[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

back to the point, in your own words, describe the things i mentioned earlier.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

back to the point, in your own words, describe the things i mentioned earlier.

If the entire universe and all things contained in it where created by the Big Bang, and we all evolved from the ooze found on the bottom of the ocean, as you wish us to believe. Then who created the big bang?

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

If the entire universe and all things contained in it where created by the Big Bang, and we all evolved from the ooze found on the bottom of the ocean, as you wish us to believe. Then who or whom created the big bang?

who ever said i thought the big bang theory was accurate? there isnt enough proof for it to say it for sure happened. only real thing going for it is the expanding universe and the microwave spectrum. like i said, im agnostic not atheist. i dont disprove a god nor do i accept it. there isnt proof so i dont know.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

who ever said i thought the big bang theory was accurate? there isnt enough proof for it to say it for sure happened. only real thing going for it is the expanding universe and the microwave spectrum. like i said, im agnostic not atheist. i dont disprove a god nor do i accept it. there isnt proof so i dont know.

Well I guess that leaves God as the creator. Tell me why do you hate Jesus so much that you would renounce His Father as Creator of all things? Do you really want to make Jesus weep?

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Well I guess that leaves God as the creator. Tell me why do you hate Jesus so much that you would renounce His Father as Creator of all things? Do you really want to make Jesus weep?

no it actually doesnt. it just means we havent found the answer yet. it will probably take thousands of years before we make a huge discovery of our universe. and i dont hate jesus. i believe he was a man that was a very good speaker with very good morals. but my way of thinking goes the same with muslim, hindu, etc. i just dont know about a higher power. it hasnt been proven

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

no it actually doesnt. it just means we havent found the answer yet. it will probably take thousands of years before we make a huge discovery of our universe. and i dont hate jesus. i believe he was a man that was a very good speaker with very good morals. but my way of thinking goes the same with muslim, hindu, etc. i just dont know about a higher power. it hasnt been proven

Son the answers you seek are found in the pages of the KJV1611. You were once a Baptist did you read the Bible? What more proof do you need, look around you every thing you see is a result of God. Jesus was not a hinidoo or a mooslim. Why have you turned your back on Jesus?

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

right, the KJV of the bible was formed in 1604 C.E. translated off of greek and hebrew writings that had no sentence structure, punctuation, or really ending. the console that put them together guessed what it should have sounded like to the best of their abilities. they also threw out some of the gospels. (google the lost gospels. the gospel of Mary Magdalene should be one of them) yes i read the bible and jesus was a jew.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

right, the KJV of the bible was formed in 1604 C.E. translated off of greek and hebrew writings that had no sentence structure, punctuation, or really ending. the console that put them together guessed what it should have sounded like to the best of their abilities. they also threw out some of the gospels. (google the lost gospels. the gospel of Mary Magdalene should be one of them) yes i read the bible and jesus was a jew.

Would you please learn what your talking about. The Gospel of Mary wasn't included because it wasn't "discovered" until 1896. It is not considered a "gospel" by Biblical scholars and there's no real proof that it isn't a fraud as the papyrus has been dated to the 5th century.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

right, the KJV of the bible was formed in 1604 C.E. translated off of greek and hebrew writings that had no sentence structure, punctuation, or really ending. the console that put them together guessed what it should have sounded like to the best of their abilities. they also threw out some of the gospels. (google the lost gospels. the gospel of Mary Magdalene should be one of them) yes i read the bible and jesus was a jew.

Son If God would have wanted the so called lost gospels put in the Bible, He would have added them.

Now I will say this one time and one time only Jesus was not a damn Jew!

[Levi Jones]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

right, the KJV of the bible was formed in 1604 C.E. translated off of greek and hebrew writings that had no sentence structure, punctuation, or really ending. the console that put them together guessed what it should have sounded like to the best of their abilities. they also threw out some of the gospels. (google the lost gospels. the gospel of Mary Magdalene should be one of them) yes i read the bible and jesus was a jew.

What?? The translators of the KJV didn't toss out any Gospels.
The "Gospel of Mary Magdalene" was discovered in fragments in 1896. Not even the hell bound catlicks consider it canonical.

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

it was found in 1896 because it was thrown out. the lost gospels were either hidden or burned. and yes the gospel was written in the 5th century, but its not that far off from matthew, mark, luke, and john. and look up bishop john spong or bart d. ehrman and hear what they have to say

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

it was found in 1896 because it was thrown out. the lost gospels were either hidden or burned. and yes the gospel was written in the 5th century, but its not that far off from matthew, mark, luke, and john. and look up bishop john spong or bart d. ehrman and hear what they have to say

Who threw them out? Did you see them do it or are you relying on Bart Simpson? If the so called gospel of Mary was burned how could it be found in 1896? Hey are those guys you mentioned Mormons ? May be Joe Smith found the missing gospels buried with his gold plates

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

Did you see them do it or are you relying on Bart Simpson?

did you see god create the earth or are you relying on some sheepherders?

[Levi Jones]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

it was found in 1896 because it was thrown out. the lost gospels were either hidden or burned. and yes the gospel was written in the 5th century, but its not that far off from matthew, mark, luke, and john. and look up bishop john spong or bart d. ehrman and hear what they have to say

You just said it was the translators of the KJV in 1604 who threw them out.

Now you're backpedaling on that?

[James Dewitt]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

You just said it was the translators of the KJV in 1604 who threw them out.

Now you're backpedaling on that?

He said they were found in 1896, the lost gospels were either hidden or burned. If they were burned how could they be found in 1896? I smell a load of BS