Donald Trump’s wife and Plagiarism

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

I can’t see what the fuss is about the alleged plagiarizing of Michelle Obama’s speech by the charming and delightful Melanoma Trump. I plagiarize the Bible daily, and nobody save a few irredeemable sinners have any objection, and they don't count.

Of course, I do it with the Word of God – everyone knows that, so if you ever listen to Michelle Obama, (but why would you?) you would know that too – so where’s the big deal?

Now I don’t listen to this sort of “celebrity gossip” myself – I’m a man – but women do it all the time and they pick up on little phrases and saying without the faintest idea of where they come from – and why should they know such things? I caught Mrs Bathfire the other day spouting a piece about how we should look favorably on eugenics but I never accused her of “plagiarism” even though most of it was taken word for word from Francis Dalton himself.

Is any teacher to be accused of “plagiarism” because they tell us what someone said, or set questions on “Who said what?”

Look – this is a woman’s matter! Men should not even be discussing it! If Melanoma Trump said something like “Lawdy! Lawdy! Massah boss, yo shure do look fine!” of The Donald, then it would be no less true than when Obama’s squaw says it. If Melanoma wants some seafood, is she forbidden to say “Whe’s ma skrimps!?” Of course not – what is sauce for the gander is sauce for the … er… other gander.

Is Michelle Obama to be accused of “plagiarism” if she uses any word that Melanoma uses? (Well in her case, it probably would be, as we all know them Mammas have little imagination but that's not the point!)


Naturally, we accept that there’s a problem with Melanoma Trump – she’s foreign, and was not Solomon criticised for having “foreign wives”? [Yes, he was see 1Ki:11:8: And likewise did he for all his strange wives, which burnt incense and sacrificed unto their gods.] But Solomon and The Donald have so much in common, and in the same way that God made Solomon a great and wise Patriarch, so we see God’s design for Donald Trump.

CONCLUSION
Melanoma’s alleged plagiarism is, in fact, a sign that Donald Trump is God’s candidate.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Donald Trump’s wife and Plagiarism

Amen Brother Bathfire - men are out building important things like walls, golf courses, and estate compounds. It's the women that are given to frivolity, and frankly I don't have the time to check up on whether the housework is done to specification. They're always yapping about whatever Taylor Swift is up to, and despite my banning I still occasionally think I hear "Kardashian" pop up - but they always deny it.

What we have here is the feminazi emasculated MSM manginas clucking like hens grabbing the latest tabloids off the rack at the supermarket. If they ever bothered to fact check their LIEberal biases, they would have discovered that Michelle Obama plagiarized her speech in 2008 - but what would you expect from a pie stealing culture.

I have to hand it to Melanoma Trump - a brilliant twist to expose the loony left. Whatever we can expect from the future First Lady, I doubt we'll be subjected to 8 years of Melanoma Trump telling us what we and our kids can eat.

August 27, 2008
Michelle Obama Convention Speech Borrowed From Saul Alinsky

Even when doing her best to impersonate a Republican long enough to dupe voters into letting her into the White House, Michelle Obama can't help but betray the radical roots she shares with the Obamessiah. In her convention speech Monday she managed not to denounce America as "just downright mean" and not worth being proud of, but she did say this:

And Barack stood up that day, and he spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about "the world as it is" and "the world as it should be."

Maybe she's mixing up Barack with fellow extremist Saul Alinsky, who wrote this in his pernicious guide to replacing freedom with socialism, Rules for Radicals:

The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.

Or maybe Uhbama was borrowing again, like he did from fellow floundering post turtle Deval Patrick, and like his running mate is wont to do. It's also possible that as Gateway Pundit suggests, Michelle just happened to hear it in church:

On a tip from V the K.

http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/...e_obama_4.html

[Dr. Anthony J. Toole]

Re: Donald Trump’s wife and Plagiarism

Women talk so much, it reminds me of that story in the Bible about an infinite number of chimpanzees with typewriters eventually producing the works of Shakespeare. With enough talking (and there is plenty) they will eventually repeat eachother word for word - the only surprize it is doesn't happen more frequently than 2 times out of 3 Republican Presidential candidates.

As it stands, the speech was mostly drivel and even a wasted opportunity for Team Trump. It would have been better if she'd laid to rest the persistent problem about the size of Mr. Trump's hands. Yes, he has personally guaranteed there is no problem there:

Look at those hands, are those small hands? And he referred to my hands as if they’re small, something else may be small. I guarantee to you there’s no problem, I guarantee!

But it would surely sound better coming from his wife or one of his ex-wives. Obviously I trust Mr. Trump completely when he GUARANTEES something - but as the Gimper always said "Trust but verify", where by verify I mean get his current wife to describe how big his tallywacker is in her headline speech at the Republican convention.

[H. Montague Worthington]

Re: Donald Trump’s wife and Plagiarism

This entire furor is ridiculous! Words belong to everyone! No one OWNS ordinary English words, just because they're put into specific order. But let's say, just for the sake of argument, that there are some similarities here and there. So what? It's the INTENT and the UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORDS and WHAT'S IN YOUR HEART that matters!

Take the immortal words of Melania Trump, already acknowledged as one of America's greatest speakers.

"From a young age my parents impressed on me the values that you work hard for what you want in life; that your word is your bond and you do what you say and keep your promise; that you treat people with respect. They taught and showed me values and morals in their daily life." -- Melania Trump

Michelle Obama may have said something similar at one time or another, sure. She talks a lot-- way too much. But even if she did say something similar, she couldn't have said these words all together with the kind of deep, resonant meaning that Mrs. Trump had in her speech. Look at the facts:

1. Melania Trump had "parents"-- two of them. So referring to parents" would be impossible for Michelle Obama, because Negroes so rarely have more than one parent, and many times not even one. And whether they have zero, one, or in rare cases two parents, Negro parents are not parents in the sense that Normal people are parents.
2. Michelle Obama would never talk about having "values," keeping promises, or treating people with respect, because dozens of sociological studies have shown that Negroes value nothing except sex and food. They don't even know what the meaning of a "bond" is-- just look at how Negro men bounce around from one female to another. And any police video ever captured will show that sass-mouthed Negroes have no respect for law enforcement or civil society. Moreover, for Communist Black Pantheress Michelle Obama to enunciate words that attempt to form similar thoughts as Melania Trump expressed is as absurd as imagining a parrot knowing the meaning of "Polly want a cracker."
3. This speech was delivered in English, a language invented by White people. Therefore, Negroes have no rational claim or interest in the language, and it's really somewhat silly to say they have any "authorship" of particular words. If it weren't for White people, all the Negroes lucky enough to be in America would be grunting and clicking and gesturing and uttering nonsense noises like "Ooogah Booogah." Furthermore, Negroes only tend to use the English language in broken, sloppy pidgin form, and even then only as a rudimentary tool to acquire food and sex, or engage in crimes that can get them the food or sex they want-- their only interests of any kind.

So there you are. The idea that a beautiful, wealthy White woman married to a billionaire nominated for President of the United States would steal words from a crazy, uppity black lady from the South Side of Chicago is silly on its face.

A careful and rational comparison of the two speeches in question proves two things: First, Melania Trump is a genius-- an elegant and thoughtful woman who will be America's best first lady ever. And secondly, analysis of the Obama speech proves that Michelle Obama is an ignorant, violent animal trained so well by her handlers to mimic thoughtful discourse that many simplistic people in our country actually believe she is sentient being in her own right, and not the raving, violent beast we all know her to be.