[Hairy Homer]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

So close Rachael, so close. No potential Sister in Christ Rachael; those ideas were pre-stolen by Satan and given to these heathen to mock Christianity.

Still, you are doing very good. Hugs for you.

Is Satan omniscient according to your thinking?

Or, could he see the future? He knew in advance that Christ would die for us, etc?

Just asking.

[Hairy Homer]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

The presence of a foreskin during s*x can increase the chance of HIV infection by as much as 800%, and is connected to many other sexually transmitted diseases and health problems. Now, can you tell me why on Earth such a thing could naturally evolve? Really, tell me.

If anything, God gave men foreskins as a little reminder that evolution is a lie.

My goodness, you are very well-informed for a True Christian™ lady!

Does your husband or father approve of you talking openly in public about foreskins, s*x, HIV, STD, and the relationship between foreskins and health problems generally?

Good gracious. I am astonished that the Pastors haven't reprimanded you severely and taken you aside to quiz you about just how on earth you know so much about the health problems related to TallyWhackers.

Surely you should leave this sort of thing to the menfolk, and even if you do know something about it, not go brazenly speaking about such things in public.

Your sound more like a some callow strumpet or tart than a Christian lady! Would Sister Glendora speak like that! Of course not! She is a True© Lady! (Even if I say so myself.)

[Glendora Christianson]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Thanks to Rachael Van Heelclicker, an innocent woman has been arrested for carrying out God's commands.

[Hairy Homer]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Thanks to Rachael Van Heelclicker, an innocent woman has been arrested for carrying out God's commands.

Surely she overdid it Glendora? She seemed intent on preventing him create soldiers for Christ or any offspring at all. I don't think even Rachael would go that far.

[OnYourKnees]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Your sound more like a some callow strumpet or tart than a Christian lady! Would Sister Glendora speak like that! Of course not! She is a True© Lady! (Even if I say so myself.)

Stop hitting on Mother Glynndie! She is not interested in your sort, and is already married anyway!

As for Sister VD, everyone knows that she was a sex education teacher before she was Saved, and has always been a great source of information on what public schools are teaching youngsters. She has provided many instructional videos, pamphlets, sex toys, etc. used in "sexular" education, that we may be thoroughly familiar with the enemy's sex-glorification techniques.

Sister VD now teaches Landover's own Abstinence Education courses.

[Hairy Homer]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Stop hitting on Mother Glynndie! She is not interested in your sort, and is already married anyway!

As for Sister VD, everyone knows that she was a sex education teacher before she was Saved, and has always been a great source of information on what public schools are teaching youngsters. She has provided many instructional videos, pamphlets, sex toys, etc. used in "sexular" education, that we may be thoroughly familiar with the enemy's sex-glorification techniques.

Sister VD now teaches Landover's own Abstinence Education courses.

Hitting on her? I am merely expressing my admiration. I would not dream of hitting on Glendora. I am more interested in someone more my own age, and am still heartbroken over being rejected by Lady Sorrow anyway. It will be years before I can even think of another woman in that fashion.

Thank you for the information about Sister VD's background. That was quick footwork makes it all clear.

[Lady Sorrow]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Mister Hairy, I only said that while you aren't a True Christian man, I can't consider you as a potential suitor. If you were to become Saved, then all that would change, provided that the Pastors agreed to such a match.

As to this topic, how vile!
It's easy to see what Mrs VanHellthing has on her mind 24/7! Dimwitted harlot, you answered your own question. The ideas were pre-stolen by the devil and his minions, and the possessed Ancient Egyptians made those carvings so to confuse more people and stop them being saved.
Circumcision is an act as a mark of the covenant. And once a Godly man is found for me, if he isn't already circumcised, I will insist that he is.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Anyway, back on topic, I'm amazed that no-one's yet pointed out the obvious proof that God designed foreskins:
1 Samuel 18:25 And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines.
26 And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king's son in law: and the days were not expired.
27 Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.

See, GOD clearly designed foreskins so that David could use them for dowry. Pretty simple, really.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

I'm sorry, BT, but that argument is rather silly. Not to mention a contadiction. If the foreskin removal was meant to be a sign of the covenant, than by removing the foreskin of the philistines, would that make them part of the covenant too?

But the point is, in every discussion of forekins in the bible, it is said that they should be removed. And if they were so offensive and disgusting, why would they be wanted as a dowry?
And not to mention the whole covenant thing. First you claim one thing, then the other. Which is it??

[Brother Temperance]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

I'm sorry, BT, but that argument is rather silly. Not to mention a contadiction. If the foreskin removal was meant to be a sign of the covenant, than by removing the foreskin of the philistines, would that make them part of the covenant too?

No. The point is that he was removing the foreskins from corpses, as Our Loving God commanded. The fact that the corpses still had corpses proved that they were not True Proto-Christians™ in life, and thus it was fine to kill them. Foreskins are needed as physical proof that an unsaved sinner is not part of the covenant - if foreskins didn't exist, then one could just slaughter me, Pastor Ezekiel and Brother Bobby-Joe, and then hand our non-existent foreskins in pretending they belonged to the top leadership of Al-Qaida or the Democratic Party. Think about it.

But the point is, in every discussion of forekins in the bible, it is said that they should be removed. And if they were so offensive and disgusting, why would they be wanted as a dowry?

As proof that any prospective husband was good at killing unsaved, uncircumcised proto-ragheads, duh.

And not to mention the whole covenant thing. First you claim one thing, then the other. Which is it??

BOTH, you insufferably backwards witch!

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

I'm sorry, BT, but that argument is just silly. That incident you mention was a one-off. Never again does the bible mention any such thing.

Which then goes back to the whole covenant thing, which then goes back to the fact that there were people doing it a LONG time before xtianity or judaism came about!

[Enobarbus]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

I'm sorry, BT, but that argument is just silly. That incident you mention was a one-off. Never again does the bible mention any such thing.

Which then goes back to the whole covenant thing, which then goes back to the fact that there were people doing it a LONG time before xtianity or judaism came about!

Can't you get it into you singularly sinful and incomparably thick head that there is a difference between "intelligent" design and "perfect" design.

In the garden of Eden before the woman Eve gave into the serpent (women have been doing something similar ever since) Adam and Eve had no illness or other problems. With sin came illness and all the other problems that men are heir to. Savvy?

But there is no such explanation for your fictional goddess and god, is there? Why do they allow illness, evil, war, etc.

Answer that you heathen.

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

Eno, my dear, sweet, Eno, you know I'm not wiccan. The god and goddess belief is not what I hold.
Pagan, not wiccan. I'm surprised at you! You usually have a very good memory.

Anyway, back on topic.
You'd assume that if a being were designing the universe and had potential to make perfect design, why not do so?

Let's pretend for a moment that I think the bible god is real (which I do not). It's as though he was like 'oops, forgot to fix that...hmmm....how can I fix that....OH!! I know!! Make it a sign of the covenant! That way I can use it AND they won't think to blame me for my oops!! BOOYAH!!! Go me!!'

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

There's nothing funnier than a secularist pretending to understand Creation Science.

LOL!

[Rachael Van Helsing]

Re: Circumcision - how do you explain that with intelligent desig

There's nothing funnier than a secularist pretending to understand Creation Science.

LOL!

I'd have to say there is few things funnier than a blatant admission of defeat like the fine example above.