[Two-Dollar Bill]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

you are all retarded, and i just want you to know that. we could throw all the scientific proof at you we wanted and you still wouldnt believe it. you're a bunch of homophobic catholics. please, do the actual Christian world a favor, and go commit suicide so you can be taken to the asteroid that the aliens are on. Thanks! -Joe Mawmaw

That is insulting and proof that you are dumber than an injun in the big city.

I suggest you put down that pudding pop and:

1. get your facts straight
2. read the Bible
3. show some humility and understanding for people who may not share your views

[J3suslovesall]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

you are all retarded, and i just want you to know that. we could throw all the scientific proof at you we wanted and you still wouldnt believe it. you're a bunch of homophobic catholics. please, do the actual Christian world a favor, and go commit suicide so you can be taken to the asteroid that the aliens are on. Thanks! -Joe Mawmaw

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Alright, this is too much. I've just had the pleasure of one of my colleagues sending me a link to this thread, and I must admit, I've had quite the laugh. I don't even know where to start debunking all of you nutt-cases. First lets start off with the "Unicorn horn" hahaha

This so-called Unicorn horn, is nothing more than a tooth of a Narwhal, and since all you need on this website are pictures to prove your hypothesis. Allow me...
<SATANIC LINK REMOVED>
(and might I add, good for you for assisting in the slaughter of these majestic, endangered animals)

Whales don't have teeth like that. That's just silly. You can see by the structure of that horn that it clearly fits older descriptions of unicorn horns.

The unicorn is described variously as resembling a small goat, an ass, or a horse. It has a single horn in the middle of its head; the horn is usually depicted as straight and long, and often with a spiral groove running up it. The unicorn is fierce, strong and swift, and no hunter can catch it. To tame the beast so it can be captured, a virgin girl is placed in its path. The unicorn, seeing the maiden, comes to her and puts its head in her lap and falls asleep. The hunters can then easily capture or kill it. Some accounts say the girl must bare her breast and allow the unicorn to suckle. If the unicorn is captured, it is taken to the king's palace.

Next let's move onto to this "Kangaurosaurs" or whatever you are attempting to call it. I had to catch my breath when I first heard this, because I couldn't do anything but guffaw. The bone structure's of these animals (like Natureboy pointed out) are COMPLETELY different. You told him he needed to get his eyes checked... Well isn't that you in your display picture? Wearing two big-ass bifocals? God must love you so much, that he gave you awful eye vision right? Where do I start on the differences of the fossils, first lets start off with the feet. The feet of the Kangaroo are MUCH larger in proportion to it's body than the T-rex's are. As well, they Kangaroo leans on it's tail for stability and balance, thus its tail is very large in proportion to it's body. With the T-rex's tail however, the tip of it's tail barely touches the ground, meaning that it would not have provided the stability needed for a jumping locomotion. As well, the rib cage on the T-rex extends all the way down to it's pelvis, whereas the Kangaroo's ribcage only extends halfway down it's torso. What's more, the Kangaroo has 5 fingers, the T-rex has 2 functional fingers, and 1 residual finger... 1+2=3 not 5. The kangaroo also has 4 toes, whereas the T-rex only has 3.

I'm not sure where you bought your Ph.D. from, Mr. "Scientist" but I suggest that you ask for a refund.

1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
1 Timothy 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.

Whew, now if I was able to examine the skeletons in person, up close, I could probably pick out 1000s of other differences between them. As well, something that you've inadvertently done with this theory is use evolution to support your thesis. If an animal decreases it's size due to environmental pressures (such as more UV radiation and all that other bullshit you talk about, post flood, which never happened by the way) then it's evolving to cope with change. Unfortunately, the Kangaroo and Tyrannosaurus-Rex, are not related in any way, shape or form, other than the fact that they are a bipedal organism.

If you had actually bothered to read my research you would know that this has absolutely nothing to do with EVILution. As my research proves the T-Rex did not magically trnsform into a different animal, it only shrunk while retaining it original shape. If the T-Rex had transformed into a chicken then that would be a whole different matter.

Even though animals can grow smaller over time, they do not change their shapes as suggested by the lies of evolution.

Genesis 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

I must admit, I'm excited to hear the erroneous claims that you people will come up with to try and debunk, what I've debunked. Unfortunately, you cannot prove that god wrote the bible, in fact you cannot even prove that god exists (and when I say prove, I mean with conclusive proof beyond all REASONABLE doubt.) I, on the other hand can simply prove the many fallacies of the bible, such as the myth that there was a great flood, that covered the entire earth.

Then debunk these claims, please. In fact, the Bible proves that God wrote it. It says so in the Bible!

2 Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

IF there was a flood that covered the entire earth, you would expect the earth to be layered in segments of rock (which it is) HOWEVER, IF the earth was covered in a dense blanket of water, all of the heavier rocks would sink to the bottom, whereas the light debris would float to the top. Once it settled you would have an even distribution of rocks throughout the entire planet (you can test this law, by filling up a cup with dirt, then flooding it with water, shake it up and watch what happens.) Unfortunately for you people, this is not what we see with our eyes today, for example, salt flats are EXTREMELY heavy rock sediment, yet they exist at the surface of the planet.... HOW CAN THIS BE?! haha anyways, I don't think I need to go on any further, you all have a lot of work to do trying to prove me wrong here.

Scripture does not agree with your erroneous speculations.

Genesis 6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.

I will not reply to comments that use scripture as "proof" or anyone who references the bible at all for that matter. We're living in 2011, and our planet is going to shit, because of people like you, thinking this planet was given to us and that we can do as we like with it. You're all about to find out very soon, that nature doesn't care whether you read your bible, and pray every night before you go to bed.

Look, friend. This is NOT a debate forum. This is a Christian forum dedicated to praising the Lord and discussing His Word™. If you can not support your idiotic claims with scripture then your words mean nothing to us.

2 Timothy 4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

...debunking all of you nutt-cases....

You misspelled the word "nut." That's kind of surprising, as I'm sure you are no stranger to having nuts in your mouth.

The bone structure's of these animals...

The plural of "structure" is "structures." The word contains no apostrophe.

For somebody trying to pass himself off as a learned man, you sure have atrocious grammar. Add to this the fact that you freely admit to being Biblically illiterate, and I honestly can't think of any reason to talk to you.

However, if you do want to continue to engage any of us here, you should really go to the Introductory Forum and introduce yourself, as per the forum's very clearly stated rules.

[SecularBiologist.]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Alright, this is too much. I've just had the pleasure of one of my colleagues sending me a link to this thread, and I must admit, I've had quite the laugh. I don't even know where to start debunking all of you nutt-cases. First lets start off with the "Unicorn horn" hahaha

This so-called Unicorn horn, is nothing more than a tooth of a Narwhal, and since all you need on this website are pictures to prove your hypothesis. Allow me...

http://brainz.org/narwhals-jousting-superiority-over-seas/

(and might I add, good for you for assisting in the slaughter of these majestic, endangered animals)

Next let's move onto to this "Kangaurosaurs" or whatever you are attempting to call it. I had to catch my breath when I first heard this, because I couldn't do anything but guffaw. The bone structure's of these animals (like Natureboy pointed out) are COMPLETELY different. You told him he needed to get his eyes checked... Well isn't that you in your display picture? Wearing two big-ass bifocals? God must love you so much, that he gave you awful eye vision right? Where do I start on the differences of the fossils, first lets start off with the feet. The feet of the Kangaroo are MUCH larger in proportion to it's body than the T-rex's are. As well, they Kangaroo leans on it's tail for stability and balance, thus its tail is very large in proportion to it's body. With the T-rex's tail however, the tip of it's tail barely touches the ground, meaning that it would not have provided the stability needed for a jumping locomotion. As well, the rib cage on the T-rex extends all the way down to it's pelvis, whereas the Kangaroo's ribcage only extends halfway down it's torso. What's more, the Kangaroo has 5 fingers, the T-rex has 2 functional fingers, and 1 residual finger... 1+2=3 not 5. The kangaroo also has 4 toes, whereas the T-rex only has 3.

Whew, now if I was able to examine the skeletons in person, up close, I could probably pick out 1000s of other differences between them. As well, something that you've inadvertently done with this theory is use evolution to support your thesis. If an animal decreases it's size due to environmental pressures (such as more UV radiation and all that other bullshit you talk about, post flood, which never happened by the way) then it's evolving to cope with change. Unfortunately, the Kangaroo and Tyrannosaurus-Rex, are not related in any way, shape or form, other than the fact that they are a bipedal organism.

I must admit, I'm excited to hear the erroneous claims that you people will come up with to try and debunk, what I've debunked. Unfortunately, you cannot prove that god wrote the bible, in fact you cannot even prove that god exists (and when I say prove, I mean with conclusive proof beyond all REASONABLE doubt.) I, on the other hand can simply prove the many fallacies of the bible, such as the myth that there was a great flood, that covered the entire earth.

IF there was a flood that covered the entire earth, you would expect the earth to be layered in segments of rock (which it is) HOWEVER, IF the earth was covered in a dense blanket of water, all of the heavier rocks would sink to the bottom, whereas the light debris would float to the top. Once it settled you would have an even distribution of rocks throughout the entire planet (you can test this law, by filling up a cup with dirt, then flooding it with water, shake it up and watch what happens.) Unfortunately for you people, this is not what we see with our eyes today, for example, salt flats are EXTREMELY heavy rock sediment, yet they exist at the surface of the planet.... HOW CAN THIS BE?! haha anyways, I don't think I need to go on any further, you all have a lot of work to do trying to prove me wrong here.

I will not reply to comments that use scripture as "proof" or anyone who references the bible at all for that matter. We're living in 2011, and our planet is going to shit, because of people like you, thinking this planet was given to us and that we can do as we like with it. You're all about to find out very soon, that nature doesn't care whether you read your bible, and pray every night before you go to bed.

Good day, ignoramuses. You've just been crucified.

[Jesus is Lord]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Thank you for posting this. I learn so much here. Does anyone know when the giant kangaroo angered God so much that he smote them? Or did God just shrink the giant kangaroo?

If you would actually read this thread you would find that your question has already been answered.

[its_faith]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Thank you for posting this. I learn so much here. Does anyone know when the giant kangaroo angered God so much that he smote them? Or did God just shrink the giant kangaroo?

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Whatever i was tring to be civil. Have fun with your flat earth and your giant kangaroos. And when the sky opens up and god is a flesh and blood race of advanced beings we'll see who's laughing.

You can laugh all you like, but know that Jesus and I will be having the last laugh as we watch you roast in hell for all eternity.

Psalm 2:1 Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
Psalm 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
Psalm 2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
Psalm 2:4 He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision.

Psalm 37:12 The wicked plotteth against the just, and gnasheth upon him with his teeth.
Psalm 37:13 The LORD shall laugh at him: for he seeth that his day is coming.

Psalm 58:10 The righteous shall rejoice when he seeth the vengeance: he shall wash his feet in the blood of the wicked.

Psalm 59:8 But thou, O LORD, shalt laugh at them; thou shalt have all the heathen in derision.

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Whatever i was tring to be civil. Have fun with your flat earth and your giant kangaroos. And when the sky opens up and god is a flesh and blood race of advanced beings we'll see who's laughing.

[Dr. Isaiah Jones]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

I mean there is truth in all of the ancient cultures..

I'll tell you the truth about all these ancient non-Christian cultures: They're roasting in hell.

Psalm 9:17 The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

What you're asking, essentially, is do we trust that God was telling us the truth when He wrote the Bible, or do we choose to call God a liar and go looking for a second opinion from some other book authored by some mortal who was tripping on peyote or channeling demonic entities?


I trust God, and so should you.

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

When i said that i meant what makes the bible the only story. I mean there is truth in all of the ancient cultures. The bible as well as all the other ancient scriptures of different cultures are a record of what those people encountered interpreted how they could.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

But i also believe in all the other religions and mythologies...

Ah yes, the non-commital, New Age hippie song and dance about all religions being equally valid because they all seek to express the same truth in different ways!

That's wonderful, my friend. Since you stated that you believe in all of them, albeit not fully, I must assume you're telling us that every religion has something wonderful to offer that is of such great value that it balances out whatever harm the false aspects of that religion might have.

Splendid.

Will you please, therefore, tell us exactly which features of the following religions are wonderful and good and believed in by you?

Aum Shinrikyo

The Moonies

Esoteric Hitlerism

Tantric Shaivism, whose practitioners are known to abduct and ritually gang rape women

Dianetics

NAMBLA


Go on, please, tell us exactly what it is that makes each of those religions special and wonderful. Go on, take your time; I'll wait.

[MisterM]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

You i'm sure are a great man with a lot of wisdom. believe it or not i believe everything in the bible happened....to an extent. But i also believe in all the other religions and mythologies to an extent.

So basically you believe in bits you like and don't actually even believe?

You either believe in Bible, as all of it, or you don't. There isn't any gray colors (or grey colours for non americans) here. Just black and white, true or wrong.

[Soldier4God]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

that is a possibility but not likely. Dr. Jones, I do have to apologize for my constant debating. You i'm sure are a great man with a lot of wisdom. believe it or not i believe everything in the bible happened....to an extent. But i also believe in all the other religions and mythologies to an extent. So i probably won't be debating as radical as i have been in the past few days. Best of luck in life and may god be with you.