[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

appearance of species just like that, it is a gradual change over time!

If God wanted to change things He could do it very quickly. Just look how he changes a little tadpole into a beautiful butterfly!

YiC

Jack

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Isaiah: I do not think you have any concept or have even looked into evolution properly without your narrow minded vision! Why can reptiles not evolve? - you make no sense! - explain how DNA can vary among population and yet share common ancestry? - thus often forming new species.

Evolution can't be true simply because GOD HIMSELF says so in the Bible.

Genesis 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

It takes millions of years for species to form and adapt to an environment often via separation

Except that the Earth isn't "millions and millions of years old" and that is yet another PROOF that the theory of evolution is a lie.

You have not provided any proof by linking me to that page? - where does it mention a pouch? If muscle isn't preserved you can be damn sure skin won't be!

If you want to know more about the Kangarosaurus Rex, click HERE!

Now seen as you avoid all skeletal questions as it is clear you can't get around the fact that they are significantly different ... could you answer why dentition in T rex's are shaped and arranged as such please?

The skeletal structures of the two are completely identical except for the size. You might want to have your eyes checked if you fail to see that.

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Isaiah: I do not think you have any concept or have even looked into evolution properly without your narrow minded vision! Why can reptiles not evolve? - you make no sense! - explain how DNA can vary among population and yet share common ancestry? - thus often forming new species. It takes millions of years for species to form and adapt to an environment often via separation!

You have not provided any proof by linking me to that page? - where does it mention a pouch? If muscle isn't preserved you can be damn sure skin won't be!

Now seen as you avoid all skeletal questions as it is clear you can't get around the fact that they are significantly different ... could you answer why dentition in T rex's are shaped and arranged as such please?

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

So your [sic] telling me that God pulled out a big pen and started writing?

If you dictate a letter to your secretary and she puts it down word for word, who gets credit for writing that letter?

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Sorry, my mistake - I misunderstood your question. So your telling me that God pulled out a big pen and started writing?? - Yes some may have been spoken to God but not all! What was to stop someone like me when it was wrote adding a chapter to it and saying God told me to write this?

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

How do you explain DNA that supports evolutionary theories?

DNA does not support evolution. Actually, it effectively prevents the changing of one species into another. For example, because of their DNA reptiles can't possibly "evolve" into marsupials, not even over a period of "millions and millions of years". Therefore, DNA successfully exposes the evolution lie.

And in response to an earlier question: evolution is not an appearance of species just like that, it is a gradual change over time!

If a frog turns into a handsome prince quickly it's called a "fairy tale" but if a frog turns into handsome prince slowly it's called "modern science". Don't you see a huge gap in logic there?

P.s. You mentioned earlier on that they had pouches ... where is your proof for this?

That proof has already been provided HERE.

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Fossil evidence. Now where is yours? and could you answer the remaining questions please

[Wide-Open]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

No I cannot support this idiocy with scripture as humans wrote the bible not God - why can't you see this???

To use your own words: where is your proof for this?

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

P.s. You mentioned earlier on that they had pouches ... where is your proof for this?

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

No I cannot support this idiocy with scripture as humans wrote the bible not God - why can't you see this???

The World is definitely much older than 6020years old ... surely you can see this and there is so much proof backing this up!

How do you explain DNA that supports evolutionary theories? And in response to an earlier question: evolution is not an appearance of species just like that, it is a gradual change over time! I still can't see how you can even comprehend that the T rex is similar in anyway to a kangaroo. Explain the teeth? Explain the feet and leg structure? - I think you need to go back to the drawing board and think of another group of animals to back this up!

[MisterM]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Except that its not!

You are right. It is 6020 years old.

Edit: You must understand that Dr. Jones only gave approximation. No need to nitpick him.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Except that its not!

Could you please support this unfounded statement with scripture?

[natureboyuk6]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

The Earth is around 6,000 years old

Except that its not!

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

It is not a snake. Nothing about it is similar to a snake!

Where is the proof that they had pouches if tissue etc. is not still here? There foot and leg structure would not allow for significant jumping nor would the size of the tail which would be needed for balance! Surely either way what your suggesting supports evolution? - loss of teeth, head structure etc.?

Why have we got an appendix if evolution isn't happening?

If Kangorasaurus did not jump how did it leave deep footprints in solid rock?? And don't tell me that it is 'fossilisation'

The Earth is around 6,000 years old, that would not be enough time for mud to 'magically' turn into rock. Surely even you must realise that?

YiC

Jack

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Surely either way what your suggesting supports evolution? - loss of teeth, head structure etc.?

You clearly have not read my research. Evolution is when one animal magically transforms into another. Moreover, it is just a theory and has no real basis in Biblical research.

What my research actually supports is the Biblical FACT that due to a canopy of water being present in the stratosphere (Genesis 1:6-8) everything grew much larger than it does today (Genesis 6:4).

It also supports the FACT that dinosaurs did not become extinct, as that would mean Noah having to exclude them from the Ark.

Genesis 8:19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.

Instead, after God having released the waters from the firmament, they just shrunk due to all the changes in the atmosphere.