Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

[Meek and Humble]

Some evolutionists are saying the fact that the red squirrel is dying out and being replaced by the grey squirrel due to disease is a form of "natural selection."

The red squirrel is dying because the grey is spreading a disease. This is what happens when things mix. This has nothing to do with 'natural selection'.

The Bible says God created everything within a specific boundary and designated it an area. The greys are not native and have broken out of their indigeous habitat and are killing off the red squirrels.

If you think otherwise, I don't think you understand the term 'natural selection'.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

I've heard it said that the red squirrels just taste better too. That might have something to do with it.

[clownbaby]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

lol, refudiated.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

lol, refudiated.

You clearly misunderestimate the changing nature of the English language!

[Ksevio]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

Ha probably becuase hunters' selection of nature finds the red ones make better clothing

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

No, the answer is simple. God's Wrath, as explained in the Theory Punctuated Smiting. The red squirrels are clearly a bunch of degenerates into butt sex so God is killing them off one by one, slowly in horrible ways.The increase in gray (as in not gay) squirrels is just The Good Lord's angels creating replacements for the red squirrels who have been destroyed by God.

[Unfalsifiable]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

I always thought it was quite obvious - the flamboyant Red Squirrels are raving homosexuals and are being punished by God just like that damnable queer "Yangze River Pink Dolphin".

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

Ha probably becuase hunters' selection of nature finds the red ones make better clothing

Only evolutionists believe disease is an environmental factor. The root of disease in the Bible is sin or faulty thinking or doing. Again this is the case where we have polar opposite beliefs on an issue.

[Jeff_Celler]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

Only evolutionists believe disease is an environmental factor. The root of disease in the Bible is sin or faulty thinking or doing. Again this is the case where we have polar opposite beliefs on an issue.

Well even you people get the flu or a cold. So that means you guy's are sinners and have faulty thinking to if you think that is true.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

Well even you people get the flu or a cold. So that means you guy's are sinners and have faulty thinking to if you think that is true.

So according to you, if one population spreads a disease to another, that is 'natural selection'?

I don't know if this is serious?

[Jeff_Celler]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

The natural selection in that would be that those who are to weak to survive the disease dies out and only the ones strong enough to survive it will be able to reproduce.
Two parents with a strong immune system would have a child with a strong immune system. Basic genetics.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

The natural selection in that would be that those who are to weak to survive the disease dies out and only the ones strong enough to survive it will be able to reproduce.
Two parents with a strong immune system would have a child with a strong immune system. Basic genetics.

No it isn't.

There is no 'selection'. The disease is a result of the two different squirrels mixing, in nature this is not natural, most animals stick to their own habitats.

You believe if things spread disease, that is evidence for 'natural selection', i find it hard to take this claim seriously as will most who read your posts.

[Jeff_Celler]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

Well I think its hard to believe "god" says. you don't follow my commands so you get sick.

Besides you don't get natural selection, its simple though, the strong survive and can reproduce. The weak can't and they die.

Also why wouldn't animals change habitats? A lot of animal species are generalists, meaning they can survive in quite a lot of habitats. Ravens for example. Or cockroaches those guy's can live in almost any habitat as long as there is food.

[Sheldon the Swede]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

No it isn't.

There is no 'selection'. The disease is a result of the two different squirrels mixing, in nature this is not natural, most animals stick to their own habitats.

You believe if things spread disease, that is evidence for 'natural selection', i find it hard to take this claim seriously as will most who read your posts.

Two different squirrels can't reproduce together, they need to have the same gentic match, not any animal can 'mix', as you say, together, Basic genetic.

Diseases come with overpoulation, if one sort of animal comes too much in a habitat, diseases will come (fact) and they will be more attacked by predators because of their great number, also here principles of evolution, adaptation of the fittest. Those who survive the disease live and those who are better at escaping, evolution and geteics.

[Lost Sheep McUinnean]

Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED

Well I think its hard to believe "god" says. you don't follow my commands so you get sick.

Besides you don't get natural selection, its simple though, the strong survive and can reproduce. The weak can't and they die.

Also why wouldn't animals change habitats? A lot of animal species are generalists, meaning they can survive in quite a lot of habitats. Ravens for example. Or cockroaches those guy's can live in almost any habitat as long as there is food.

Explain the disappearance of the Elephant Bird of Madagascar or the Moa when the Maoris arrived in Australia or the giant Ground Sloth, Sabre Toothed Tigers....and so on. HArdly pussies in the animal kingdom now , were they?

God 1
Darwin 0