[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

I didn't say that Jesus was made up, I said that I believed some of the stories about him were.
Alexander the Great, while a real person, also had stories made up about him, including, interestingly enough, that he was the son of God.

So you are saying Alexander the Great's visit to the Oracle of Siwa is a myth? That the miraculous rain storm in the desert and flight of birds that led him to the Oracle are all made up? I am just curious why everything your pagan gods do is historically accurate while everything Jesus does is inherently suspect in your mind.

BTW I can see you are a big fan of Olympias with all the ball busting and snake "worshiping" she did.

[Old Iron Crotch]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

So you are saying Alexander the Great's visit to the Oracle of Siwa is a myth? That the miraculous rain storm in the desert and flight of birds that led him to the Oracle are all made up? I am just curious why everything your pagan gods do is historically accurate while everything Jesus does is inherently suspect in your mind.

He may well have visited the Oracle - lots of foks visited oracles back them.
As for the rain storem, hwo knows? It does occasionally rain in the desert. I don't for a moment believe that it was a miracle, however - just nature following its course.
The only thing I find about birds is that he used barley to sketch out a map on the ground, which the birds ate. Birds eat grain. No miracle there.

BTW I can see you are a big fan of Olympias with all the ball busting and snake "worshiping" she did.

Not particularly. You seem to have the erroneous idea that I dislike men. Not true - I get along just fine with most men.

[Andrew Shaw]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Yes, but how can they know if whales existed for millions of years if no million-year-old whales are around to prove it?

Generally they would carbon date whatever it is to tell the age of the item
but theres obviously no 'million year old whales' because theirs not million year old whale bones to carbon date.

[Andrew Shaw]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

As a Child I used to have a Pet Turtle.
Those lying Evil-Loo-shunaries say that Turtles are 200 Million years old.
Now my Turtle hatched out of an Egg while I watched it. That was only erm.....erm.....a couple of years ago.
Can they explain that?

No, of course they can't!!

What they meant was turtles have existed for 200 million years, the race, not an individual turtle..and your turtle isent the first turtle or anything although i dont think turtles have been around for that long..but then again if they werent..how could they be here now?

-just showing some constructive criticism.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Notice the part I highlighted. Even paid scientists are now admitting that whales are only hundreds of years old—not millions like the crypto-Kabbalists behind evolutionary theory would have you believe. And those are the oldest ones. When will they just admit that their little fairy tale is full of holes and isn't worth its weight in dung?



Side note: yet again, Canuckistani racism rears its ugly head. Notice that ONLY smelly eskimos are allowed to kill whales, so that they can use their oil and blubber as a lubricant for anal sex; white Christians are forbidden from laying so much as a finger on one. Jesus is not pleased.

Okay.

First off.

The spiecies commonly known as "whale" has been around for millions of years.

INDIVIDUEL whales live to a maximum of two hundred years.

Now, what you can't seem to diferenciate, is the idea behind ONE member of a spiecies, and the spiecies itself.

Let me explain it this way.

You're a human.

You are ONE human.

You live to, I hope, no more then 100 years.

Does this mean that humanity has been around for only 100 years?

Heck no!

And as for that "Canuckistan" remark.

Where on this earth is Canuckistan?

If you actually mean CANADA, we are nowhere near racist. ATLEAST not as much as the US.

We allow our Inuit folk to hunt as they've always done for thousands of years. Why?

Because, originally, it was THEIR land. They got there first. We have no right to tell them what they can, and cannot do on their land.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

The rest of your post is gibberish (you live in Soviet Canuckistan yet you haven't heard of it?!), but this sentence nearly stopped my heart:

You live to, I hope, no more then 100 years.

The DOF will be be notified about your death threat.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

The rest of your post is gibberish (you live in Soviet Canuckistan yet you haven't heard of it?!), but this sentence nearly stopped my heart:



The DOF will be be notified about your death threat.

Because only a moron can take a fact, and make it a threat.

[Brimstone]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Because only a moron can take a fact, and make it a threat.

Stop persecuting innocent Christians!

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Because only a moron can take a fact, and make it a threat.

Correct. You took the fact that I probably won't live past 100 on Earth and made it a threat by saying that you hoped I wouldn't. And you are indeed a moron!

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Correct. You took the fact that I probably won't live past 100 on Earth and made it a threat by saying that you hoped I wouldn't. And you are indeed a moron!

And you took the fact that I hoped you didn't live that long, and made it a threat.

Making you Baka^2.

[Andrew Shaw]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

A threat would be ' And i'll make sure you dont live to one hundred!'

He just said that he hopes you dont. It was just a statement on how he feels not a threat.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

I guess he'll have to tell that to the judge!

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Oppinions are not threats.

Therefore, I'm let free.

But, back to the topic.

Anything you wish to say?

Or are you too lazy to use google and try to find arguements?

[Brimstone]

More Clues That the Earth is Young

Evolution assumes that man dropped out of the trees 1 to 5 million years ago and became fully human approximately 100,000 years ago. Yet archeological records show civilization arising only about 5,000 years ago (based on evolutionary thinking). In other words, by evolutionary reasoning, it took mankind 95,000 years after becoming fully human to figure out that food could be produced by dropping a seed into the ground!

It has been estimated by evolutionary anthropologists that the earth could have easily supported 10 million hunter/gatherer type humans. To maintain an average of 10 million people, spread over the entire planet, with an average life span of 25 years, for the last 100,000 years . . . .would mean that 40 billion people had lived and died. Archeological evidence clearly shows that these "stone age" people buried their dead. Forty billion graves should be easy to find. Yet only a few thousand exist. The obvious implication is that people have been around for far less time.
Another indication of both a young earth and a confirmation of the worldwide flood is the scarcity of meteors in sedimentary rock layers. Although some meteors have been found in sedimentary layers, they are relatively rare. Meteors are easily identifiable, and many thousands have been identified and recovered from recent impacts on the planet’s surface. If most of the rock layers were laid down rapidly during the one year period of a worldwide flood, you would not expect to find many meteorites buried in only one year. However, if the sediment was laid down over billions of years, there should be multiple billions of meteorites buried within this sediment. The fact that we find so few is another possible evidence for the rapid accumulation of the sedimentary layers and a young earth.
Suppose you walked into an empty room and found a smoking cigar. You could assume that the cigar was very old and that it had only recently burst into flames, but the more logical conclusion would be that someone had recently been there to light it. The universe is full of similar "smoking cigars":

1. All planetary rings still exhibit intricacies which Should Have long ago disappeared.
2. All known comets burn up their material with each pass around the sun and Should Have a maximum life expectancy of 100,000 years.
3. The outer solar system planets should have long ago cooled off.
4. The spiral galaxies Should Have long ago un-spiraled, and the uneven dispersion of matter in the universe Should Have long ago dispersed.

Scientists working from the preconception that the universe is 10-20 billion years old have suggested controversial and complicated possibilities for how these types of transient phenomena could still exist but their explanations are based more on faith, not science. The simpler explanation is that these "smoking cigars" are smoking because they are young.
What about dating methods which do seem to indicate that things are very old ? As seen in the first article on dating methods, assumptions are everything. For instance, carbon-14 generation rate has never significantly changed. This method does not date the age of the earth but understanding it can have a profound effect on our interpretation of the "ice age" and the "stone age". A recent worldwide catastrophe would have caused an enormous change in the total amount of carbon on earth's biosphere. This event would completely invalidate one of the basic assumptions of the carbon-14 dating method (a known carbon-14 to carbon-12 ratio throughout the measurement period) and lead to excessively old dates for organisms alive shortly after this flood. This problem with carbon-14 dating assumptions will be described in detail in another article.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Another nail in the Darwinist coffin

Did you know that cutting and pasting other people's work and then posting it as your own is a federal and international crime? Do you think we are that stupid?