Episcopalian bishops fight for lezbionic special privileges and against Jesus.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

The Catholics-lite in the Whiskypalian cult apparently don't think that marriage should be defended. Then again, given how the Anglercan't communion started, I guess that shouldn't be a big surprise.

Sodomite false Christian blog:

Bishops Petition Supreme Court for Marriage Equality

Twenty-nine bishops in the ten states (plus Washington DC) where same-sex marriage is legal signed an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court of the United States which challenges the constitutionality of the "Defense of Marriage Act" (DOMA), a 1996 law which mandates that the Federal government cannot recognize same-sex marriages. The leaders of all but one of the 24 dioceses where civil marriage is legal signed the brief addressing the case of Windsor v. United States, which is being heard by the Court this month.

The case refers specifically to an inheritance tax burden of over $360,000 owed by a New York woman after her wife died. The couple of 40 years was legally married in Canada in 2007, but DOMA stipulates that the inheritance benefits of marriage do not apply to even those same-sex marriages recognized by some states.

So just because some homeress wants a special privilege, the Whiskypalians spit on both the Bible and the law of the land.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: Episcopalian bishops fight for lezbionic special privileges and against Jesus.

So just because some homeress wants a special privilege, the Whiskypalians spit on both the Bible and the law of the land.

So true, Pastor Peters. Why didn't the homeress give her $350K to LBC and do some good? We could have used it to drag homers out of their misery and into the arms of Jesus.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: Episcopalian bishops fight for lezbionic special privileges and against Jesus.

Ridiculous! But the idea of taxing all homers, is no bad idea. As they are not bringing up children, as they add nothing to society, as they are literally "queer" and not normal at all, an extra taxation burden should fall on them. This extra income for the government can be used to increase the "trickle-down" effect by reducing taxation of the men of enterprise, e.g. people with incomes over $500,000.

We now have a list of all those who have entered into abominable relationships of unnatural fornication and they can now be singled out for executive action.