[Talitha]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

You can't revise NOTHING, without the original.

Double Negative.
Does not Compute.

No-one ever said God has to love sinners who hate Him. If He decides to kill people then It's for the greater good.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

But he didn't have a passport, and the reason he didn't have a passport was because he didn't live in modern times.

Such is the reason is said IF. Pay attention.

The Mayflower left in 1620, prior to 1620 there was nothing shameful about being English. Are you familiar with the idea that things in 2007 might be different to things in 1611?
The your fact states that ALL English, no matter what year, were homosexuals. This includes the time prior to 1611, and after 1611.

Umm, it doesn't?

Then why must the Holy Bible need to be revised into the King James bible?

Any more questions?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Well yeah, I mean God is perfect right? So why wasn't the Bible Perfect?

Umm, it is? How long are you going to keep on asking stupid questions? Why can you fly? Why is the moon purple?

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Umm, it is? How long are you going to keep on asking stupid questions? Why can you fly? Why is the moon purple?

It actually makes sence. Maybe you're not capable of understanding.

There is a version of the bible OLDER then the King James version, understand?

King James thought, "Let's revise it!"

And they did.

The point is!

If "God's" is perfect, the why did that original bible need to be revised?

I hope this clears things up.

[Talitha]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

King James thought, "Let's revise it!"

And they did.

I hadn't realised you were a personal friend of King James.

It's really weird how delusional Atheists can be

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

It actually makes sence. Maybe you're not capable of understanding.

There is a version of the bible OLDER then the King James version, understand?

King James thought, "Let's revise it!"

And they did.

The point is!

If "God's" is perfect, the why did that original bible need to be revised?

Because it wasn't His complete and perfect word. Duh.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Because it wasn't His complete and perfect word. Duh.

Therefore, the original bible is "God's" imperfect and incomplete word?

I thought of all people, "God" would make a perfect version of his word.

Maybe he's not all that perfect after all.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Therefore, the original bible is "God's" imperfect and incomplete word?

No, it is some humans making an imperfect attempt to reproduce God's word.

I thought of all people, "God" would make a perfect version of his word.

He did. The King James Version.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

No, it is some humans making an imperfect attempt to reproduce God's word.
Okay, then Humans wrote the Old Testimate, and the New Testimate, and Revelations? Then I guess we can also toss those out, because they're not "God's" word.

He did. The King James Version.
Which is based on the original bible, which we've proven to be unreliable as a representation of "God's" word.

^___^

This is fun.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Okay, then Humans wrote the Old Testimate, and the New Testimate, and Revelations? Then I guess we can also toss those out, because they're not "God's" word.

What's a Testimate?

Which is based on the original bible, which we've proven to be unreliable as a representation of "God's" word.

Once again, you're stating untruth as fact. The King James Bible is based on God dictating it.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Once again, you're stating untruth as fact. The King James Bible is based on God dictating it.

Why didn't "God" write it himself? Did he feel that dictating it to humans, who cound potentially mishear, or typo, or drop words, or any sort of problem, would be better then doing it himself?

Maybe he was lazy.

^___^

We all feel that way at times, ne?

[Brother Temperance]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Why didn't "God" write it himself? Did he feel that dictating it to humans, who cound potentially mishear, or typo, or drop words, or any sort of problem, would be better then doing it himself?

Because He doesn't feel the need to obey your empty-headed whims? God is God, He does what He likes.

[Shallow-izer (On Moderation)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Because He doesn't feel the need to obey your empty-headed whims? God is God, He does what He likes.

But I do raise a point about God's work ethic.

And so what if he's "God." He's a perfect being, it's not like he's going to get tired or anything.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

But I do raise a point about God's work ethic.

And so what if he's "God." He's a perfect being, it's not like he's going to get tired or anything.

God will not be mocked you empty-headed fool.

You have scales on your eyes and your father is satan therefore you cannot possibly understand God's Holy Word.

John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

[Joo (Quarantined)]

Re: THOSE HOMERISH ENGLISH

Umm, it is? How long are you going to keep on asking stupid questions? Why can you fly? Why is the moon purple?

Stupidity is Relative BT.

How long are you going to dodge them?

And btw, I can't fly, and the moon isn't purple. Oh wow...straight answers. I know they're foreign material to you guys, but just hold hands, you'll get used to it.

Oh and I see Zeke says that Satan had another child? I didn't know I had a brother...