who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

[Bjorn Jensen]

When it was revealed that Michael Vick practised dog fighting at his estate (along with electrocuting dogs, drowning puppies etc), he was torched and pitchforked by the liberal left wing media. At the same time, Jason Collins, a sodomite and pervert, gets celebrated as a hero worldwide. If you think in the terms of sensitive anal tissue and spreading the AIDS, Jason Collins is a much more violent person than Michael Vick.

But more importantly, here is what the Bible has to say about it:


Michael Vick did absolutely nothing wrong, and should not even have been punished

Genesis 1:26
And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.


Jason Collins however, has commited one of the most disgusting sins possible, and should be given the death penalty

Leviticus 20:13
If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

[ExGay Alex]

Re: who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

A little fun letting a dog be a dog and fight like a dog and the liberals freak out.

Condemning another fellow human being to an eternity in Hell for a sin that God never forgives (namely, bending him over and boning him again and again while he bites his knuckles in that sweet pain) is somehow considered "normal."

Truly gay sex is a cruel, evil deed, against the human condition in all ways, and harmful to everyone it touches. A little canine entertainment never hurt anybody.

I am not a fan of hockey or whatever sport it is these men play, but the dog fight one, what's his name, is far less evil than that other one, the sodomite one, Collings, or whatever.

[James Hutchins]

Re: who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

Sounds to me like you are worrying about nothing and next to nothing. They are both nigras and as such, not real people. But if I did have to chose, of course I'd pick Michael Vick.
Dogs, like nigras, are here to do work for Gods Favorite People(r). Sodomy is just plain wrong.

[Paragon of virtue]

Re: who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

A little fun letting a dog be a dog and fight like a dog and the liberals freak out.
.

And yet they praise the devilish murder simulator Pokemon...this shows how backwards our society has become.

[John Creeser]

Re: who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

Brother Hutchins is spot on.

I never did understand the fuss over Michael Vick - I mean big deal, they're dogs and according to the Bible we do as we please with animals (as Brother ex-viking pointed out in Genesis 1:26).

Being a sodomite is an abomination in the eyes of the Lord (Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:18-32). While I am sure there are a string of reasons Vick is going to hell, he did nothing biblically wrong (with letting dogs do what they do naturally) whereas Collins is spitting in the face of Baby Jesus!!

Collins is far worse, according to the Bible.

[Bjorn Jensen]

Re: who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

If Micahel Vick would convert to Christianity, dog fighting would not be one of the things he would have to repent for. When God created pit bulls, i am pretty sure fighting was what He had in mind, i mean, pit bull, as in pit fighting, can it get more obvious than that? Wouldn't it be cruel to own a pit bull and not let it do it's natural behaviour? Dog fighting is fun for the whole family, an all American sport that would be legal if it wasn't for demoncrats and commies like Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Re: who is worse? Jason Collins or Michael Vick?

If those dogs weren't given a proper outlet for their aggression, they would have taken it out on people. I have to assume that those who condemned Vick were making gravy to the thought of little children having their faces ripped off.