Tweet
Unfortunately there are only very few true churches which still try to follow the Teaching of the Holy Bible and our God, Jesus Christ.We live really in the Last Days!
-
Proverbs 1:7 King James Version (KJV)
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction. -
Re: The Last Days
So is the Pope the anti-christ? I always thought that Jesus built his church upon the rock which was peter. See Matthew 16:18Deuteronomy 20:13-14: And when the LORD thy God hath delivered it into thine hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the sword:
But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle, and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof, shalt thou take unto thyself; and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies, which the LORD thy God hath given thee. -
Re: The Last Days
Did Peter ever say that the Bishop of Rome should lead all of Christianity? I must have missed that in the Bible.Originally posted by donejohn98 View PostChristians are superior because we possess an understanding that unbelievers lack. It is through the Power of Jesus only the converted mind is able to understand what is going on in the world; what the Communists are really up to; what Satan's intentions are. Most unbelievers do not even believe in Satan and cannot understand his tactics.
Comment
-
Re: The Last Days
How do you get from that to the "apostolic succession" of perverts and con artists that is the papacy?Originally posted by donejohn98 View PostThis church is dedicated to preaching True Christianity™ and the King James Bible exactly as they are, with no alterations to make them more politically correct for modern liberals. If you think that we've misquoted or twisted Scripture or quoted any verse out of context, please explain in detail how we've done so. Otherwise, if what you read on this site offends you, then you're offended by Almighty God and His Word, not by us.
Questions to ask liberal "Christians" ✞ Things that the Bible doesn't say ✞ Tolerance
sigpicComment
-
Re: The Last Days
You are weird.Originally posted by donejohn98 View Post
You will have to show me where God gave Peter the keys. You may be thinking of this:
M't:16:15: He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
M't:16:16: And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
M't:16:17: And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
M't:16:18: And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
See, Only Jesus can save us from Hell, Not Peter. The Rock is the Christ, the Son of the living God.
Don’t believe me? Or you don’t believe God?
1Co:10:4: And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.sigpic
Author of such illuminating essays as,
“We must reassert that the essence of Christianity is the love of obedience to God’s Laws and that how that complete obedience is used or implemented does not concern us.”
Map of the Known World; Periodic Table of Elements; The History of Linguistics; The Errors of Wicca; Dolphins and Evolution; The History of Landover (The Apology); Landover and the Civil War; 2000 Racial Slurs.Comment
-
Re: The Last Days
Why do catlicks claim that Peter was ever in Rome?sigpic
Psalm 109:8
Let his days be few; and let another take his office.Comment
-
Re: The Last Days
It's complicated. But I've researched the topic.Originally posted by Godsgrace View Post
First point is that catolick are in league with Satan. Now El Diabalo being an angel of the highest order, though a fallen one, knows things about the future.
He knew about Joseph Smith and his eventual founding of the heathen Mormon Church. Now around 325 CE (I'm sure you recognize the significance of that date) Satan told some bishops of Rome about Joseph Smith's plans. The catolicks in an enterprise of one-upmanship decided to invent a founder for their church and backdated its establishment.
About that time comes that prevaricator Eusebius, a corrupt catolick if ever there was one, who decides to write an invented history with imaginary popes starting with Peter. I doubt seriously whether Peter himself was amused sitting up in heaven. The end result is that we have a heathen church that pretends to have gotten the rights to tell every other Christian what to do, and they palter by asserting that Baby Jesus himself established their church.
But it all boils down to what you implied in your question -- there is no scriptural evidence that Peter was in Rome. He was in Galilee, Capernaum. Jerusalem, Joppa, Antioch, Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, Bithynia and a few other places in Judea/Israel region.YiJC, BS
II Peter 1:4 -- Whereby are giuen vnto vs exceeding great and precious promises, that by these you might bee partakers of thy diuine nature, hauing escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.Comment
Comment