clicked on your link and was pleasantly surprised to see it really was a scan of a Bible. Is it an official 1611 KJV Bible? I don't know, one of the Pastors would have to answer that question as I have no idea who Furness is. It looks like the real thing, but I'm not a Biblical scholar.

As for Garcia's link, it's just NIV lies. I guess if you're so dumb you find the KJV Bible too "hard" to read, you'll find anything that makes you feel better about reading an easier (per)version.

[garcia]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

Calling someone dumb because of the education How disappointing. I did not posted for NIV sake but to show you the process on how some bible got translated.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

Calling someone dumb because of the education How disappointing. I did not posted for NIV sake but to show you the process on how some bible got translated.

ALL Modern Bible Versions are corrupted

Happy reading


NIV Bible quiz

[renaldude]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

Because it's 1611 spelling. As I said, I doubt that most, with a public school education, would be able to comprehend the REAL 1611 KJV Bible. So I offered a link to a simpler version. If you compare it to the version you linked to, you will see the spelling is the same, just in different fonts.

I got brave and clicked on your link and was pleasantly surprised to see it really was a scan of a Bible. Is it an official 1611 KJV Bible? I don't know, one of the Pastors would have to answer that question as I have no idea who Furness is. It looks like the real thing, but I'm not a Biblical scholar.

As for Garcia's link, it's just NIV lies. I guess if you're so dumb you find the KJV Bible too "hard" to read, you'll find anything that makes you feel better about reading an easier (per)version.

First you tell me that the only difference between my version and your verson is the font, so far so good, then you question My link when I showed you that it came from YOUR forum. Does your forum link to false versions? Wait a minute, you already said the ONLY difference is the font. So why would a pastor need to examine it, unless your version is wrong also.
Now back to the real question; why does the topic of the thread state "
Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblical, when the 1611 kjv (in a different font) states just that?

[garcia]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

Thanks I read it lots stuff to read it might take some time but i did notice it did not have anything about "young literal translation bible" is the English version i us most

[BelieverInGod]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

First you tell me that the only difference between my version and your verson is the font, so far so good, then you question My link when I showed you that it came from YOUR forum. Does your forum link to false versions? Wait a minute, you already said the ONLY difference is the font. So why would a pastor need to examine it, unless your version is wrong also.
Now back to the real question; why does the topic of the thread state "
Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblical, when the 1611 kjv (in a different font) states just that?

I said "as far as I can tell" I'm not a Biblical scholar. Oh right, Internet trolls are experts on everything

You're obviously here to pick a fight no matter what anyone says, I'm sorry I gave you the benefit of the doubt.

[garcia]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

let's say it true about the other translation are weak. Thus giving us little faith or weak faith as some of you have said. read this scripture in both KJV and YLT

Matthew 17:20 (KJV)
20And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

Matthew 17:20 (Young's Literal Translation)
20And Jesus said to them, `Through your want of faith; for verily I say to you, if ye may have faith as a grain of mustard, ye shall say to this mount, Remove hence to yonder place, and it shall remove, and nothing shall be impossible to you,



so even if we read the so called weak versions of the bible we can still move mountains in the name of out LORD JESUS CHRIST.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic

let's say it true about the other translation are weak. Thus giving us little faith or weak faith as some of you have said. read this scripture in both KJV and YLT

Matthew 17:20 (KJV)
20And Jesus said unto them, Because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.

Matthew 17:20 (Young's Literal Translation)
20And Jesus said to them, `Through your want of faith; for verily I say to you, if ye may have faith as a grain of mustard, ye shall say to this mount, Remove hence to yonder place, and it shall remove, and nothing shall be impossible to you,



so even if we read the so called weak versions of the bible we can still move mountains in the name of out LORD JESUS CHRIST.

No.

Take the NKJV and NIV Vocabulary Test