[epignosis]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

That seems rather mean when taken into context. Jesus doesn't even want the people he is preaching to understand his meaning.

That's not the portrait of the loving Christ I have always had in my mind.

Actually this is what the bible says on this. It is really the bible we should look to. For understanding. We are to know who God is and what he requires of us. That is why the bible was written to us.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 (King James Version)

16All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

The bible is profitable, for doctrine, for our correction, and our instruction. These are really not my words. The bible says that all scripture is inspired for our instruction. There are many Christian religions, why is that so, since we all use the same book? It is because many use their own ideas, or only parts of the bible. It is really important to look to the bible for our answers.



John 4:23-24 (King James Version)

23But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.

24God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

This means the truth of Gods word. We were given the bible to know God, and what his purposes are and how we fit in that. All of it is there for a purpose, and is meant to be understood.

Joshua 1:8 (King James Version)

8This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success.
This verse mentions all that is written, we should observe. And study it day and night. God really asks us to get to know him, and we do that through the bible, and prayer.

[epignosis]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

If only you had read the Bible, then you would know that the parables mentioned in the verses you quote were very clearly marked as parables. On the other hand the 6 day creation is not marked as a parable, the ten commandments are not marked as a parable, the hatred for the Nicolaitanes' actions is not marked as a parable.

2 Peter 1:20
Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

If Jesus says He's talking in parables then He is talking in parables.
When God does not mention He's talking in parables, then it is not a parable.

It is as simple as that.

I wonder if you noticed that in verse 14 of Mathew 13 that they would not understand the parable.

Matthew 13:13-15 (King James Version)

13Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

14And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:
This is talking about people that hear the words but do not perceive: or have understanding. This is talking about Christians. It is not our place to say which scriptures , we will use and not others. All scripture is inspired for us, to use.

[Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

All scripture is inspired for us, to use.

Amen! That's our thinking on the matter.

[epignosis]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

Amen! That's our thinking on the matter.

Ok, thats great. So many Christians seem to think parts of the bible are not relevant any more.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

Ok, thats great. So many Christians seem to think parts of the bible are not relevant any more.

Not here, friend. While I've disagreed with you on a couple of points over the last couple of days, I do agree with your "whole Bible" approach.



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[epignosis]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

Not here, friend. While I've disagreed with you on a couple of points over the last couple of days, I do agree with your "whole Bible" approach.



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

That's good to hear, I have talked to ones that even have had their, faith eroded to the point that they question if God did really create all that we see around us.
My goal here is not to debate but really just to use the scriptures, and for all to get a better understanding . I may bring up some things you never had though about before. And the same from you.

2 Timothy 3 (King James Version)

2 Timothy 3

16All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

17That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

That seems rather mean when taken into context. Jesus doesn't even want the people he is preaching to understand his meaning.

That's not the portrait of the loving Christ I have always had in my mind.

And there's your problem.

You're hung up on what's in your mind instead of what's in the Bible. If you hadn't been corrupted by your wishy washy interpretationist thinking you'd know that your God is a jealous God. You'd know that your God didn't muck about sending Jesus to die for you just so you could shilly shally about allegory this and non-literall that to wriggle out of doing His will.

Mark 6:11, 12 11And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
12And they went out, and preached that men should repent.

Jesus said it how it was. God doesn't mess around and all your wishy washy stuff can't hide that. No parable, just straight talking.

[cabrin]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

So now we have to take a philosophy class to understand what "thou shalt not steal" means? You intellectual elitists reall have a fine racket set up for yourselves.

Thou shalt not steal is pretty clear. So is thou shalt not kill.

But, as it happens, Jesus killed*, and for very little reason. So, perhaps they are not quite as literal as they seem.

* - Gospel of Thomas

[Pastor William Nathaniel Sampson]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

But, as it happens, Jesus killed*, and for very little reason. So, perhaps they are not quite as literal as they seem.

* - Gospel of Thomas

Not the Gospel of Thomas. The Infancy Gospel of Thomas, which people take even less seriously than the aforementioned GOT.

[GreenPoison]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

I've always been quite fond of the simplicity in the Ten Commandments. While I can understand other parts of the Bible needing some slight intepretation, the ten commandments are pretty solid in what they mean.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

I've always been quite fond of the simplicity in the Ten Commandments. While I can understand other parts of the Bible needing some slight intepretation, the ten commandments are pretty solid in what they mean.

The Bible (KJV 1611) does not need to be interpreted: it is the perfect word of God!

YIC
Posted via Mobile Device

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

I've always been quite fond of the simplicity in the Ten Commandments. While I can understand other parts of the Bible needing some slight intepretation, the ten commandments are pretty solid in what they mean.

Yep. We never get idiots trying to interpret "Thou shalt not kill" to mean thou shalt not kill anyone at all even if God tells you to.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

The soteriology of the New Testament presupposes a literal Adam and compares and contrasts him with a literal Christ:

Romans 5:18-19: Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift came] upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

If Adam can be an allegory in that passage, why can't Christ? In other words, if you deny a literal Adam, how do you not ultimately deny Christianity?

[False Christiaan]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

There is something i have always been wondering about. But, before i get to that i wish to say i do not mean any disrespect whatsoever towards God or any of the men and women on this forum.

Now, for my question. I always hear and see Christian people saying that God created the world as it is to this very day and that Charles Darwin with his evolution theory is wrong. But, my question is what if God created the world but was not fully satisfied at first and decided to change small things untill it was perfect,something evolution does in a sense as well. Again, i do not mean any disrespect but i wanted to know the opinion of the religious side as well.

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: Questions to ask liberal "Christians"

But, my question is what if God created the world but was not fully satisfied at first and decided to change small things untill it was perfect,something evolution does in a sense as well. Again, i do not mean any disrespect but i wanted to know the opinion of the religious side as well.

Impossible. God knew in advance what He would create. How could He be "not satisfied" if He knew what he would do before He did it?

Isaiah 46:9-10 " Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me,

Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:"

Now, if you really are a Christian and are not here just to mock God, kindly introduce yourself here. Tell us what Church you attend, your most favorite Holy Bible verse and all about your personal relationship with Jesus.

In Christ