[lilith]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Moofy, in answer to your question, don't you know? Cain's wife was an alien, of course. She beamed him up to her big twirling UFO, the spaceship NOD, where he was probed like crazy then mated with the prettiest of the alien females. Duh.

Yes, I was being sarcastic.
The reason why they haven't answered your question is because they can't. The bible, being as full of holes as it is, never explains really well, where the other people came from. Not to mention if it were incest, how the genetic problems arising from incest would have been overcome. One of the many, many reasons why the bible is rather, how do you say....full of it. Shite, that is.

Indeed it is - though I HAVE heard Christians put forward the theory that if incest did take place,it would have NO genetic repercussions - because god created "pure" beings!
People actually believe this stuff...presumably,otherwise sane people. Possibly.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Indeed it is - though I HAVE heard Christians put forward the theory that if incest did take place,it would have NO genetic repercussions - because god created "pure" beings!
People actually believe this stuff...presumably,otherwise sane people. Possibly.

Wow - you can use the word "sane" on the Landover forum with a straight face? I'm impressed!

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Indeed it is - though I HAVE heard Christians put forward the theory that if incest did take place,it would have NO genetic repercussions - because god created "pure" beings!
People actually believe this stuff...presumably,otherwise sane people. Possibly.

Don't be silly, there was no incest. Have any of you ever heard of "spontaneous generation"? The conditions were right in the Land of Nod for Cain to have a wife, so a wife, who was not his sister, for him spontaneously came into being. For those smarty pants who say "spontaneous generation" is just a second creation of God, so therefor the false scripture of Post-Adamism, no it is not. Spontaneous Generation is a completely natural process documented and proved by Christian Scientists. There reason why no one learns about it is the Evilutionists suppressed to for their wicked monkey man theory.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Don't be silly, there was no incest. Have any of you ever heard of "spontaneous generation"? The conditions were right in the Land of Nod for Cain to have a wife, so a wife, who was not his sister, for him spontaneously came into being. For those smarty pants who say "spontaneous generation" is just a second creation of God, so therefor the false scripture of Post-Adamism, no it is not. Spontaneous Generation is a completely natural process documented and proved by Christian Scientists. There reason why no one learns about it is the Evilutionists suppressed to for their wicked monkey man theory.

It figures that a TC would still believe in something that had been as soundly refuted as spontaneous generation.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

It figures that a TC would still believe in something that had been as soundly refuted as spontaneous generation.

The same agenda driven scientist who "discovered" evolution were the ones who "disproved" spontaneous generation. How can you take the word of someone who will go to such elaborate lengths to perpetuate a hoax, even after it has long been disproved? We at Landover certainly will not.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

The same agenda driven scientist who "discovered" evolution were the ones who "disproved" spontaneous generation. How can you take the word of someone who will go to such elaborate lengths to perpetuate a hoax, even after it has long been disproved? We at Landover certainly will not.

So how exactly did the Landover "scientists" "prove" spontaneous generation?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

So how exactly did the Landover "scientists" "prove" spontaneous generation?

With the aid of Jesus. GLORY!

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

With the aid of Jesus. GLORY!

I meant what experiments did they perform to test their SG hypothesis? What were the results? Surely they kept records.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

I find it even more humorous that an evilotunist would want to argue that Cain may or may not have had incest with either a sister or a neice, or great neice.

All the while not realizing the elephant in the room is that the first "evolved" human from an ape, had to have had sex with a monkey, in order to propogate itself.

Which is worse in the evolutionist's view?

Incest, or species cross breeding.

Given the choice I'd rather have sex with a cousin of mine, than a gorilla.

But that's just me, I'm not a sicko like the evolution believing people.

V

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Ithe first "evolved" human from an ape, had to have had sex with a monkey, in order to propogate itself.


V

That isn't how evolution works, V.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

That isn't how evolution works, V.

How does evolution work?

Did suddenly a group of monkey become humans?

Or perhaps the way evolution works is that there was a genetic mistake in the group of apes the produced a human like creature. Either a bunch of them all happened at once, OR, the first mutant monkey (your ancestor) had to have sex with a monkey.

If evolution were true, how come there are still apes?

V

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

How does evolution work?

Did suddenly a group of monkey become humans?

Or perhaps the way evolution works is that there was a genetic mistake in the group of apes the produced a human like creature. Either a bunch of them all happened at once, OR, the first mutant monkey (your ancestor) had to have sex with a monkey.

If evolution were true, how come there are still apes?

V

Evolution happens slowly. It starts with a small change in the genetic code of an individual within a species. If that mutation is beneficial, the individual stands a better chance of surviving to pass it on to further generations.
For example, say you had some animal species with very short legs. One day, a litter is born, and one of the babies has much longer legs than all his siblings. As they getolder, those longer legs allow him to run faster and escape predators. He survives, breeds, and passes this trait on to some of his offspring. Those offspring who got the long legs gene are better equipped to survive than their short-legged counterparts, and they go on to breed and produce long-legged offspring. Over the course of many generations, you would find that what had been a species of short-legged animals had becoe a species of long-legged animals.
Of course, over all these generations, other small genetic changes would have been occurring every now and again. And each of those changes would follow the same pattern as long legs. Eventually, over many many generations, you would have animlas that were so genetically different from their great-great-great-great-great...great-grandparents that their DNA would no longer be compatible. That's speciation (formation of a new species). It doesn't happen overnight.

[Brother V]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Evolution happens slowly. It starts with a small change in the genetic code of an individual within a species. If that mutation is beneficial, the individual stands a better chance of surviving to pass it on to further generations. So then the first ancestor was having sex with monkeys
For example, say you had some animal species with very short legs. One day, a litter is born, and one of the babies has much longer legs than all his siblings. We're talking about human evolution, apes don't have litters. As they getolder, those longer legs allow him to run faster and escape predators. He survives, breeds, and passes this trait on to some of his offspring. Those offspring who got the long legs gene are better equipped to survive than their short-legged counterparts, and they go on to breed and produce long-legged offspring. Jimmy the Greek got kicked off of CBS for saying this same thing many years ago. Over the course of many generations, you would find that what had been a species of short-legged animals had becoe a species of long-legged animals. Why are there short humans then? Why are monkey species all similar sizes?
Of course, over all these generations, other small genetic changes would have been occurring every now and again. And each of those changes would follow the same pattern as long legs. Eventually, over many many generations, you would have animlas that were so genetically different from their great-great-great-great-great...great-grandparents that their DNA would no longer be compatible. That's speciation (formation of a new species). It doesn't happen overnight.

Someone had to be considered the first Homo-sapien.

That someone either had another member of it's homo-erectus tribe/group/whatever it's called, also be born a homo sapien at the same time (and luckily enough of the opposite sex) or in order for it to produce the next homosapien, it had to have coupled with a homo erectus.

Do you disagree with this?

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

Someone had to be considered the first Homo-sapien.

That someone either had another member of it's homo-erectus tribe/group/whatever it's called, also be born a homo sapien at the same time (and luckily enough of the opposite sex) or in order for it to produce the next homosapien, it had to have coupled with a homo erectus.

Do you disagree with this?

Prehistoric people didn't go about introducing themselve as Homo erectus or Homo sapiens, any more than a Brahma bull introduces himself as Bos indicus to a Holstein cow, who introduces herself as Bos taurus. Bos taurus and Bos indicus have similar enough DNA that they can produce viable offspring.
Homo erectus and early homo sapiens would have had similar enough DNA to produce viable offspring. Homo sapiens and a gorilla would not.

[moofy]

Re: A question asked by evolutionist all the time

spontaneous generation. Now, that's the most intelligent answer I've heard on this forum to date. Let me make sure I understand you brother-V.

God goes through the trouble of creating Adam from the dust of the ground. Then, when Adam gets a little frisky he puts him to sleep, takes one of his ribs and forms a woman. THey screw up, get kicked out of the garden of Eden and eventually have two sons, one of whom, kills his brother. While all this is taking place in the garden of eden and surrounding area people are spontaneously generating a few hundred miles east in the land of OZ. Maybe it was the Wizard from this land of OZ that gave Cain his wife. Also, perhaps it was the Tin man who helped him survive his new found fugitive status.

Why not just say that the same aliens who built the pyramids are the ones who gave Cain his wife.