I was doing some thinking and I have a question for you bible thumpers, similar to my thread on how testicles contradict the idea of intelligent design.
In the bible, the view on circumcision is made perfectly clear:
Genesis 17:10
This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
Genesis 17:11
And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
Genesis 17:12
And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
Genesis 17:13
He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
Genesis 17:14
And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.
So as we can see here the biblical god clearly likes the tallywhacker to receive 'ye olde snip'.
Now, if this same biblical deity was indeed an intelligent designer, who not simply design the tallywhacker without the foreskin? Why leave it on there and then add all those extra rules about being circ'ed?
Well?
That hardly seems like intelligent design to me!
What do you bible thumpers have to say to this?
Honestly, the only thing you probably can say is that you think it went along the lines of this:
'And as the lord hath finished creating the tallywhacker and placed man in the garden, looking closely at this his creation, he noticed what was an unslightly thing in his eyes on the end of the newly created male rod. Thus looking, did he scratch his head, and sayeth: 'oops!' '

Intelligent deisgn and biblical creationism indeed. Bwahahahaha!!!!!
In the bible, the view on circumcision is made perfectly clear:
Genesis 17:10
This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
Genesis 17:11
And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
Genesis 17:12
And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
Genesis 17:13
He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
Genesis 17:14
And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.
So as we can see here the biblical god clearly likes the tallywhacker to receive 'ye olde snip'.
Now, if this same biblical deity was indeed an intelligent designer, who not simply design the tallywhacker without the foreskin? Why leave it on there and then add all those extra rules about being circ'ed?
Well?
That hardly seems like intelligent design to me!
What do you bible thumpers have to say to this?
Honestly, the only thing you probably can say is that you think it went along the lines of this:
'And as the lord hath finished creating the tallywhacker and placed man in the garden, looking closely at this his creation, he noticed what was an unslightly thing in his eyes on the end of the newly created male rod. Thus looking, did he scratch his head, and sayeth: 'oops!' '

Intelligent deisgn and biblical creationism indeed. Bwahahahaha!!!!!


Comment