Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
- Epicurus [341–270 B.C.]
What does that mean exactly? Well, I’m hoping to dissect it piece by piece and let you “believers” try to come up with some kind of rebuttal. Unfortunately this will not be easy, as this quote takes care of about 99% of “faith” based arguments.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
For the first part of the quote he is saying:
Would God prevent evil if he could, but not able to? Then he is not an all powerful being, or God.
The next part of the quote is more of what Christians believe God is without even realizing it:
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
When translated down:
Is he able to stop evil, but doesn’t want to? Then he is evil.
This is a great one for Christians who say he can stop it, and he would if he could:
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Which, when I say it, sounds like this:
Is he able to stop evil and would if he could? Then where the hell does evil come from?
Final piece, my favorite, is:
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Translates to:
Can he not stop evil and doesn’t care? Then why call him God?
Can anyone prove Epicurus wrong? No matter what God you choose, either evil or not powerful, it’s not something I would ever pray to or give my entire life to.
Comment