[Meek and Humble]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

For the first I’m from Finland, your admins just thought it would be fun to mess up my profile and change my name.
Also this is the same thing that you posted previously and it doesn’t really explain how we are pulled to the ground, only why we can't fly over supposed "edge" of the world

Look you dumb Finn, JESUS pulls us to the ground!

Colossians 1:17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

[wait_what]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

So, the long and the short of it is this.

The Earth is Flat.

God lets us go where He wants us to go.

He keeps us where we need to be.

Anything contradictory is a propaganda based lie.

Good day.

[Finland FTW]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

Yes. So even if the wild theory of gravity actually were reality, it would work just fine on flat earth.

No it would not, how did you even get to that conclusion!?!

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

No it would not, how did you even get to that conclusion!?!

You said it yourself. Shape is not a factor in theory of gravity. Not even with that soda can.

[Finland FTW]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

You said it yourself. Shape is not a factor in theory of gravity. Not even with that soda can.

No, you misunderstood me. The can has a weak gravity field and can't bend itself. But if you put the little stone next to it (in vacuum) it would be pulled towards the center so if this I I is the soda can the stone would be pulled so it was I . I there where it’s much closer to the centre then .I I there or I I. So when the earth was created the matter would always be pulled to the spot that’s as close to the middle as possible and therefore creating a sphere shaped earth.

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

No, you misunderstood me. The can has a weak gravity field and can't bend itself. But if you put the little stone next to it (in vacuum) it would be pulled towards the center so if this I I is the soda can the stone would be pulled so it was I . I there where it’s much closer to the centre then .I I there or I I. So when the earth was created the matter would always be pulled to the spot that’s as close to the middle as possible and therefore creating a sphere shaped earth.

But what I I. can pulled gravity I. I field where it's earth I I. (closer) ?

Jack

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

No, you misunderstood me. The can has a weak gravity field and can't bend itself. But if you put the little stone next to it (in vacuum) it would be pulled towards the center so if this I I is the soda can the stone would be pulled so it was I . I there where it’s much closer to the centre then .I I there or I I. So when the earth was created the matter would always be pulled to the spot that’s as close to the middle as possible and therefore creating a sphere shaped earth.

Prove it. Use any theory of gravity math you like. Still, in theory of gravity, it is about mass. Not about shape. You are again saying only that stronger field overpowers weaker. Nothing to do with shape. So tell me then, what is this mass when matter curls up in a ball like a cat. How much weight would it need? Then tell me, where in theory of gravity is it said spheric shape is needed.

If flat earth would have high enough mass, theory of gravity would work just fine and there is lot of stuff in this earth we live in. Pilars of earth, ocean below, earth it self, hell and who knows what. That's a lot of stuff.

That is of course pure speculation. Whole theory is so silly.

[zoonswoggle]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

Even if the theory of gravity is wrong and intelligent pushing/pulling is correct, gravity might still be useful. For example, even if the grand principle behind the theory is wrong, we can still use it for relatively correct predictions. The major drawback with intelligent pushing is that it doesn't allow you to predict things such as motion, velocity, or other measurable things. If we say that the motion of things depend on how God moves them, then how can we predict the motion of falling objects when the reasoning of God is so far beyond us? With gravity at least, we can make practical use of it.

Here's an example...
If I drop a rock from 10 feet off the ground, then how long will it take for it to hit ground?

We all agree that God is moving the rock, but knowing what's moving tells us nothing about the motion of what is being moves.

Creationist answer: unknowable
Scientific answer: 0.78 seconds

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

Even if the theory of gravity is wrong and intelligent pushing/pulling is correct, gravity might still be useful. For example, even if the grand principle behind the theory is wrong, we can still use it for relatively correct predictions. The major drawback with intelligent pushing is that it doesn't allow you to predict things such as motion, velocity, or other measurable things. If we say that the motion of things depend on how God moves them, then how can we predict the motion of falling objects when the reasoning of God is so far beyond us? With gravity at least, we can make practical use of it.

Nonsense. True Christian™ Science has a very exact model of the effects of intelligent pulling and pushing.

Creationist answer: unknowable
Scientific answer: 0.78 seconds

Nonsense again!

Every idiot knows that the formula for intelligent pulling is: .

So in your example:

So the True Christian™ scientific answer is 0.7886956423909863 seconds. Clearly way more accurate than your nonsensical scientific answer that isn't even rounded properly.

[zoonswoggle]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

Where does that formula come from?

[zoonswoggle]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

And by the way, that's the same formula I used, except I derived it from applied physics . Also, the reason the answer I gave wasn't as accurate as yours is because I did a quite calculation in my head while you did the same on a calculator.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

And by the way, that's the same formula I used, except I derived it from applied physics . Also, the reason the answer I gave wasn't as accurate as yours is because I did a quite calculation in my head while you did the same on a calculator.

Your head is flawed. You should stop using it.

[wait_what]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

And by the way, that's the same formula I used, except I derived it from applied physics . Also, the reason the answer I gave wasn't as accurate as yours is because I did a quite calculation in my head while you did the same on a calculator.

You derived the formula for secular gravity? All this time I thought it was Newton.

While witnessing your testimony, I recommend accuracy. Relying on your obviously flawed head is going to be the wrong approach.

[Lanfeust]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

Is g by the way not 9.81? Instead of 9.8?

[zoonswoggle]

Re: Scientific proof the Earth is flat!

As for my "flawed head," I don't think you could have done better yourself. I only did a quick calculation to show that physics yields answers while the Bible doesn't. You have yet to show me where you got that formula.