[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

Really, jiggling bosoms... hmm.

Much of my missionary work is done at the hooters in Champaign Urbana (home of the University of Illinois), and from experience I can tell you that most of the girls who work there do not have jiggling bosoms.


Too much plastic?

And what live dinosaur have you seen to show that it did not have jiggling bosoms? *in lieu of a live dinosaur, I will also accept proof with a fully intact mummified dinosaur with a flat chest* Until you can show me that it DIDN'T have them, you can not say for certain that I am wrong.

YIC
V

It would have had pectoral muscles, not mammary tissue. It's mammary tissue that "jiggles".

Although I have to admit that the mental visual of a T rex in a Wonder Bra was pretty funny.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

OK - they were saurians.
But that does not change the fact that only mammals have breasts.

OK, then explain this. I am, to use your scientific terminology, a "mammal", and yet I don't have breasts. Face it, your story just doesn't add up.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

OK, then explain this. I am, to use your scientific terminology, a "mammal", and yet I don't have breasts. Face it, your story just doesn't add up.

Look under your shirt. Those little pinkish-brown dots with the raised centers on either side of your chest are nipples. Men have rudimentary breasts.

[G-Baby]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

ROFLMAO!! Dinosaurs having breasts!! Thats be biggest crap I've ever heard. You guys surpass yourselves.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

ROFLMAO!! Dinosaurs having breasts!! Thats be biggest crap I've ever heard. You guys surpass yourselves.

Thank you. You agree the Gigantoraptor is a fake then.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

Look under your shirt. Those little pinkish-brown dots with the raised centers on either side of your chest are nipples. Men have rudimentary breasts.

You sickos'll just take any excuse to try and drag Rudimentary Peni into the conversation, won't you? Don't lie, I can see where that was headed.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

You sickos'll just take any excuse to try and drag Rudimentary Peni into the conversation, won't you? Don't lie, I can see where that was headed.

Actually, I was not even thinking about that. I was specifically addressing your comment. If you insist on reading more into it than was there, I can't stop you.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another lie of science

(Bump)

I am bumping this thread up as an example to our new members of the absurdities Darwinists push in the name of their "science". Animals with 150lb breasts, what is next Darwinists, the Penisauris Rex?

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

The term "breast" as applied to a bird is a misnomer, albeit a popular and longstanding one. A chicken "breast" is actually just pectoral muscle, not a true breast. A true breast contains mammary (milk-producing) tissue.

And for you new readers, the quote is a statement that displays the dismal ignorance of the poster.

OK, it's an easy one and you've all spotted it! Yes, yes, you are all correct! "A bat" I hear you cry. "A bat is a bird yet a bat has real breasts (well, the female ones)!"

So, you young Christians out there, help us spread the word and put this idiot so-called scientific types in their place.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

And for you new readers, the quote is a statement that displays the dismal ignorance of the poster.

OK, it's an easy one and you've all spotted it! Yes, yes, you are all correct! "A bat" I hear you cry. "A bat is a bird yet a bat has real breasts (well, the female ones)!"

So, you young Christians out there, help us spread the word and put this idiot so-called scientific types in their place.

A bat is a mammal, not a bird.

[Daisy Mae Johnson]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

A bat is a mammal, not a bird.

Whatever it is, it is one of GOD'S beautiful creations.


Aw, just look!

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

A bat is a mammal, not a bird.

The obviously you can't tell the difference between simple micro feathers that bats have and hair.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

The obviously you can't tell the difference between simple micro feathers that bats have and hair.

Bats give birth to and suckle live young; birds don't.

Bats do not have beaks; birds do.

Bats do not have scales on their legs and feet; birds do.

And if you put the hair shaft from a bat under a microscope, you would find that it is indeed hair, not feather.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

Bats give birth to and suckle live young; birds don't.

Bats do not have beaks; birds do.

Bats do not have scales on their legs and feet; birds do.

And if you put the hair shaft from a bat under a microscope, you would find that it is indeed hair, not feather.

Nonsense, birds do have the teeth! The gene for them is just dormant. Bats are just birds with the teeth gene active.

As for breasts it's your secularist scientists who come up with Giganoraptor and its oedipial fantasy of some bird thing with breasts the size of a adult human.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Gigantoraptor; another fact of science

Nonsense, birds do have the teeth! The gene for them is just dormant. Bats are just birds with the teeth gene active.

Birds do not have teeth; that's why they swallow sand or gravel. The sand or gravel goes into the bird's gizzard and grinds the food after it's swallowed - it takes the place of teeth. Bats don't have gizzards.