X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aformerbaptist
    replied
    Re: The Sun: Millions of miles away?

    can you define fusion for me?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: The Sun: Millions of miles away?

    Originally posted by anonebuam View Post
    we use parallax to determine the distance of the closer stars to earth.



    however, at 1+ billion light years, we cannot measure the angular shift differential to compute the distance accurately. so we have to use other methods to determine the distance beyond that.
    Hey, friend. Welcome to our humble forum.

    Anyone can link to a wiki article about parallax and spout of a random factoid about it. Have you ever actually done the measurements yourself and then sat down to do your own calculations? We have.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Billy-Reuben
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Good work, Brother Jim. I always wondered how a star could be small enough that Jesus could hold seven of them in one hand (Rev 1:16, Rev 1:20, Rev 2:1), yet shine so brilliantly in the night sky, and being expertly cut flawless diamonds makes perfect sense.

    Of course, now that this news has been broken, I'm certain that the Joos who run the diamond cartel will be hiring out the space shuttle to harvest these diamonds, so prepare for the night sky to become less spectacular.

    Pastor Billy-Reuben

    Leave a comment:


  • anonebuam
    replied
    Re: The Sun: Millions of miles away?

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Anyone know the light refraction of a diamond? If we knew that we could calculate how far the stars are from earth.

    Now this is what science is about, drawing conclusions from sound observations and no wild speculation.
    we use parallax to determine the distance of the closer stars to earth.



    however, at 1+ billion light years, we cannot measure the angular shift differential to compute the distance accurately. so we have to use other methods to determine the distance beyond that.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Dewitt
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Now it makes sense stars are made of diamonds, when they explode the earth is showered with these.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Mrs. Rogers
    replied
    Re: The Sun: Millions of miles away?

    Originally posted by Rev. Jim Osborne View Post
    More likely God put the stars only 77,000 miles away so their light only takes a second to get here. Or they could be only 500 miles away as well. That makes sense since it goes along with the sun's distance.

    Either way, mathematics prove the stars are between 500 miles and 6 billion miles away. This is hard science, real science, not the crazy beliefs and blind faith of atheist scientists.
    Amen, Reverend -- your post is Creation Science at its mind-boggling and God-glorifying best. However, I find it easier to think of the stars being only 500 miles away, as opposed to 77,000 miles (6 billion miles defies logic). 77,000 miles is a terribly long distance to travel in one day, let alone one second!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Originally posted by MarkHenry View Post
    Hmmm. My 2 cent:

    Diamonds mainly refract light, not reflect. Unless light shines on them in a specific angle, almost no light will be reflected.

    Now if the diamonds would be placed IN the dome surrounding the world and the light would come from OUTSIDE of the dome, and the diamonds acted like a lense to guide the light towards us... that would be a better guess.


    just saying...
    And Christ tells us what the light that is being refracted it friend
    John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkHenry
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Hmmm. My 2 cent:

    Diamonds mainly refract light, not reflect. Unless light shines on them in a specific angle, almost no light will be reflected.

    Now if the diamonds would be placed IN the dome surrounding the world and the light would come from OUTSIDE of the dome, and the diamonds acted like a lense to guide the light towards us... that would be a better guess.


    just saying...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jed_Cassidy
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    I know some atheist is going to waltz in here and start asking for "proof". Because many pages of supporting Scripture isn't good enough for them, maybe this piece of photographic evidence will shut their traps.

    I obtained this photo through the same source as my one for the flat Earth.

    NASA's atheistic agenda attempts to subdue Biblical truth, but they'll have Hell to pay for it!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Ezekiel Bathfire
    replied
    Re: The Sun: Millions of miles away?

    Originally posted by Rev. Jim Osborne View Post
    [...] I happened to notice a sign on display regarding carbon emissions from cars. Carbon! The epiphany struck me.

    Since we know the sun is essentially a large lump of coal (carbon), this piles on more evidence of the stars actually made up of diamonds (carbon). Coal and diamonds are one in the same thing! This also proves that there is specific, intelligent design in the Heavens and more evidence of God's existence.

    [...]This would explain why the moon is white. Furthermore, white carbon has the property of splitting a beam of light into two beams. [...]
    This is so in keeping with Scripture, Rev. Jim!

    Saint Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians spells it out more clearly -- the sun and the stars are different.

    1 Corinthians 15:40-41
    There are celestial bodies and there are terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another, There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory.


    The three sorts of Carbon, laid out before our eyes!

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Jim Osborne
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Originally posted by A Follower View Post
    You are correct, stars indeed consist of diamond, but not just any diamond, star diamond is even harder than regular diamond. See this news article from 2 days ago:





    The researchers do keep mentioning carbon though, so maybe there is some coal as well to account for the light that makes the diamonds sparkle.
    Brilliant! Thank you for providing that link. This is conclusive scientific proof that diamonds can be formed in space. There is no room for doubt here. The evidence just keeps mounting in favor of the Diamond Star Theory. Also, the report mentioned that these space diamonds were much more harder (and thereby more denser) than earth diamonds. Since this is the case, that means light travels slower through space diamonds (stars), which makes the preceeding figures I cited of 77,000 miles per second too fast.

    So if light is traveling slower, that must mean the stars are closer than my previous calculations! It now appears to be that six billion miles away is too far. See, this is what science is about. It is about changing conclusions and theories to accomodate new evidence.

    Also on that site, I found a page which shows evidence that diamonds and diamond oceans exist on Uranus! We are at the forefront of new scientific breakthroughs which correspond perfectly with the literal Genesis version of creation in the King James Bible.

    Leave a comment:


  • A Follower
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    You are correct, stars indeed consist of diamond, but not just any diamond, star diamond is even harder than regular diamond. See this news article from 2 days ago:

    Researchers using a diamond paste to polish a slice of a fallen star stumbled onto something remarkable: crystals in the rock that are harder than diamonds.

    A closer look with an array of instruments revealed two totally new kinds of God-designed carbon, which are harder than the diamonds formed inside the Earth.
    [...]
    The researchers were polishing a slice of the carbon-rich Havero star that God hurled down to Earth in Finland in 1971. When they then studied the polished surface they discovered carbon-loaded spots that were raised well above the rest of the surface –- suggesting that these areas were harder than the diamonds used in the polishing paste.


    The researchers do keep mentioning carbon though, so maybe there is some coal as well to account for the light that makes the diamonds sparkle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev Jeffrey Lebowski
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Bro. Rev. Osborne:
    Thanks be to you for finally, and definitively, proving what stars is made of !!
    Sister Verna is singing this LBC 'revised' song:

    Twinkle, twinkle, little star,
    How I no longer wonder what you are!
    Up above the world so high,
    Like a diamond in the sky!

    When the blazing sun is gone,
    When the nothing shines upon,
    Then you show your little light,
    Twinkle, twinkle, all the night.

    Then the traveler in the dark,
    Thanks you for your tiny spark,
    He could not see which way to go,
    If you did not twinkle so.

    In the dark blue sky you keep,
    And often through my curtains peep,
    For you never shut your eye,
    Till the sun is in the sky.

    As your bright and tiny spark,
    Lights the traveler in the dark,—
    Though I know not now what you are,
    Twinkle, twinkle, little star.

    Praise be LBC Creation Sciencetist

    Rev Jeffrey Lebowski
    Sister Verna Too {she made me see stars when she hit me in the head with a coke bottle}

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Are Stars Actually Giant Diamonds? Science and Math Confirms

    Powerful Christian science teaching Revered Osborn. Coal in the sky would make sense, explaining the very blackness of space itself. Clearly God wisely chose the black coal to offer a strong contrast to the white diamonds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rev. Jim Osborne
    replied
    Re: The Sun: Millions of miles away?

    Thank you for your support. It's nice to know that reasonable, rational men like you Brothers Bobby-Joe and James are willing to take an objective look at the facts.

    I just had a stunning realization earlier today when I took my SL65 down to the car wash. As I was sitting in the lounge, watching the Mexicans soap down my car, I happened to notice a sign on display regarding carbon emissions from cars. Carbon! The epiphany struck me.

    Since we know the sun is essentially a large lump of coal (carbon), this piles on more evidence of the stars actually made up of diamonds (carbon). Coal and diamonds are one in the same thing! This also proves that there is specific, intelligent design in the Heavens and more evidence of God's existence.

    This led me to the conclusion that the moon is most likely made out of a variety of carbon. But what kind? My research yielded in answer! In 1969, scientists discovered "White Carbon". This would explain why the moon is white. Furthermore, white carbon has the property of splitting a beam of light into two beams. This would explain why the moon has phases. Then a moon is half-full, white light and black light are in equal properties. When it is full, the white light is dominant and when it is a new moon, the black light is dominant.

    The scientific facts keep adding up into the favor of diamond stars and a coal sun.

    Large molecules consisting only of carbon, known as buckminsterfullerenes, or buckyballs, have recently been discovered and are currently the subject of much scientific interest. A single buckyball consists of 60 or 70 carbon atoms (C60 or C70) linked together in a structure that looks like a soccer ball. They can trap other atoms within their framework, appear to be capable of withstanding great pressures and have magnetic and superconductive properties.
    The stars, sun, and moon could be gigantic buckyballs, hence their round shape. They also have magnetic and superconductive properties which allow them to transmit a great deal of light.

    Carbon-14, a radioactive isotope of carbon with a half-life of 5,730 years, is used to find the age of formerly living things through a process known as radiocarbon dating.
    This is more evidence against an old universe. Since carbon has such a short half-life, how could the stars, sun, and moon have been around for millions, if not billions of years? It's impossible! Again, we can use mathematics to prove the age of the celestial objects and when they will die.

    The half life of 5,730 years is times by 2 to create the full life. This is 11,460 years. The stars, sun, and moon can be no older than 11,460 years old according to the math. And since we know the universe was created in 4004 B.C., we know when they were actually created.

    This means the stars, sun, and moon will be gone no later than the year 7456 A.D. Of course, we expect the rapture to occur very, very soon so this is probably a moot point.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X