X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • see_the_light
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    Amen, thats what I'm trying to get at here. They say that they follow the bible, and yet they have so much hate. The bible, does it not teach to love all living things as though they were your family? All men are created equal, that kind of thing?
    I see the good points of all religions, I accept their ideals, and learn their morals. Aparently as soon as southern baptists learn that a religion is not theirs, they hate them and come up with a racial slur for them.

    No, the Bible (at least not the one and only KJV) does not say to love "all living things"

    You love GOD, JESUS CHRIST OUR SAVIOUR and you have appropriate fear of his wrath (or did you think that the expression "GOD fearing man" to discribe a TRUE CHRISTIAN is some kind of joke?

    You hate Satan, You hate all that can lead you astray, you love what you should love, fear what you must and hate what leads you away from salavtion.

    Is that difficult to understand?

    PRAISE THE LORD

    p.s.no we do not have racial slurs for all false religions, just for a few did we find the time to come up with a simple and kind nickname that replaces the horrid description we should write otherwise

    Leave a comment:


  • IbelieveIknowwhat?
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by Father Thomas Martin View Post
    That would be more valid if you actually believed Jesus loves all the children.
    Amen, thats what I'm trying to get at here. They say that they follow the bible, and yet they have so much hate. The bible, does it not teach to love all living things as though they were your family? All men are created equal, that kind of thing?
    I see the good points of all religions, I accept their ideals, and learn their morals. Aparently as soon as southern baptists learn that a religion is not theirs, they hate them and come up with a racial slur for them.

    Leave a comment:


  • IbelieveIknowwhat?
    replied
    Re: KJV

    [quote=Brother V;114497]He does. How much love does it take for a parent to spank their child (if you don't value spanking, then say, putting them into a timeout). Imagine how much more love it takes to send someone to hell for all eternity.

    No human parent has that much love.

    YIC
    Thats about as far from love as it gets, that's hate......
    Sending some one to hell is loving them, few i cant imagine what'd you do if you really did hate me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wide-Open
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    and learn to spell endeavor.
    Better tell Captain James Cook and the guys that run NASA too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    But only people who call them yellow are you people.
    to the rest of the world, yellow means being a chicken, scared you know.
    NOT LITERALLY A CHICKEN
    So are you saying that all these images come from us? The rest of the world had nothing to do with any of them?
    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post


    The association of Yellow and China in this book must also just be a coincidence:
    No racial implications here, no sirree:

    Are you ready to apologise yet
    ?
    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    "Originally Posted by wiki
    The first major scientific model was created in 18th century when Carolus Linnaeus recognized four main races: Europeanus which he labeled the white race, Asiatic, which he labeled the yellow race, Americanus, which he labeled the red race, and Africanus, which he labeled the black race."

    Remember that you don't believe in science. That has no play in your decision.
    We don't make our decisions based on science, but you were claiming that we were the only people who referred to Asiatics as yellow, and that "the rest of the world" didn't. Are you claiming that Carolus Linnaeus was a member of Landover Baptist?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by Father Thomas Martin View Post
    That would be more valid if you actually believed Jesus loves all the children.
    He does. How much love does it take for a parent to spank their child (if you don't value spanking, then say, putting them into a timeout). Imagine how much more love it takes to send someone to hell for all eternity.

    No human parent has that much love.

    YIC
    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    "Originally Posted by wiki
    The first major scientific model was created in 18th century when Carolus Linnaeus recognized four main races: Europeanus which he labeled the white race, Asiatic, which he labeled the yellow race, Americanus, which he labeled the red race, and Africanus, which he labeled the black race."

    Remember that you don't believe in science. That has no play in your decision.
    It was put into words you might understand.

    Most people, when given information that they can use, say thank you.

    You, however, don't seem appreciative.

    V

    Leave a comment:


  • Father Thomas Martin
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by Brother V View Post
    Are you familiar with the song "Jesus loves the little children"?



    Yellow has been used to describe Asiatics for ages.

    Just as RED has been used to describe Native Americans.
    That would be more valid if you actually believed Jesus loves all the children.

    Leave a comment:


  • IbelieveIknowwhat?
    replied
    Re: KJV

    "Originally Posted by wiki
    The first major scientific model was created in 18th century when Carolus Linnaeus recognized four main races: Europeanus which he labeled the white race, Asiatic, which he labeled the yellow race, Americanus, which he labeled the red race, and Africanus, which he labeled the black race."

    Remember that you don't believe in science. That has no play in your decision.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother V
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    But only people who call them yellow are you people.
    to the rest of the world, yellow means being a chicken, scared you know.
    NOT LITERALLY A CHICKEN
    Are you familiar with the song "Jesus loves the little children"?

    Jesus loves the little children,
    All the children of the world.
    Red and yellow, black and white,
    All are precious in His sight,
    Jesus loves the little children of the world.
    Yellow has been used to describe Asiatics for ages.

    Just as RED has been used to describe Native Americans.

    Originally posted by wiki
    The first major scientific model was created in 18th century when Carolus Linnaeus recognized four main races: Europeanus which he labeled the white race, Asiatic, which he labeled the yellow race, Americanus, which he labeled the red race, and Africanus, which he labeled the black race.

    Leave a comment:


  • IbelieveIknowwhat?
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by Sister Talitha View Post
    So do you think we should call them Chickens? That's just silly.

    I suppose ChinK-ens would be close
    Ummmmmm....no......
    call them what they are, chinese. Chinc is extremely derogitory.
    How would you like it if I called you a wigger, or a cracker, or trailer trash......

    Leave a comment:


  • Talitha
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    But only people who call them yellow are you people.
    to the rest of the world, yellow means being a chicken, scared you know.
    NOT LITERALLY A CHICKEN
    So do you think we should call them Chickens? That's just silly.

    I suppose ChinK-ens would be close

    Leave a comment:


  • IbelieveIknowwhat?
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    No. I'm saying that people with pink and brown skin are referred to as white and black for the sake of convenience, because they belong to the races known as white and brown, just like we refer to heathen Chinamen who hate Jesus as being yellow.
    But only people who call them yellow are you people.
    to the rest of the world, yellow means being a chicken, scared you know.
    NOT LITERALLY A CHICKEN

    Leave a comment:


  • see_the_light
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    Mussolini?
    No, I believe he's talking about his father (his mother is still the archbishop of San Fancisco)

    (cat-a-licks... homer stuff... )

    MAY THE LORD HAVE MERCY ON THEIR SOULS!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: KJV

    Originally posted by IbelievewhatIknow? View Post
    so what you saying is that the race is called pink and brown, not white and black?
    No. I'm saying that people with pink and brown skin are referred to as white and black for the sake of convenience, because they belong to the races known as white and brown, just like we refer to heathen Chinamen who hate Jesus as being yellow.
    Originally posted by Father Thomas Martin View Post
    And we all know whose base is in Rome...Viva Il Papa!
    Mussolini?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X