Tweet
The issue of breast feeding has previously been raised on these Godly forums, and the main site has published an oustanding and informative article on the topic http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0...stfeeding.html.
One would think that women, particularly Landover women, would cease such wickedness. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Yesterday I was making my nightly rounds, randomly peeking through windows to make sure that nothing sinful was transpiring in my neighborhood, when I beheld a young lady--she will remain nameless on these boards, but the DOF has been informed--suckling her youngster with her left teat. I sternly rapped on her window with my pipe, and a look of horror swept over her face, no doubt because she had been caught "red breasted," as it were. Her shame was so great that she locked the front door and ran upstairs out of view.
Let's reiterate, ladies. Breast feeding is an abomination. Period. It is indecent and incestuous, and it makes Jesus sick. Some might argue that it is beautiful and natural. Did God not create mammary glands? Doesn't God want women to breast feed? The answer to the first question is "yes;" the answer to the second is a resounding "no." Nursing is only acceptable in the animal kingdom.
It is a test from the Almighty that many women unfortunately fail. Breast feeding is not only incestuous, it instills depravity in the baby. It is a fact that infant boys who are breast fed become sexually-charged beasts no better than the common Negro. It is a fact that infant girls who are breast fed crave cooter for the rest of their miserable lives, sporting manly haircuts and hanging out at lesbian music festivals.
Observe the following two pictures:
The first child has lust in its eyes. It is wanton and socially unfit. The second child is not tainted by incest. It is healthy, happy, and God-fearing. It goes without saying that Jesus Himself was bottle-fed. The choice is obvious, ladies. Leave your nipples in your brassieres where they belong.
One would think that women, particularly Landover women, would cease such wickedness. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Yesterday I was making my nightly rounds, randomly peeking through windows to make sure that nothing sinful was transpiring in my neighborhood, when I beheld a young lady--she will remain nameless on these boards, but the DOF has been informed--suckling her youngster with her left teat. I sternly rapped on her window with my pipe, and a look of horror swept over her face, no doubt because she had been caught "red breasted," as it were. Her shame was so great that she locked the front door and ran upstairs out of view.
Let's reiterate, ladies. Breast feeding is an abomination. Period. It is indecent and incestuous, and it makes Jesus sick. Some might argue that it is beautiful and natural. Did God not create mammary glands? Doesn't God want women to breast feed? The answer to the first question is "yes;" the answer to the second is a resounding "no." Nursing is only acceptable in the animal kingdom.
It is a test from the Almighty that many women unfortunately fail. Breast feeding is not only incestuous, it instills depravity in the baby. It is a fact that infant boys who are breast fed become sexually-charged beasts no better than the common Negro. It is a fact that infant girls who are breast fed crave cooter for the rest of their miserable lives, sporting manly haircuts and hanging out at lesbian music festivals.
Observe the following two pictures:
The first child has lust in its eyes. It is wanton and socially unfit. The second child is not tainted by incest. It is healthy, happy, and God-fearing. It goes without saying that Jesus Himself was bottle-fed. The choice is obvious, ladies. Leave your nipples in your brassieres where they belong.
Comment