FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

[Bobby-Joe]

Effective immediately and as per decision of the LandoverBaptist.net forum administers any further discussion of the Ann Coulter’s illegitimate child with Laura Ingraham will be deleted. All previous threads discussing this also have been closed and removed from the forum.

Frankly they have been nothing but vile slander against a respected political commentator by her enemies with no bases on fact. As far as we are concerned the matter is settled by the announcement made on Miss Coulte’rs website. As she explained this phenomena happens all the time with female rockfish so these unspeakable allegations about Miss Coulter’s gender are utterly unacceptable. We as Christian will not tolerate this kind of childish name calling and innuendo of depravity.

Thank you for you the forum user’s cooperation in this,
BJ Tabor
Landover Baptist Forum Administer

[JennyD]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

I thought Laura Ingraham was so bitter because she was barren.

So surely these rumors have no foundation in fact.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

I thought Laura Ingraham was so bitter because she was barren.

So surely these rumors have no foundation in fact.

One would pray so, though it has been noted Miss Ingraham's breast cancer would not prevent her from conceiving and she has issued no denial that she pregnant. If this is just a rumor it would be a typical cruel stunt from liberals to mock the right and I for one am disgusted.

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

I'd just like to add my voice to those of my fellow True Christians(TM) in saying that we simply should not be discussing these foul slanders. If Ann Coulter is going to bear any woman's child, it will be Phyllis Schlafly's.*

*Just kidding, Phyllis. We know you're that you're straight, and we love you for it, as does God, even if your refusal to stay in the home like a good wife and mother did directly result in your son's homosexuality. And Ann, your dedication to the chaste Christian life if beyond question.

[Underpants Gnome]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

Effective immediately and as per decision of the LandoverBaptist.net forum administers any further discussion of the Ann Coulter’s illegitimate child with Laura Ingraham will be deleted. All previous threads discussing this also have been closed and removed from the forum.

Frankly they have been nothing but vile slander against a respected political commentator by her enemies with no bases on fact. As far as we are concerned the matter is settled by the announcement made on Miss Coulte’rs website. As she explained this phenomena happens all the time with female rockfish so these unspeakable allegations about Miss Coulter’s gender are utterly unacceptable. We as Christian will not tolerate this kind of childish name calling and innuendo of depravity.

Thank you for you the forum user’s cooperation in this,
BJ Tabor
Landover Baptist Forum Administer

Hey, but, er didn't you just say Coulter impregnated this other woman. WTF? There’s only one way that can happen.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

Hey, but, er didn't you just say Coulter impregnated this other woman. WTF? There’s only one way that can happen.

Yes, as Mrs Coulter explained this happens with female rock fish all the time. You're skating on thin ice here UG.

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

Hey, but, er didn't you just say Coulter impregnated this other woman. WTF? There’s only one way that can happen.

Yuck! You must be talking about Dinesh D'Souza sloppy seconds. Not, mind you, that I believe those trashy rumors.

[Chezund Rice]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

Yes, as Mrs Coulter explained this happens with female rock fish all the time.

That's one of them cold water fish, ain't it? If they're anything like Carp, they're vicious & bony.

[Pinecone]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

With modern genetics it would be completely possible for a woman to impart her genetic offspring into another women. I could think of two ways, neither rather appealing in my personal opinion.

1. Direct cloning: Ann's genetic code could be copied and replicated into a fertilized egg which could then be placed inside Laura as a surogate mother.

2. This would probably be a bit more tricky, but I suppose it would be within the realm of possibility to combine the genetic material of Ann and Laura into a fertilized egg which could then be implanted. this would seem difficult as the zygotes in play would be more like trying to plug an electral outlet into another electral outlet (instead of the three prong that's supposed to go in there of course) but in theory it could happen.

Personally I prefer the good ol' fashioned way of procreating, but this sort of abomination is within the realm of current scientific possibility.

[I: Carumba]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

With modern genetics it would be completely possible for a woman to impart her genetic offspring into another women. I could think of two ways, neither rather appealing in my personal opinion.

1. Direct cloning: Ann's genetic code could be copied and replicated into a fertilized egg which could then be placed inside Laura as a surogate mother.

2. This would probably be a bit more tricky, but I suppose it would be within the realm of possibility to combine the genetic material of Ann and Laura into a fertilized egg which could then be implanted. this would seem difficult as the zygotes in play would be more like trying to plug an electral outlet into another electral outlet (instead of the three prong that's supposed to go in there of course) but in theory it could happen.

Personally I prefer the good ol' fashioned way of procreating, but this sort of abomination is within the realm of current scientific possibility.

Well, I think modern science -- as ungodly as it may be -- has a procedure for women called an "adadictamy" ...or something close to that.

[Mistress Cookie]

Re: FORUM ANNOUNCEMENT: Ban on Coulter child threads

Personally I prefer the good ol' fashioned way of procreating, but this sort of abomination is within the realm of current scientific possibility.

That may well be YOUR preference, Pinecone (and it IS a preference), but these two individuals are women, and I can't even count so high as to include the number I've known who would LEAP at the first...insemination device within reach if it would spare them the awkwardness of...the conventional manner.

We know this is only a rumor, though, as if it were true, one of our leading Republican commentators would be banned to hell, and that is clearly impossible.

1st Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Since they're both women, one of them has to take the...male role. But since that person is female, they would make a very effeminate man. And that is effeminacy.