[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

i personally think they were a series of stories that have been brought together in the 7th century C.E. no more, no less. trust me i've been brought up and baptized baptist in mississippi and ive heard everything about the bible and condemnation of hell if i dont take the bible literally. then i started questioning.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

i personally think they were a series of stories that have been brought together in the 7th century C.E. no more, no less. trust me i've been brought up and baptized baptist in mississippi and ive heard everything about the bible and condemnation of hell if i dont take the bible literally. then i started questioning.

In other words you bent over, waggeled your backside at Satan and screamed "take me" at him friend. You depraved lust for virtual spiritual demonic sex is merely a perversion, not wisdom. "Questioning" is spiritually the same as putting on 9" heals and cruising main street for "dates" from johns.

No friend, the fact that The Bible looks like a confusing collection of stories written by an easily mislead sadistic control freak is PROOF that God, and only God as we TRUE Christians know Him could have written The Bible. God's perfect knowledge and perfect wisdom is far beyond the understanding of man. Therefore anything written by God would appear to us humans as a contradicting mess. The Bible is such a mess, therefor God wrote it.

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

sure man haha you're so right. satan took over my body thats why i know evolution is a fact. i dont kill people, nor steal, nor cheat but because i think outside the box, the devil took over me. you know, if you would actually open up and take a collegiate biology class, maybe you might question also. btw im agnosic, not a satanist.

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

*agnostic

[David McCoy]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I'm going to answer every single one of those questions:

Account for the missing land sharks
If we evolved from fish, why haven’t sharks, who according to your theory predate us, evolved into land animals and are hunting us?
-Because the sharks are a necessary part of marine life and without them, there would be far too many fish in the oceans. They didn't evolve because, by natural selection, their genetic line wasn't given the genetic mutation necessary in order to evolve.

Explain floods on Mars with out the Great Flood of the Bible
If Noah’s flood didn’t happen then how do explain the evidence of a great flood on Mars?
-There was water on Mars previously. It wasn't brought there by a flood on Earth. Easy enough.

Account for fools
If evolution is survival of the fittest then how do explain the continued survival of unsuccessful groups of stupid humans?
-Because as we evolved, we determined it was inhumane to kill people just because they were stupid.

Explain why human's aren't perfect
If we are evolving why don’t we have third arms now?
-Perhaps because third arms aren't necessary yet, or maybe because if we do need them, our genes are still mutating in order to evolve.

Explain infant murder
If we are evolved to nature our young then how do you secular humanist explain your groups pathological desire to kill yours with abortions?
-Because we evolved and discovered these things called PLANS FOR THE FUTURE, some of which don't include children. Some people don't consider a child their young unless they have actually given birth to the child.

Why no bodies?
If humanity was roughly a million people living at one time. If the human race is 150,000 years old like you maintain that means there have been 150,000,000,000 who lived before the current era. If each corpse takes up 3 by 6 feet then that means the remains of human ancestors cover 1350 billion square feet of the earth! Why are we not buried under the remains of 150 billion people?
-Because their remains are underneath us. The bodies decomposed into dirt, and as people usually don't just stand still for their entire lifetime, we step on top of the dirt.

Were do angels and demons fit into the Evolutionist tree of life?
Please explain the earliest common ancestor with all animals, angles and demons. What is their ancestry and transitional form?
-That's a stupid question. In Atheism, angels and demons don't exist, therefore there needn't be an explanation for them. A common ancestor for all animals is groups of various cells that evolved in order to continue surviving.

Explain talking snake in the garden threw evolution.
Please tell me when serpents lost the power of speech and the process with which it happened. Please include any fossil of impaired speech snakes.
-There was no talking snake in the Garden of Eden. It was just part of the Bible, which, just as easily as it could be the truth, could be a giant book of lies. Serpents never had the power of speech. They were not selected to have this gift, just as we weren't selected to be dozens of feet long and have forked tongues and fangs.

Explain the Loch Ness Monster threw evolution.
I find it hard to believe that a whole species can sustain itself from so few individuals as observed in Loch Ness. Sounds like a hole in your theory to me.
-It's a genetic mutation from a prehistoric species that has managed to survive. It's possible that it is one being that has managed to live for millions of years, because a genetic mutation allowed it to do so. It's possible that there are more creatures like it in uninhabited areas of the Earth, and the Loch Ness Monster is offspring of those creatures. Or maybe it just doesn't exist?

If evolution is true, then why don't trees stretch up to the stratosphere?
Scientists say that trees grow taller and taller because natural selection forces them to compete for light with other trees. However, they have supposedly had hundreds of millions of years to evolve, but the tallest tree in the world is a mere 370 feet tall.

If evolution were true, we should be living in pitch dark, because the entire troposphere would be encased in a big sheet of tree leaves. Asked by Pastor Billy-Rueben
-Because there has not yet been a need for them to grow so tall. They are in fact growing taller and taller, but as the tallest tree is only 370 feet tall, why is there a need for other trees to grow to 371 feet? Especially if they aren't anywhere near this tree.

Why don't we act like monkeys
If we are evolved from monkeys why do we behave like them; service our selves constantly an throw our feces about? Asked by Eight or Better
-Because we have evolved and discovered methods of servicing ourselves without eating bugs off other people's backs, and we've become smart enough that we've established basic public etiquette. Basically, it's not okay to (publicly) throw your poop around because we've decided it's unclean.

Why are there still monkey?
Evolution predicts the stronger species (humans) would crush and exterminate the weaker species(monkeys) it evolved from. Asked by ChristianSoldier
-Again, certain genetic lines did not mutate in order to evolve. As we evolved into humans, we became civil and learned that it was inhumane to kill other species just for the sake of wiping the planet of them. Plus, monkeys are not necessarily a weaker species. They've survived this long.

Please account for quick extinctions.
According to evolution theory it takes millions of years for a species to go extinct. Yet we have examples of species dying out in a few hunderd years like the Dodo. Please account for this.
-There are multiple reasons. Perhaps they were just popular prey. Perhaps they existed for more than just a few hundred years, but their existence before then just hasn't been identified.

Were are ancestors and fossilizes remains of the dragon, satyr and unicorn?
I would say the lack of fossils for these three creatures presents a clear gap in the record.
-A lack of fossils has many perfectly reasonable causes. Maybe there just weren't any dragons, satyrs, or unicorns. Maybe they existed so long ago that their remains are buried so far underground we haven't found them yet.

Why are no human ancestors mentioned in The Bible?
The very fact that Neandertals, Homo-Erectuces are not mentioned in The Bible proves they are made up. I mean you would think God would have mentioned them 6,000 years ago when He wrote The Bible. duh.
-Again, in Atheism, there is no God. Please stop backing up all your arguments with the statement that God never said anything about something in the Bible. I believe the Bible was made up by a person smart enough to cover all his/her bases, but for the sake of their story, did not mention Neanderthals.

Explain wasps with evolution.
Wasp paralyze spiders and then implant their young in them to feed on living, but helpless insect. If evolution was true them spiders would have anti-wasp poison in their blood. But they don’t. The only way you can get such a horrific death as those countless spiders suffer is threw the power of God.
-Because the spiders' DNA has not yet mutated in order to change the genetic makeup of their blood.

How could Cain could procreate with his sisters if evolution was true?
If can was getting busy with his sister like The Bible relates then the human race should be a race of inbreed deformities like the English Royal Family. Instead we see the general population is healthy. This can only happen if Cain and his sister were of the pure first generation after Adam not corrupted by sins yet.
-Cain never existed because the Bible was written by a person looking for a quick buck. He never existed and he never procreated with his sister.

The Genealogy of Henry III
The "Evidence From Genealogy" display, donated by Edgar Nurnberg, is one of the more favorite displays of our visitors. These scrolls from the Lambeth Palace in England trace the genealogy of King Henry the 6th back to Adam and Eve.
Asked by Heathen Basher 8/18/09
-Because he's royalty. Somewhere along his ancestry, somebody decided to make a forgery so that they could be traced back to Adam and Eve so they would appear more important than other royal families.

Unicorn Horns
What so-called "evoloutionary role" does the horn on a unicorn play? I was taught evolutionary theory, and I can't figure it out! Asked by H. Montague Worthington's 8/24/09
-What kind of question is that? If you are meaning to ask why the unicorn has a horn, that would be because it's environment required that it had one, either to fend off enemies or find food, or whatever survival technique was found pertinent.

Transitional fossils for single celled organism.
The Darwinists would have us believe that life evolved from single-celled organisms to more complicated forms. If that's true, then we should expect to see intermediaries between organisms with one cell and organisms with millions/billions/trillions of cells, but that's exactly what we don't see. Where are all the two-celled organisms that we should see if evolution was true? Where are all the five-celled organisms or twelve-celled organisms? Are we supposed to believe that 50 million amoebas randomly assembled into a fully formed flatworm by chance? Asked by Pastor Billy-Reuben. 8/25/09
-Perhaps we just haven't found these intermediary creatures yet. You're asking questions under the assumption that everything about the universe is known.

Why is there still mud?
Darwinists claim that life originate in mud. If you really believe that a big pile of mud turned into a fish, which sprouted legs and arms and turned into monkeys, which turned into human beings, then you're more stupid than I thought. For a start, if that's true, why's there still mud around, and why do babies not have tails like monkeys when they're born? Asked by Rachel Pierce 11/4/09
-Because the parents of these children were modern human beings, therefore the child is as well. Mud still exists because not all mud contains the mutated cells necessary to bear life.

Why don't chemicals think?
If our brains are just a mishmash of biochemistry, how come chemicals like gasoline or bug spray can't think? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
-Who's to say chemicals can't think? Perhaps they can, they're just incapable of vocalizing their thoughts.

Why don't we have natural clothing?
People have been wearing clothes for thousands of years. Why haven't our bodies evolved natural clothes that come out of our skin then? Rev. Jim Osborne 1/11/10
-Because we've been wearing clothes, therefore our bodies don't need to create their own coverings. We have evolved and with our evolution, we have learned how to create clothes for ourselves. Our bodies have better reasons to mutate.

You said one answer would be helpful. I answered all of them. Enjoy.

[David McCoy]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That's not plagiarism, it's called common sense. You should get some. I have no sources, they're just facts that I've picked up over the years. Also, don't call me "boy". I'm a girl. In fact, I'm happy I'm a different gender. I'm quite positive if I shared the same anatomy as you, I'd shoot myself. You're such a chauvinist pig it's ridiculous.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That's not plagiarism, it's called common sense. You should get some. I have no sources, they're just facts that I've picked up over the years. Also, don't call me "boy". I'm a girl. In fact, I'm happy I'm a different gender. I'm quite positive if I shared the same anatomy as you, I'd shoot myself. You're such a chauvinist pig it's ridiculous.

So not only do you not know whether you're a boy or a girl, now you're arguing with yourself and accusing yourself of plagiarism?

Maybe one of the voices in your head can tell you about Jesus. Especially considering how sorry your attempts at explanations are. Really, take a look through the thread, compared to others answers, yours were really simplistic and silly.

[David McCoy]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So not only do you not know whether you're a boy or a girl, now you're arguing with yourself and accusing yourself of plagiarism?

Maybe one of the voices in your head can tell you about Jesus. Especially considering how sorry your attempts at explanations are. Really, take a look through the thread, compared to others answers, yours were really simplistic and silly.

I am a girl. It would appear as though I'm the only woman on this forum. All the rest on this forum are perfectly okay with being beaten and are fine with being servants to your husbands.

And no, I'm not crazy, and I'm not arguing with myself. I was docked 99 points by Levi Jones because I didn't "cite my sources". I was simply replying to him.

And I don't care how you find my answers. I have answers for my beliefs. Give me solid answers for yours. Give me solid evidence that the Bible was written by God and God is real. Oh yeah, and saying that God's real because the Bible says he is doesn't count. I want an actual explanation.

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

So not only do you not know whether you're a boy or a girl, now you're arguing with yourself and accusing yourself of plagiarism?

Maybe one of the voices in your head can tell you about Jesus. Especially considering how sorry your attempts at explanations are. Really, take a look through the thread, compared to others answers, yours were really simplistic and silly.

HA dont even start with me! i bet you cant tell me a single thing about biology or the human psychology or the nature of physics. stop playing with your imaginary friends. think outside the box fundy

[Levi Jones]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I am a girl. It would appear as though I'm the only woman on this forum. All the rest on this forum are perfectly okay with being beaten and are fine with being servants to your husbands.

And no, I'm not crazy, and I'm not arguing with myself. I was docked 99 points by Levi Jones because I didn't "cite my sources". I was simply replying to him.

And I don't care how you find my answers. I have answers for my beliefs. Give me solid answers for yours. Give me solid evidence that the Bible was written by God and God is real. Oh yeah, and saying that God's real because the Bible says he is doesn't count. I want an actual explanation.

David, it's called faith. Plain and simple. Haven't you heard even John 3:16? He who believes will have everlasting life?

I would think a kind and "tolerant" atheist chap like yourself could wrap your head around the fact that others might have different beliefs.

We believe and follow. You don't. If I'm right, I wake up in the Ever After. If I'm wrong, nothing happens.

If you're wrong, you will sizzle in a burning lake of sulphur and fire that burns forever and ever.

Now, doesn't that make you think?

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

HA dont even start with me! i bet you cant tell me a single thing about biology or the human psychology or the nature of physics. stop playing with your imaginary friends. think outside the box fundy

You mean like the difference between gradualism and punctuated equilibria? That kind of thing? Do you even understand the difference between Darwinian and Lamarckian evolution?

Just because we dismiss it, doesn't mean we don't know about it. I used to study this stuff all the time, but the more I read the more I realized that none of the scientists really "knew" it was all guesses and conjecture.

Give me solid evidence that the Bible was written by God and God is real. Oh yeah, and saying that God's real because the Bible says he is doesn't count. I want an actual explanation.

Okay, give me solid evidence that God doesn't exist, or that evolution is true. Oh yeah and saying that you read it in a text book or Dawkins says doesn't count.

Go ahead, I won't hold my breath.

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

"You mean like the difference between gradualism and punctuated equilibria? That kind of thing? Do you even understand the difference between Darwinian and Lamarckian evolution?

Just because we dismiss it, doesn't mean we don't know about it."

Lamarckian evolution was before darwin. the theory changed due to observation when darwin knew the species do not produce to their offspring from the changes that happen in the parent's life. The P1 generation horse loses a leg hypothetically, the F1 generation or offspring will have two pairs of legs as the genetic makeup allows. mutations only occur in "glitches" in the DNA either by gene deletion, insertion, or point mutation (the nucleotides switch most commonly purine with purine or pyrimidine with pyrimidine)

and the following quote,
look up Bishop John Spong

progressive christian that actually followed darwin's footsteps and determined he was right

[David McCoy]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I find it funny that you believe it will be so difficult for me to find evidence that you think you aren't going to have to find any at all.

"For instance, the resemblance in the skeleton structure of apes and humans has been correlated to the homologous genetic sequences within each species as strong evidence for common ancestry." (http://www.allaboutscience.org/evolution-of-man.htm)

Your turn. Go ahead and give me evidence that God is real, my eyes are open. I won't hold my breath, either, as I do believe it will be harder for you to find evidence than it was for me.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

I find it funny that you believe it will be so difficult for me to find evidence that you think you aren't going to have to find any at all.

"For instance, the resemblance in the skeleton structure of apes and humans has been correlated to the homologous genetic sequences within each species as strong evidence for common ancestry." (http://www.allaboutscience.org/evolution-of-man.htm)

Your turn. Go ahead and give me evidence that God is real, my eyes are open. I won't hold my breath, either, as I do believe it will be harder for you to find evidence than it was for me.

That's from a text book. Sorry, can't use text books. Anyway, that talks about the "theory of evolution" I thought you were going to offer proof. I mean the first sentence of the article is

The modern theory concerning the evolution of man proposes...

Yep, that's solid proof right there.

As for proof of God, just get out of your basement and look around. How else would everything fit together so well?

There's also the fact that Bible predictions come true. Here's a good list

http://www.parentalguide.com/Documents/Bible_Desk/proof_bible_true.htm

But yeah, you stick with the "ur so dum LOL" arguments there. They really make you sound like the mental giant that you truly are.

[Aformerbaptist]

Re: Questions that evolutionist can’t answer

That's from a text book. Sorry, can't use text books. Anyway, that talks about the "theory of evolution" I thought you were going to offer proof. I mean the first sentence of the article is

The modern theory concerning the evolution of man proposes...

Yep, that's solid proof right there.

As for proof of God, just get out of your basement and look around. How else would everything fit together so well?

There's also the fact that Bible predictions come true. Here's a good list

http://www.parentalguide.com/Documents/Bible_Desk/proof_bible_true.htm

But yeah, you stick with the "ur so dum LOL" arguments there. They really make you sound like the mental giant that you truly are.

quit using the bible to support the bible hypocrite. and ill play your game of your proof of how god exists. look at all the living organisms on earth thus evolution is a fact.