It would be interesting to know, if god changed the design because they didn't taste good.
That is not the case. The point of this whole article was that God, in fact, didn't really change the design. Everything just shrunk due to different conditions and circumstances after the flood.
But the reason, why they don't exist anymore is easy... who want's a giant kangaroo on a wooden ship? - That might be the reason, why all dinosaur died.
As I already mentioned in the opening post this research proves that the dinosaurs didn't become extinct. They only became smaller due to lower oxygen levels, ultraviolet radiation, etc.
A bigger ship would have solved the problem.
The scriptures tell us that all land animals were placed on Noah's ark, including the dinosaurs. Remember, it must have been one heck of a man building that ship.
Genesis 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days;
Genesis 7:8-9 Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowls, and of every thing that creepeth upon the earth, There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female, as God had commanded Noah.
But how did it happen, that people today are smaller? - Was also the man recreated? - Human 2.0???
That's simply retarded. Now stop reading science-fiction and open your Holy Bible, young lady.
Nice work! - The pre-flood science is a new topic for me and I am very interested.
Do you think that we will find some of those pre-humans, like we found the kangaroo? And was the kangaroo also found in australia, like the newer created smaller ones?
It would be interesting to know, if god changed the design because they didn't taste good.
But the reason, why they don't exist anymore is easy... who want's a giant kangaroo on a wooden ship? - That might be the reason, why all dinosaur died. A bigger ship would have solved the problem.
But how did it happen, that people today are smaller? - Was also the man recreated? - Human 2.0???
Thank you for correcting me. Anyway, Your study seems to be the final stone to knock evolutionists down. And those evil devil worshipers should be stoned!
I am very sorry if I insulted You. I was having holy fury burning (it also could have been chili I ate last night) inside me because of the Moomins discussion and I didn't notice that You are a woman.
What I did was done in haste and was very unchristian and I apologize.
Now, let's stay on topic here. This thread is about my research on pre-flood kangaroos, not the moomins or dumb female posters.
You should think before you post, my unsaved friend. Jesus is watching every step you take.
Originally posted by María Gálvez-VillalobosView Post
Excuse me? Why are you insult me? I'm no slow, ?'m a young woman
I am very sorry if I insulted You. I was having holy fury burning (it also could have been chili I ate last night) inside me because of the Moomins discussion and I didn't notice that You are a woman.
What I did was done in haste and was very unchristian and I apologize.
Are you a woman or otherwise little slow? Of course the plants where also bigger and the kangaroos had to have tools to chew them.
Excuse me? Why are you insult me? I'm no slow, ?'m a young woman and I'm very intelligent enought for get a university career behind me in the Universidad de Alicante thank you. My english aren't very good but I'm learn better at the moment. Your own english is no so perfect I think but I wouldn't insulting you for this.
Please show better manners thank you.
And kangaroos don't used tools from what nobody knows, not now or in the past, if they use tools they wouldn't be kangaroos now, aren't they?
And True Disciple answer already my question. Or don't you saw that?
Hmm, it would have been grand sport to hunt those things. They are like at least 4 moose in one. I think I would have needed bigger gun though.
Originally posted by María Gálvez-VillalobosView Post
And looks that thing like tasty big chicking for eat and to food a entire family for weeks!
I like big meat too, me and my sisters too, we all love eat meat so a big meat like that would be so much better for the fiestas here!
Packing that large meat you could surely hold Fiesta for whole group. I like to eat spanish. Too bad we don't have that kind of Fiesta/BBQ culture here up north. Everyboby is just moping in the snow.
Well, I don't know about the colors, and of course, these are claims of secular evilutionists, so they should be regarded with apprehension. However, feathers on this beast would greatly improve the comfort of a possible journey, which is an argument for Intelligent Design. And when evilutionists come up with evidence that supports Intelligent Design, it is usually true.
Well, Sister, you must realize that, before the flood, all animals were herbivores. After all, it is only after the flood that God commands humans to eat meat:
Genesis 9:3: Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Here God says that He gave us meat to eat in addition to green herb He already gave us to eat, meaning that the eating of meat is something postdiluvian. After all, God originally gives animals and humans only plants to eat: Genesis 1:29-30: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
I hope I've cleared things up for you now, Sister!
Yes thank you sir brother, that was very elucidate for this matter.
And looks that thing like tasty big chicking for eat and to food a entire family for weeks!
I like big meat too, me and my sisters too, we all love eat meat so a big meat like that would be so much better for the fiestas here!
Originally posted by María Gálvez-VillalobosView Post
¡Jajajaja! Is looks sily this! Is like a gigantesc chicking this!
Sorry, but is real that??
Well, I don't know about the colors, and of course, these are claims of secular evilutionists, so they should be regarded with apprehension. However, feathers on this beast would greatly improve the comfort of a possible journey, which is an argument for Intelligent Design. And when evilutionists come up with evidence that supports Intelligent Design, it is usually true.
Also, one more problem I can to see is whit the teeths of the Kangasaurio Rex - are differents of the normal Austrian kangaroo ¿yes?
They are for eat the meats but the normal kangarú today is a vegetablevore, ¿yes?
How is explain this difference?
Sorry my ignorants questions, but I hope somoeone could clear this up me.
YIC, Mari.
Well, Sister, you must realize that, before the flood, all animals were herbivores. After all, it is only after the flood that God commands humans to eat meat:
Genesis 9:3: Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.
Here God says that He gave us meat to eat in addition to green herb He already gave us to eat, meaning that the eating of meat is something postdiluvian. After all, God originally gives animals and humans only plants to eat: Genesis 1:29-30: And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
I hope I've cleared things up for you now, Sister!
About the idea of antediluvian people traveling around in the pouches of kangaroos, I think that it is feasible. After all, secular scientists have found that Kangarosaurus Rex probably had feathers:
This is more irrefutable proof that these creatures were Intelligently Designed by God to carry around humans, as these feathers would make the pouch like a soft and comfortable bed for long journeys.
WOW!
Is that a Transvestasaurus Mex or a Queeradactyl!?!?
About the idea of antediluvian people traveling around in the pouches of kangaroos, I think that it is feasible. After all, secular scientists have found that Kangarosaurus Rex probably had feathers:
This is more irrefutable proof that these creatures were Intelligently Designed by God to carry around humans, as these feathers would make the pouch like a soft and comfortable bed for long journeys.
¡Jajajaja! Is looks sily this! Is like a gigantesc chicking this!
Sorry, but is real that??
Also, one more problem I can to see is whit the teeths of the Kangasaurio Rex - are differents of the normal Austrian kangaroo ¿yes?
They are for eat the meats but the normal kangarú today is a vegetablevore, ¿yes?
How is explain this difference?
Sorry my ignorants questions, but I hope somoeone could clear this up me.
About the idea of antediluvian people traveling around in the pouches of kangaroos, I think that it is feasible. After all, secular scientists have found that Kangarosaurus Rex probably had feathers:
This is more irrefutable proof that these creatures were Intelligently Designed by God to carry around humans, as these feathers would make the pouch like a soft and comfortable bed for long journeys.
Leave a comment: