[Dameon_ACLUtard]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

You would castrate him for pissing on the seat? That's harsh.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

You would castrate him for pissing on the seat? That's harsh.

Watch the salty language boy. You've been warned....

[G-Baby]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I don't believe biology has any value, unless taught from a Christian perspective. According to my sources, these days "biology class" is a gateway to ritual sacrifice - children dissecting frogs and whatnot, learning how best to hack up small creatures for Satan.
Aah, don't be such a worrywart...
This day, biology class teaches us how nature works.

There is nothing "silly" about two-fingered typing, missy! When one's hands are gnarled and arthritic, having two usable fingers is a blessing from God Himself; and your mean-spirited reply to my kindly offer is quite hurtful.

I don't have that problem..
I said thanks, didn't I

[Star Finder]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

and mine would be rubbing your nose in your piddle, followed by having you neutered - thus increasing your chances of salvation: Star Finder, Eunuch for Christ.

Oh thank you Mrs. Rogers. I have to tell you that the first would give me much joy

and the second is no longer necessary.

as it is my chances of salvation are slim.

but I'm glad you want to spend time with me.

[Peter]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I don't believe biology has any value, unless taught from a Christian perspective. According to my sources, these days "biology class" is a gateway to ritual sacrifice - children dissecting frogs and whatnot, learning how best to hack up small creatures for Satan.

No, it teaches them how animals look from the inside. If you won't even accept that evolution can be proven by that, then you are really retarded.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Ok, I'm sure I'll get a good telling-off for posting the word 'testicle', but here it is. How would intelligent design answer the question of testicles? For you see, male avians (birds) have their sexual organs tucked neatly inside, and they only come out when it is time for the bird to mate.
Why is this not the case for human males as well?

For as the men here probably know, even a slight prod to that area is enough to induce pain, and kicking a man hard enough there can induce unbelievable pain and/or medical problems.

So, if you believe in intelligent design, how do you explain the fact such a sensitive organ, vital for reproduction and survival of the race, has been placed in such a vulnerable position, as well as being extremely sensitive? You'd think it'd be at least tough.

So then, flat-earthers, explain that one.

Well as previously mentioned Miss Helsing, sperm production is very sensitive to temperature. Yet even more than just slowing down when its too cold or hot, the sperm will actually die in temperatures that are too hot or cold, therefor they hang outside normally when it is warm enough wherever the person happens to be, since if they shrunk in it would become too warm from body heat and the room temperature and the sperm would die.

Yet if it was too cold, they would shrink back in, to use the body's heat to keep warm enough to keep production up, and those already present alive.

Now you raise the point of if it was intelligently designed then it wouldn't hurt if touched, which is a fair view, but I ask, the only real way to make that happen was if there were no nerve endings at all inside the scrotum or penis. If that happened, how would the male become erect for intercourse? With no sensation he couldn't get aroused and thus be unable to perform, thereby endangering the procreation process and the species as a whole if no new generations were produced. Not to mention even if he were able to become erect, then he'd receive absolutely no sensations from anything, and well frankly...wheres the fun in that?

That's my opinion anyways.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Well as previously mentioned Miss Helsing, sperm production is very sensitive to temperature. Yet even more than just slowing down when its too cold or hot, the sperm will actually die in temperatures that are too hot or cold, therefor they hang outside normally when it is warm enough wherever the person happens to be, since if they shrunk in it would become too warm from body heat and the room temperature and the sperm would die.

Yet if it was too cold, they would shrink back in, to use the body's heat to keep warm enough to keep production up, and those already present alive.

Now you raise the point of if it was intelligently designed then it wouldn't hurt if touched, which is a fair view, but I ask, the only real way to make that happen was if there were no nerve endings at all inside the scrotum or penis. If that happened, how would the male become erect for intercourse? With no sensation he couldn't get aroused and thus be unable to perform, thereby endangering the procreation process and the species as a whole if no new generations were produced. Not to mention even if he were able to become erect, then he'd receive absolutely no sensations from anything, and well frankly...wheres the fun in that?

That's my opinion anyways.

Watch the salty language jooboy. While harlots like VanBabyeater might be used to hearing talk like that, the True Christian ladies on this Godly forum are not.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Watch the salty language jooboy. While harlots like VanBabyeater might be used to hearing talk like that, the True Christian ladies on this Godly forum are not.

Fair enough. I apologize for any offending terms, though I'll have to ask you which ones those were, so I'll know which ones make your ears bleed.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Fair enough. I apologize for any offending terms, though I'll have to ask you which ones those were, so I'll know which ones make your ears bleed.

You claim to have familiarized yourself with our Godly forum, yet you haven't studyed THIS thread?

As a general rule, we do not engage in explicit discussions of the sinful parts of our bodies, nor the whoredoms they tend to commit. There are times when things get a bit wild in the Men Only thread, but we don't allow homers in there, so I'm afraid that you and your butt buddy aren't welcome there.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

So I can't say the name of our genitals, but we can spout the word "Whoredom" all we want? Well, I suppose that makes total sense.

Btw since when did I become a homer? I don't remember choosing to be gay...nor do I ever remember ever being attracted to a man...

[Goatski]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Ok, I'm sure I'll get a good telling-off for posting the word 'testicle', but here it is. How would intelligent design answer the question of testicles? For you see, male avians (birds) have their sexual organs tucked neatly inside, and they only come out when it is time for the bird to mate.
Why is this not the case for human males as well?

For as the men here probably know, even a slight prod to that area is enough to induce pain, and kicking a man hard enough there can induce unbelievable pain and/or medical problems.

So, if you believe in intelligent design, how do you explain the fact such a sensitive organ, vital for reproduction and survival of the race, has been placed in such a vulnerable position, as well as being extremely sensitive? You'd think it'd be at least tough.

So then, flat-earthers, explain that one.

I guess birds ARE intelligently designed but humans aren't?

"There is no intelligent design because I would have made things differently if I had the power"

That is the entire synthesis of your argument, Rachael. It is a pig-headed and wholly subjective proposition rooted in your subconscious desire to disprove that which you revile, but sadly, can never disprove.

"Well, if my pen was intelligently designed it would be much shorter and fit on my index finger, sort of like a thimble, and it would almost seem as if the ink was coming out of my finger tip. But, alas, it isn't how I would do it so I guess no intelligence had any hand in its manufacturing." - The Logic of Rachael

Without adding any type of deity to the equation I feel we can at least agree that there is hardware and software, matter and laws. When hydrogen and oxygen are placed in the proximity water is the result; a product of said hardware and software. And there are many other lines to this code to this program. Now given the whole of this program(thermodynamics, gravity, all that stuff) how would you make it where we can get different results to the male scrotum of present human anatomy from the same program? Think hard on this one. Don't rush it.

And let us not forget that an unintelligent, unaware and unconscious system has no sense of itself. Therefore, unconscious things do not compensate for factors that they inherently cannot fathom. Sooooo, the idea that the testicular muscles contract and retract to maintain the proper temperature for optimal sperm germination would be a false statement because unaware and unintelligent hardware cannot comprehend itself and take action toward such a goal. However, this temperature control mechanism within the function of the testicles has been scientifically proven to be true, no? Something to consider.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Sweet Jesus this goatboy is a loon. Is anyone following a word of this crack-induced diatribe?

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I guess birds ARE intelligently designed but humans aren't?

"There is no intelligent design because I would have made things differently if I had the power"

That is the entire synthesis of your argument, Rachael. It is a pig-headed and wholly subjective proposition rooted in your subconscious desire to disprove that which you revile, but sadly, can never disprove.

"Well, if my pen was intelligently designed it would be much shorter and fit on my index finger, sort of like a thimble, and it would almost seem as if the ink was coming out of my finger tip. But, alas, it isn't how I would do it so I guess no intelligence had any hand in its manufacturing." - The Logic of Rachael

Without adding any type of deity to the equation I feel we can at least agree that there is hardware and software, matter and laws. When hydrogen and oxygen are placed in the proximity water is the result; a product of said hardware and software. And there are many other lines to this code to this program. Now given the whole of this program(thermodynamics, gravity, all that stuff) how would you make it where we can get different results to the male scrotum of present human anatomy from the same program? Think hard on this one. Don't rush it.

And let us not forget that an unintelligent, unaware and unconscious system has no sense of itself. Therefore, unconscious things do not compensate for factors that they inherently cannot fathom. Sooooo, the idea that the testicular muscles contract and retract to maintain the proper temperature for optimal sperm germination would be a false statement because unaware and unintelligent hardware cannot comprehend itself and take action toward such a goal. However, this temperature control mechanism within the function of the testicles has been scientifically proven to be true, no? Something to consider.

So....uh...what exactly is your point? Logic would have it that you have a point stashed in there somewhere, but what is it, exactly?

[Goatski]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

Sweet Jesus this goatboy is a loon. Is anyone following a word of this crack-induced diatribe?

I take it you are on the side of the atheist pagan, Rachael?

You really do need to realize your Hannibal Lector type infatuation with her. I know you are progressives and all, but taking up for satan over god is just inexcusable.

So....uh...what exactly is your point? Logic would have it that you have a point stashed in there somewhere, but what is it, exactly?

You know exactly what I said and you understood it clearly. You've been put in your place and have been left speechless in the wake of my objective logic.

I accept your apology.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Masculinity proves intelligent design!

I take it you are on the side of the atheist pagan, Rachael?

I'm not an atheist, clearly. 'Atheist Pagan' is an oxymoron.
I'm only atheistic towards the abrahamic religions, and I'm an evolutionist. But I'm still pagan.

You really do need to realize your Hannibal Lector type infatuation with her. I know you are progressives and all, but taking up for satan over god is just inexcusable.

Really, ******n, weird Zeke may be, but I really don't see him as a potential Hannibal Lecter.

You know exactly what I said and you understood it clearly. You've been put in your place and have been left speechless in the wake of my objective logic.

I accept your apology.

Yes, I understood what you were saying, but I still don't know what overall point you were trying to make. Or did you just feel like arguing?