[murdythenumbskull]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Yet you believe that at some point in time (specifically, at the beginning of time) that entire infinity was condensed into a space smaller than head of a pin.

Time can lead on for infinity just as the dimensions of the universe can lead up to infinity, numbers can also work this way. You can make a number so close to zero, and then keep going. You can make a number as large as you want, and keep going. Infinity is relative to the matter time and dimension that holds the universe together, so yes, changing it to the size of a pinhead would not be destroying anything. In fact black holes do it all the time.

All that talk doesn't explain, where did matter come from? How can you create something from nothing - without a God?

Matter cannot be created. If this universe was not here, the matter would not be either.

You are not answering the question: where did the first life come from - how did the transition from inorganic to organic happen? I think that in labs you can create basic aminoacids, but the next step?

I told you from the structuring in the nuclei. Proteins provide the information and vehichles for all the work done, carbon structures create the organic membranes which are there workspaces.

wait, wait, what? How were they developed? From what?

Protein? Strands put together of nucleotides, the sequences fit with bonds and eventually complete large circuits of information like programs.

I thought that evolution assumed no participation of God?

What did the first cell reproduce, are you asking me to tell you the name of the first cell that ever existed in the universe was? There is no classification of it. Please take this seriously

You do realize that according to Darwinian theory, the mutations happen by chance - which means that in case of"abundance of land and shortening frontier of water" most species will simply die out, not adapt.

And when the mutations do happen in probability, what makes them stand out and survive from being stronger and well adapted...?

No, you shouldn't

My answer was also No inferred by the follow up sentence of I guess...

Isn't the evolution supposed to be based on evidence, not belief?

It's my opinion and what I believe, so yes.

Umm... don't protozoa (e.g.: amoeba) ring a bell?

Those are both of the Protista kingdom...moving on.

Darwinian and Lamarckian theories in one sentence, that must be a new record

growth of legs would either, thanks for reading.

Aren't you supposed to say something about dinosaurs with feathers and Archaeopteryx?

Dinosaurs could have most likely been feathered or partially feathered, we cannot positively determine that without a completely frozen specimen, as all we have is bone remains.

Avoiding the answer again

I answered Why and How, When and Where are completely irrelevant, could be anywhere from 250 Mya to 4000 years ago, either way I guarantee man did not record his first feelings on any kind of scripture like a boy band does.

So what was before Big Bang? Where did all the "everything" come from?

Possibly from a giant black hole, possibly from another universe. I know I won't be saying Harry Potter or any magical being waved his wand and poof everything in the universe existed, because that explains everything doesn't it?

Oh, really?

Faith means you are willing to full-heartedly believe something without any reassurance that it is actually right. Commitment means you will see to it that your goals will be met.

I really am sorry for all the grammatical mistakes. I have a lot of misused comma situations and semicolons that I did correct at one point but copied over the massive questionnaire and didn't realize they were all re-mistaken again. Like all those questions without question marks
For instance I put an It in front of Archaeologists. A to was supposed to be a too. Carbon and Carbon and Oxygen molecules, should just be one carbon.

Oh well that's what I get for not having my excellent grammatically correct girlfriend not look it over before I submit Thank you for reading and critiquing.

[NathanBrigsby]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

A quick inference to MurdyTheFrog. How can anything you say and do have ANY credibility when you've been branded with Satan's AIDS virus?

[murdythenumbskull]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

A quick inference to MurdyTheFrog. How can anything you say and do have ANY credibility when you've been branded with Satan's AIDS virus?

if requested I will give legitimate sources.

^
I like my aids and homer icons they are quite awesome.

[NathanBrigsby]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Hmm Murdy. What you call legitimate sources clearly come from monkey-raping darwinists who just want to justify their beastality tendencies. The fact you have AIDS clearly means you've been jumping into some butt enzymes as well so how can you have any educational values when all you have on your mind is gay sex in this case? Sodomites are never to be trusted or taken seriously.

1 Kings 14:24
And there were also sodomites in the land: and they did according to all the abominations of the nations which the Lord cast out before the children of Israel.

[murdythenumbskull]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Why do you keep bringing up bestiality and gay buttsex. Are you too busy fantasizing about gayfers and donkey screwing that you can't focus and stay on topic for one post?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Why do you keep bringing up bestiality and gay buttsex. Are you too busy fantasizing about gayfers and donkey screwing that you can't focus and stay on topic for one post?

And why are you here spewing hatred on God's favorite forum? Piss off!

[NathanBrigsby]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

In response to you and your fellow evolutionists Murdy, I direct you to Isaiah 56:10
His watchmen are blind: they are all ignorant, they are all dumb dogs, they cannot bark; sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber.

[Paragon of virtue]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

We of the Christian faith are honest. We have faith in a benevolent loving God who takes care of his own to the point of dying (and returning) for us. We name it and claim it true. It's beyond "science". Secularists can call it "supernatural" and we own it. Evilusionists on the other hand start in with the double talk. Matter can neither be created nor destroyed, according to the Evilutionist. Then asking where the "first" matter came from is a legitimate, non-trick question. If the Evilutionist is true to himself, and apart from God how could you expect sinful man to be truthful at all?, he has no answer for this. Put it simply, God wins again!!

[murdythenumbskull]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Actually I explained it thoroughly, if the universe did not exist there would be no matter. Since it apparently does exist all matter that is here in this collective dimension has been here and always will.

So my legitimate non-trick question is if God is what created all existence, then what created God?

Super-God? What created him? Ultra-God? Can't you see the silly redundancy of covering up real answers with made up stories?

[Pim Pendergast]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Actually I explained it thoroughly, if the universe did not exist there would be no matter. Since it apparently does exist all matter that is here in this collective dimension has been here and always will.

Rom 1:19-20 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.

Creation is evidence of God's existence. Life and the universe is so complex that we know it must have had a Designer. Life could not just have evolved. The universe could not just have always existed. Both require a Creator. And God, who is more complex than we could possibly comprehend or anything we might encounter in nature, was that Creator. God is eternal. He wasn't created.

Ps 90:2 Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou [art] God.

So my legitimate non-trick question is if God is what created all existence, then what created God?

Super-God? What created him? Ultra-God? Can't you see the silly redundancy of covering up real answers with made up stories?

I think you've answered your own question. Obviously that would be impossible.

[murdythenumbskull]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

It does not require a creator, that only postpones the debate of existence. You could believe that and consequently ignore every paradox that it raises, but it will not be what I and the majority of the world will follow.

The universe will not be as complex as you think it to be, all you have to do is get the drive to discover it's nature.
It's great to learn. Being able to pass down the knowledge of the world will aid our future generations in the advancement and progression of our kind.

[Sammy The Penitent]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

It's great to learn. Being able to pass down the knowledge of the world will aid our future generations in the advancement and progression of our kind.

Dear Murdy,

To learn what? That the so called scientists are wrong again? (Please read the thread Science get's it wrong YET AGAIN!!! ) They can't agree on anything for more than a minute without finding fault with their current line of reasoning.

Do you really want to feed this ever changing clap-trap to your children when the Bible provides all the answers you need?

Romans 1:20
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

YIC

[Didymus Much]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

...Since it apparently does exist all matter that is here in this collective dimension has been here and always will...

Science disagrees. A snippet, in nice easy language, from On the shores of the unknown by Joseph Silk, about one of the effects of quantum dynamics (I've highlighted the salient bits):

"The quantum theory asserts that a vacuum, even the most perfect vacuum devoid of any matter, is not really empty. Rather the quantum vacuum can be depicted as a sea of continuously appearing and disappearing [pairs of] particles that manifest themselves in the apparent jostling of particles that is quite distinct from their thermal motions. These particles are ‘virtual’, as opposed to real, particles. ...At any given instant, the vacuum is full of such virtual pairs, which leave their signature behind, by affecting the energy levels of atoms."

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QED_vacuum

I could go on, but frankly, trying to really understand that stuff hurts my brain even more than reading Gnostic literature (and that's saying something).

[murdythenumbskull]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

Science disagrees. A snippet, in nice easy language, from On the shores of the unknown by Joseph Silk, about one of the effects of quantum dynamics (I've highlighted the salient bits):



I could go on, but frankly, trying to really understand that stuff hurts my brain even more than reading Gnostic literature (and that's saying something).

I'm not sure what exactly you are referring to besides the fact that electromagnetic waves and many other particles in these spectrums that pass through such tested vacuum are always present. These do not allow any type of true vacuums to possess absolutely no particles. Matter is only changeable, not creatable/destroyable.

[Paragon of virtue]

Re: 20 Questions For Evilutionists

So my legitimate non-trick question is if God is what created all existence, then what created God?

I don't have to answer that. God is beyond the natural. There are no rules to define Him. He does not require a creator He is from everlasting to everlasting. The evilutionists must answer the question because they believe that matter is neither created nor destroyed.