[Belphegor]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

this is by far the worst argument i saw in my whole entire life...............

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

God to be "limitless" in power cannot be male, female or even a being simply by making him one of those things you have limited his power by giving him a form.

So why do you refer to Him as "him" rather than "they" or "it"? Besides, if God "cannot be... a being" does that mean that He can't exist? Tosh and nonsense, He is male and He's shown Moses His hindparts to prove it.

God may have written the bible but for as long as it has been on earth it must have suffered from corruption multiple times that currently it is probably very different that the first one.

So you think that God is limitless in power, but He lacks the basic competence necessary to stop mere mortals from messing with His writings? There are still exisiting uncorrupted first folio editions of Shakespeare's writings, so by your "logic" the Almighty God is less powerful than some effete Anglofag with a liking for awful puns.

That’s silly monkeys eat bananas and a monkey's had fits well around a bananas, so God made bananas for monkeys not people.

Who are you calling a silly monkey? Bananas fitting into monkey hands is purely a coincidence. You might as well claim that God must have intended sodomy to be natural, because He created - no, it's too disgusting, I can't go on. The Earth was made for God and humans, not monkeys! What are you, some kind of a Darwinist?

Also satin is too busy chewing on Brutus, Cassius and Judas for all eternity (he is entrapped in ice)

So you think that, of the worst possible spot in Hell, 2/3s of it is given over to the people who killed Julius Caesar, and only 1/3 to the Jew who killed Christ? Tells us quite a lot about your priorities, doesn't it?.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

God to be "limitless" in power cannot be male, female or even a being simply by making him one of those things you have limited his power by giving him a form.

God may have written the bible but for as long as it has been on earth it must have suffered from corruption multiple times that currently it is probably very different that the first one.

That’s silly monkeys eat bananas and a monkey's had fits well around a bananas, so God made bananas for monkeys not people.

Also satin is too busy chewing on Brutus, Cassius and Judas for all eternity (he is entrapped in ice)

Sir, I am well-aquainted with a True Christian™ blonde bombshell who has a liking for satin sheets. I can assure you that they do not bite or chew.

Your rambling post leaves me wondering what color the trees are on your planet.

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

God to be "limitless" in power cannot be male, female or even a being simply by making him one of those things you have limited his power by giving him a form.

God may have written the bible but for as long as it has been on earth it must have suffered from corruption multiple times that currently it is probably very different that the first one.

That’s silly monkeys eat bananas and a monkey's had fits well around a bananas, so God made bananas for monkeys not people.

Also satin is too busy chewing on Brutus, Cassius and Judas for all eternity (he is entrapped in ice)

I see you're a Catholic who believes Dante's Inferno is somehow based in the Bible. Could you show us the Biblical basis for this belief of yours? (How would a shiny soft fabric chew on anyone? And why would God make a Brutusicle?)

Can you honestly believe that the Creator of the Universe is so powerless as to allow His Holy Word to be "corrupted multiple times"? If God wanted to correct every Bible on Earth simultaneously, He could do so in an instant!

You, sir, are the one who attempts to limit God.

[Alaric Reinner]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

God to be "limitless" in power cannot be male, female or even a being simply by making him one of those things you have limited his power by giving him a form.

God may have written the bible but for as long as it has been on earth it must have suffered from corruption multiple times that currently it is probably very different that the first one.

That’s silly monkeys eat bananas and a monkey's had fits well around a bananas, so God made bananas for monkeys not people.

Also satin is too busy chewing on Brutus, Cassius and Judas for all eternity (he is entrapped in ice)

[mister A.H. (On Moderation)]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

We say we are Americans because we are citizens of the Godly United States of America!

Of course, you are Americans. You all live in the USA and because of that you are Americans. But what he ment was that the white Americans are descendants of Europeans and mostly from the Spanisch. The indians are the natives in your country.

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

Then why do you say that you are all Americans
here are some arguments :
1) I didn't knew that jesus had a computer
2) He's dead, explain me how he cries
3) Dont forget to water the plants in that garden..oh, wait, there isnt one...

We say we are Americans because we are citizens of the Godly United States of America!

Why do you say you are Belgian?

Those are statements, not arguments. And you're an idiot, going on Sabbatical for your childish and imbecilic rantings.

Ta, Vibratorlover.

[Wibralover]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

Watch your language, heathen! JESUS reads this forum and your actions make HIM cry.

While we may be descended from Europeans we are now our own country and are not European anymore. If we are who we are descended from as you imply then there are no Europeans either as we are all from the Garden of Eden.

Then why do you say that you are all Americans
here are some arguments :
1) I didn't knew that jesus had a computer
2) He's dead, explain me how he cries
3) Dont forget to water the plants in that garden..oh, wait, there isnt one...

[Jesus is Lord]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

You sir are a fokking racist neonazi son of a byatch
You all say that you are Americans right ? well...
AMERICANS DON'T EXIST Columbus the Spaniard 'discovered' a new continent and thought it was India so therefore he called these native people Indians.
Amerigo Vespucci ,also a Spaniard did the same trip as Columbus and realised that it was not India but another continent and the continent was named after him : AMERICA
Spaniards and other Europeans went to populate this new continent so therefore there are NO AMERICANS ONLY EUROPEANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LEARN HISTORY PRE-SCHOOLER

PS:Science rules

Watch your language, heathen! JESUS reads this forum and your actions make HIM cry.

While we may be descended from Europeans we are now our own country and are not European anymore. If we are who we are descended from as you imply then there are no Europeans either as we are all from the Garden of Eden.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

You sir are a fokking racist neonazi son of a byatch
You all say that you are Americans right ? well...
AMERICANS DON'T EXIST Columbus the Spaniard 'discovered' a new continent and thought it was India so therefore he called these native people Indians.
Amerigo Vespucci ,also a Spaniard did the same trip as Columbus and realised that it was not India but another continent and the continent was named after him : AMERICA
Spaniards and other Europeans went to populate this new continent so therefore there are NO AMERICANS ONLY EUROPEANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LEARN HISTORY PRE-SCHOOLER

PS:Science rules

I can barely even think how to respond to a statement of that immense idiocy. I suppose you think there are no humans, only monkeys?

[Wibralover]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

If you had ever read the Holy Bible, you would know that God is a White Male. Throughout the Bible God refers to Himself as "HE". And He created us in His image....God loves and has blessed America over all nations, therefore He is White.

Anymore stupid questions?[/quote]

You sir are a f**king racist neonazi son of a b*tch
You all say that you are Americans right ? well...
AMERICANS DON'T EXIST Columbus the Spaniard 'discovered' a new continent and thought it was India so therefore he called these native people Indians.
Amerigo Vespucci ,also a Spaniard did the same trip as Columbus and realised that it was not India but another continent and the continent was named after him : AMERICA
Spaniards and other Europeans went to populate this new continent so therefore there are NO AMERICANS ONLY EUROPEANS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LEARN HISTORY PRE-SCHOOLER

PS:Science rules

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

now i know you dont like my posts because they arent scientific enough for you (even though you always say how science is lying, yet you tell me to show you proof), how about this one....?? are these all lies? i can assure you my imagination couldnt make this stuff up, and there is NO reason for scientists to lie, and every reason for the church to lie.

Friend,

If you are saying we TRUE Christians are lying you are saying God Himself is lying in The Bible. I think I have gone over this point with you; you are demaning we TRUE Christians appostate our religon and we are not going to do this.

Do you understand me 153IQ?

[Appelfap.]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

No, have you ever seen your great-great grandfather in person? Does that mean he never existed? You are such a tool, Appleflaple.

I didn't said that

[15.3IQ (On Moderation)]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

i keep getting told that im rude and all i do is make claims without evidence....well my first few posts were very intellectual and did have scientific evidence, but as soon as the evidence doesnt suit your beliefs its called evil and its all lies....you guys go on about how carbon-14 dating only goes bacl 60,000 years, well thats already enough to prove the bible wrong in that aspect, and when you take the bible literally, andy fallacy in the bible ruins that.

so what about the age of the earth?

Modern geologists consider the age of the earth to be around 4.567 billion years (4.567×109 years). This age represents a compromise between the interpretations of oldest-known terrestrial minerals – small crystals of zircon from the Jack Hills of Western Australia – and astronomers' and planetologists determinations of the age of the solar system based in part on radiometric age dating of meteorite material and lunar samples.
Interpretation of radiometric age dating of zircons suggests that the Earth is at least 4.404 billion years old. Comparing the mass and luminosity of the Sun to the multitudes of other stars, it appears that the solar system cannot be much older than those rocks. Ca-Al-Rich inclusions (inclusions rich in calcium and aluminum) – the oldest known solid constituents within meteorites which are formed within the solar system – are 4.567 billion years old, giving an age for the solar system and an upper limit for the age of the Earth. It is assumed that the accretion of the Earth began soon after the formation of the Ca-Al-rich inclusions and the meteorites. Since the exact accretion time of the Earth is not yet known, and the predictions from different accretion models vary from several millions up to about 100 million years, the exact age of the Earth is difficult to define.
In the centuries preceding the scientific revolution, the age of the Earth was determined either by using the accounts of creation in religious texts, or by philosophical interpretations of geologic features (most notable are the Greek philosophers Theophrastus and Xenophanes).


now we can compare that to your method....that wasnt even mentioned until the 17th-century....

The chronologies of Ussher and other biblical scholars corresponded so closely because they used much the same methodology to calculate key events recorded in the Bible. Their task was complicated by the fact that the Bible was compiled from different sources over several centuries with differing versions and lengthy chronological gaps, making it impossible to do a simple totaling of Biblical ages and dates. In his article on Ussher's calendar, James Barr has identified three distinct periods that Ussher had to tackle:

• Early times (Creation to Solomon). Ostensibly the easiest period, as the Bible provides an unbroken male lineage from Adam through to Solomon complete with the ages of the individuals involved. However, not all of the versions of the Bible provide the same ages — the Septuagint gives much longer ages, adding about 1500 years to the date of Creation. Ussher resolved this problem by relying on the Hebrew Bible instead.

• Early Age of Kings (Solomon to the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem and the Babylonian captivity). The lineage breaks down at this point, with only the length of the kings' reigns being provided and a number of overlaps and ambiguities complicating the picture. Ussher had to cross-reference the Biblical records with known dates of other people and rulers to create an overall timeline.

• Late Age of Kings (Ezra and Nehemiah to the birth of Jesus). No information at all is provided in the Bible. Ussher and his counterparts therefore had to try to link a known event from this period with a dateable event in another culture, such as the Chaldeans, Persians or Romans. For instance, the death of the Chaldean King Nebushadnezzar II (who conquered Jerusalem in 586 BC) could be correlated with the 37th year of the exile of Jehoiachin (in 2 Kings 25:27).

Using these methods, Ussher was able to establish an unadjusted Creation date of about 4000 BC. He moved it back to 4004 BC to take account of an error perpetrated by Dionysius, the founder of the Anno Domini numbering system. Josephus indicated that the death of Herod The Great occurred in 4 BC, therefore Jesus could not have been born after that date. Jesus was born some time between 37 BC (when Herod came to power) and 4 BC. In the event, Ussher calculated that Christ's birth year must have been 4 BC.
The season in which Creation occurred was the subject of considerable theological debate in Ussher's time. Many scholars proposed it had taken place in the spring, the start of the Babylonian, Chaldean and other cultures' chronologies. Others, including Ussher, thought it more likely that it had occurred in the autumn (fall), largely because that season marked the beginning of the Jewish year.
Ussher further narrowed down the date by using the Jewish calander to establish Creation as beginning on a Sunday near the autumnal equinox. The day of the week was a backward calculation from the six days of creation with God resting on the seventh, which in the Jewish tradition is Saturday — hence Creation began on a Sunday. The astronomical tables that Ussher probably used were Kepler's Tabulae Rudolphinae (Rudolphine Tables, 1627). Using them, he would have concluded that the equinox occurred on Tuesday October 25, only one day earlier than the traditional day of its creation, on the fourth day of Creation week, Wednesday, along with the Sun, Moon, and stars (Genesis 1:16). Modern equations place the autumnal equinox of 4004 BC on Sunday October 23.
Ussher stated his time of Creation (nightfall preceding October 23) on the first page of Annales in Latin and on the first page of its English translation Annals of the World (1658). The following English quote is based on both, with a serious error in the 1658 English version corrected by referring to the Latin version (calendar → period).






now that would have to assume the bible was right in the first place but the only way you think it to be right is because the book itself says it is right....now we know wrestling is fake....but if wrestling said it was real would that be enough reason to just believe it?



you never heard god say the book was his. so we cant be sure.



now i know you dont like my posts because they arent scientific enough for you (even though you always say how science is lying, yet you tell me to show you proof), how about this one....?? are these all lies? i can assure you my imagination couldnt make this stuff up, and there is NO reason for scientists to lie, and every reason for the church to lie.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Bananas Prove God Exists

Well, he/she/it did say that it "appeared to be" older than Creation. If you're a scientist studying things through a lens of Satanic deception, many falsehoods will "appear" true.