[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Were there cockaroaches in the land of NOD?

Of course. All creatures were created by God in The Creation.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

I meant what experiments did they perform to test their SG hypothesis? What were the results? Surely they kept records.

Joan Oró i Florensa
John Burdon Sanderson Haldane
Stanley Lloyd Miller
Alexander Ivanovich Oparin

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Were there cockaroaches in the land of NOD?

I see that your embarrassment here yesterday has not caused you to undergo an agonizing reassessment of your juvenile behavior. The Godly Pastors here have the patience of Job, but there are limits.

A better question might be when is little moofy going to get banned?

[Goatski]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Moofy,

Genesis 1: 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

Genesis 5: 2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

Adam is all of humanity and not just a singular personage. Eve refers to all the women. Cain and Abel refer to two types of people. The Bible is highly allegorical.

Genesis 3: 20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.

[moofy]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Were are you getting the Wizard of Oz Space Aliens from? Spontaneous Generation is a natural phenomena. Like when messy sinner household suddenly get cockroaches, they spontaneously generate from nothingness. How is that magic? The Wizard of Oz is a just a story made up by someone pushing their social agenda. Nothing like The Bible.

Anyway the Pyramids were built by the Israelites, not UFOs.

Were there cockaroaches in the land of NOD?

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Spontaneous Generation is a natural phenomena. Like when messy sinner household suddenly get cockroaches, they spontaneously generate from nothingness.
No dear boy. They are scavengers - they are attracted to decaying food. That's why you find roaches in nasty places. Not sin, not spontaneous generation.

How is that magic? The Wizard of Oz is a just a story made up by someone pushing their social agenda. Nothing like The Bible.

Oh no - the Council of Nicea didn't have an agenda...

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

spontaneous generation. Now, that's the most intelligent answer I've heard on this forum to date. Let me make sure I understand you brother-V.

God goes through the trouble of creating Adam from the dust of the ground. Then, when Adam gets a little frisky he puts him to sleep, takes one of his ribs and forms a woman. THey screw up, get kicked out of the garden of Eden and eventually have two sons, one of whom, kills his brother. While all this is taking place in the garden of eden and surrounding area people are spontaneously generating a few hundred miles east in the land of OZ. Maybe it was the Wizard from this land of OZ that gave Cain his wife. Also, perhaps it was the Tin man who helped him survive his new found fugitive status.

Why not just say that the same aliens who built the pyramids are the ones who gave Cain his wife.

Were are you getting the Wizard of Oz Space Aliens from? Spontaneous Generation is a natural phenomena. Like when messy sinner household suddenly get cockroaches, they spontaneously generate from nothingness. How is that magic? The Wizard of Oz is a just a story made up by someone pushing their social agenda. Nothing like The Bible.

Anyway the Pyramids were built by the Israelites, not UFOs.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

spontaneous generation. Now, that's the most intelligent answer I've heard on this forum to date. Let me make sure I understand you brother-V.

God goes through the trouble of creating Adam from the dust of the ground. Then, when Adam gets a little frisky he puts him to sleep, takes one of his ribs and forms a woman. THey screw up, get kicked out of the garden of Eden and eventually have two sons, one of whom, kills his brother. While all this is taking place in the garden of eden and surrounding area people are spontaneously generating a few hundred miles east in the land of OZ. Maybe it was the Wizard from this land of OZ that gave Cain his wife. Also, perhaps it was the Tin man who helped him survive his new found fugitive status.

Why not just say that the same aliens who built the pyramids are the ones who gave Cain his wife.

If you want an incest question, why don't you pick someone closer to now.

After the flood, all that was left as humans was, Noah, his wife, and his 3 boys, Ham, Shem and Japheth (who also had wives). After the flood, the three boys and their wives had children, who would have had to have married each other in order to make the rest of mankind.

It's stupid to dwell on Cain and the land of Nod. When you can get the same results from asking about Ham, Shem and Japheth. But you aren't smart enough to frame your own questions.

In other places on this forum, Brother Prune and I have debated about the creation of man.

If you read the Bible (KJV1611) which you obviously HAVEN'T done! Heck, this is Genesis 1 stuff! You'd see...

Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

So you see God made man (MALE AND FEMALE) on the sixth day.

Now, lets go to Genesis 2.


Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

So, if we follow the Bible (KJV1611) linearly, Genesis 1 first, Genesis 2 second. We see that in Genesis 1:27, on the sixth day, God made man (humans); male and female. Then in Genesis 2:7, God made Adam.

So the land of Nod woman that Cain went and married would have been from the Genesis 1:27 creation of people.

So there was no incest for Cain. It wasn't his cousin, it wasn't his sister. The ONLY incest that matters (as I've said earlier) is from the children of Noah.

Hope this answers your questions.

Now, have you accepted Jesus as your Lord and Personal Saviour yet?

YIC
V

[moofy]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

spontaneous generation. Now, that's the most intelligent answer I've heard on this forum to date. Let me make sure I understand you brother-V.

God goes through the trouble of creating Adam from the dust of the ground. Then, when Adam gets a little frisky he puts him to sleep, takes one of his ribs and forms a woman. THey screw up, get kicked out of the garden of Eden and eventually have two sons, one of whom, kills his brother. While all this is taking place in the garden of eden and surrounding area people are spontaneously generating a few hundred miles east in the land of OZ. Maybe it was the Wizard from this land of OZ that gave Cain his wife. Also, perhaps it was the Tin man who helped him survive his new found fugitive status.

Why not just say that the same aliens who built the pyramids are the ones who gave Cain his wife.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Someone had to be considered the first Homo-sapien.

That someone either had another member of it's homo-erectus tribe/group/whatever it's called, also be born a homo sapien at the same time (and luckily enough of the opposite sex) or in order for it to produce the next homosapien, it had to have coupled with a homo erectus.

Do you disagree with this?

Prehistoric people didn't go about introducing themselve as Homo erectus or Homo sapiens, any more than a Brahma bull introduces himself as Bos indicus to a Holstein cow, who introduces herself as Bos taurus. Bos taurus and Bos indicus have similar enough DNA that they can produce viable offspring.
Homo erectus and early homo sapiens would have had similar enough DNA to produce viable offspring. Homo sapiens and a gorilla would not.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Evolution happens slowly. It starts with a small change in the genetic code of an individual within a species. If that mutation is beneficial, the individual stands a better chance of surviving to pass it on to further generations. So then the first ancestor was having sex with monkeys
For example, say you had some animal species with very short legs. One day, a litter is born, and one of the babies has much longer legs than all his siblings. We're talking about human evolution, apes don't have litters. As they getolder, those longer legs allow him to run faster and escape predators. He survives, breeds, and passes this trait on to some of his offspring. Those offspring who got the long legs gene are better equipped to survive than their short-legged counterparts, and they go on to breed and produce long-legged offspring. Jimmy the Greek got kicked off of CBS for saying this same thing many years ago. Over the course of many generations, you would find that what had been a species of short-legged animals had becoe a species of long-legged animals. Why are there short humans then? Why are monkey species all similar sizes?
Of course, over all these generations, other small genetic changes would have been occurring every now and again. And each of those changes would follow the same pattern as long legs. Eventually, over many many generations, you would have animlas that were so genetically different from their great-great-great-great-great...great-grandparents that their DNA would no longer be compatible. That's speciation (formation of a new species). It doesn't happen overnight.

Someone had to be considered the first Homo-sapien.

That someone either had another member of it's homo-erectus tribe/group/whatever it's called, also be born a homo sapien at the same time (and luckily enough of the opposite sex) or in order for it to produce the next homosapien, it had to have coupled with a homo erectus.

Do you disagree with this?

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

How does evolution work?

Did suddenly a group of monkey become humans?

Or perhaps the way evolution works is that there was a genetic mistake in the group of apes the produced a human like creature. Either a bunch of them all happened at once, OR, the first mutant monkey (your ancestor) had to have sex with a monkey.

If evolution were true, how come there are still apes?

V

Evolution happens slowly. It starts with a small change in the genetic code of an individual within a species. If that mutation is beneficial, the individual stands a better chance of surviving to pass it on to further generations.
For example, say you had some animal species with very short legs. One day, a litter is born, and one of the babies has much longer legs than all his siblings. As they getolder, those longer legs allow him to run faster and escape predators. He survives, breeds, and passes this trait on to some of his offspring. Those offspring who got the long legs gene are better equipped to survive than their short-legged counterparts, and they go on to breed and produce long-legged offspring. Over the course of many generations, you would find that what had been a species of short-legged animals had becoe a species of long-legged animals.
Of course, over all these generations, other small genetic changes would have been occurring every now and again. And each of those changes would follow the same pattern as long legs. Eventually, over many many generations, you would have animlas that were so genetically different from their great-great-great-great-great...great-grandparents that their DNA would no longer be compatible. That's speciation (formation of a new species). It doesn't happen overnight.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

That isn't how evolution works, V.

How does evolution work?

Did suddenly a group of monkey become humans?

Or perhaps the way evolution works is that there was a genetic mistake in the group of apes the produced a human like creature. Either a bunch of them all happened at once, OR, the first mutant monkey (your ancestor) had to have sex with a monkey.

If evolution were true, how come there are still apes?

V

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Ithe first "evolved" human from an ape, had to have had sex with a monkey, in order to propogate itself.


V

That isn't how evolution works, V.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

I find it even more humorous that an evilotunist would want to argue that Cain may or may not have had incest with either a sister or a neice, or great neice.

All the while not realizing the elephant in the room is that the first "evolved" human from an ape, had to have had sex with a monkey, in order to propogate itself.

Which is worse in the evolutionist's view?

Incest, or species cross breeding.

Given the choice I'd rather have sex with a cousin of mine, than a gorilla.

But that's just me, I'm not a sicko like the evolution believing people.

V