X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • California Seeks Ban on Divorce

    In a move to protect traditional marriage even further than 2008’s Proposition 8, a Godly grassroots campaign has begun to ban divorce in California.

    Inspired by Proposition 8, which banned gay "marriage" in California, John Marcotte comments,
    California has a divorce rate that some have computed to be as high as 75%. Even after removing Zsa Zsa Gabor and Larry King from the pool — we still are left with a rate in the high 50s.
    Proposition 8 tried to make traditional marriage safer by making sure that Adam Lambert and Ryan Seacrest can’t profess their eternal love to one another. Prop 8 backers recognized that gay marriage was just the beginning of a very slippery slope. Next people would be marrying goats, trees and particularly stylish armchairs.

    But Prop 8 only attacked the problem from the edges. I’m going after the heart of the matter. That’s why I drafted the 2010 California Protection of Marriage Act to ban divorce in the state of California. If you can’t get divorced, you can’t destroy traditional marriage.
    The language of the ballot measure is laid out on the group’s website, www.rescuemarriage.org.
    2010 California Marriage Protection Amendment.

    SECTION 1. Title. This act shall be known as the “2010 California Marriage Protection Amendment.”

    SECTION 2. Section 7.6 is added to Article I of the California Constitution, to read:

    No party to any marriage shall be restored to the state of an unmarried person during the lifetime of the other party unless the marriage is void or voidable, as set forth in Part 2 of Division 6 of the Family Code.


    On the site, Marcotte points out the valid fact that, according to Jesus, divorce is adultery. As we know, adultery is sin, and sin leads to damnation. In this sense, Marcotte is incorrect when he says, “Jesus still loves you if you get divorced — just not as much as before“.*

    Christians, who supported Proposition 8, surely would also support this legislation to help their brethren and sistern avoid damnation! Only true hypocrites would not vote for it . . . and surely, there are no Christian hypocrites.

    Show your support for this bold initiative! You can become a fan of the movement on Facebook, or buy one of the nifty T-shirts pictured above.
    * – Do you believe that Jesus loves people that He will raise from the dead at Judgment so He can cast them into eternal torture as they burn alive forever in a vast lake of fire, rather than just leaving them dead?

    That’s a pretty sick way to demonstrate “love”. – Jenny
    www.palibandaily.com - Your Christian News Source
    Huckabee/Palin Gingrich 2012 will reclaim America for Christ! PRAISE!

    Christian Ladies:
    Savor your separation in style at the Monthly Visitor!

  • #2
    Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

    Originally posted by JennyD View Post
    In a move to protect traditional marriage even further than 2008’s Proposition 8, a Godly grassroots campaign has begun to ban divorce in California.

    Inspired by Proposition 8, which banned gay "marriage" in California, John Marcotte comments,
    California has a divorce rate that some have computed to be as high as 75%. Even after removing Zsa Zsa Gabor and Larry King from the pool — we still are left with a rate in the high 50s.
    Proposition 8 tried to make traditional marriage safer by making sure that Adam Lambert and Ryan Seacrest can’t profess their eternal love to one another. Prop 8 backers recognized that gay marriage was just the beginning of a very slippery slope. Next people would be marrying goats, trees and particularly stylish armchairs.

    But Prop 8 only attacked the problem from the edges. I’m going after the heart of the matter. That’s why I drafted the 2010 California Protection of Marriage Act to ban divorce in the state of California. If you can’t get divorced, you can’t destroy traditional marriage.
    The language of the ballot measure is laid out on the group’s website, www.rescuemarriage.org.
    2010 California Marriage Protection Amendment.

    SECTION 1. Title. This act shall be known as the “2010 California Marriage Protection Amendment.”

    SECTION 2. Section 7.6 is added to Article I of the California Constitution, to read:

    No party to any marriage shall be restored to the state of an unmarried person during the lifetime of the other party unless the marriage is void or voidable, as set forth in Part 2 of Division 6 of the Family Code.


    On the site, Marcotte points out the valid fact that, according to Jesus, divorce is adultery. As we know, adultery is sin, and sin leads to damnation. In this sense, Marcotte is incorrect when he says, “Jesus still loves you if you get divorced — just not as much as before“.*

    Christians, who supported Proposition 8, surely would also support this legislation to help their brethren and sistern avoid damnation! Only true hypocrites would not vote for it . . . and surely, there are no Christian hypocrites.

    Show your support for this bold initiative! You can become a fan of the movement on Facebook, or buy one of the nifty T-shirts pictured above.
    * – Do you believe that Jesus loves people that He will raise from the dead at Judgment so He can cast them into eternal torture as they burn alive forever in a vast lake of fire, rather than just leaving them dead?

    That’s a pretty sick way to demonstrate “love”. – Jenny
    Let's hope for everyones sake divorce will NEVER be banned!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

      Originally posted by BenHur44 View Post
      Let's hope for everyone's sake divorce will NEVER be banned!
      I bet you've never been married.
      sigpic


      “We must reassert that the essence of Christianity is the love of obedience to God’s Laws and that how that complete obedience is used or implemented does not concern us.”

      Author of such illuminating essays as,
      Map of the Known World; Periodic Table of Elements; The History of Linguistics; The Errors of Wicca; Dolphins and Evolution; The History of Landover (The Apology); Landover and the Civil War; 2000 Racial Slurs.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

        I've never understood the need for divorce. I've personally been married 3 times, and have not been divorced yet. Actually, 4 times if you count the girl who was unconscious from roofies when I created the marriage certificate with Photoshop. Boy, you should've seen the look on her face when I told her we were married - she fled the scene and I haven't seen her since!

        Anyway, the first wife is probably still down in Tijuana, working in the shack behind Pedro's Bar. After she kept bugging me for money, I stopped going to TJ for missionary work and moved my activities to Nogales, where I met this sweet young thing who was willing to do just anything for a Green Card. That worked out pretty well for awhile, but she should have layed off the tacos - once the stretch marks started showing, I decided it was off to Juarez, where I got hitched the third time. After I found out about what she was doing in them donkey shows, I decided to move again. Nowadays, I confine my missionary activities to Nuevo Laredo. I'm gonna try real hard not to get hitched again for awhile - I'm beginning to run out of border towns. Maybe I should join Brother Rush down there in the Dominican Republic.

        yours in Christ,
        Brother Buford
        yours in Christ,
        Brother Buford

        sigpic

        The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.
        - Rush Limbaugh

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

          Is this guy going to get mormon backing? Those crazy spacemen may be hellbound sinners, but they do put their money where their mouth is. They almost invested as much into prop 8 as we did. The queers are only 1% of the population. Sure, we ensured a bunch of hellbound faggots who are destined to an eternity of torture would not even be able to enjoy what little time they have on earth, but that's small potatoes. With this we get to ensure that a much larger group of hellbound sinners if forced to suffer here before taking on an eternity of even worse suffering. Hopefully this is help them to understand that marriage is for making babies, not having a good time and cutting out when the fun is over.
          Master of Godly Debating

          Latest Conquest:Sacred Heart

          Debate Record
          Currently Undefeated
          Lastest Debates:
          Catholic - Not Christian: Former Altar Boy/Molestation Victim with "Stockholm Syndrome" admits catholicism is false
          James Peter: Idiotic Catholic Retard Thwarted
          Vayhr of the Warhost: Unrepentant wigger struck down.
          Teflon: See the post that nailed him.
          86 Victories
          0 Defeats

          Past Victories (Archive):
          Uppity Atheist Pagan Witch finally keels over and DIES. America Wins Again!!!
          Uppity feeble minded witch needs to be taught how to debate
          Racist Nazi Feminazi Bulldyke CRUSHED in debate

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

            Well, I can support it as long as it follows biblical rules.

            These verses indicate that it is wrong to divorce unless your spouse is a Godless heathen.

            Mark chapter 10:6-12

            6But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female.

            7For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife;
            8And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
            9What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
            10And in the house his disciples asked him again of the same matter.
            11And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. 12And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.


            1 Corinthians 7:10-15

            10And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:

            11But and if she depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife.
            12But to the rest speak I, not the Lord: If any brother hath a wife that believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put her away.
            13And the woman which hath an husband that believeth not, and if he be pleased to dwell with her, let her not leave him.
            14For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband: else were your children unclean; but now are they holy. 15But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.

            However, Matthew tells us it is okay also if your wife is a fornicating whore.

            Matthew 19:9

            9And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.


            So, in my understanding, anybody can divorce if their spouse is an atheistic piece of trash who wants to leave. And men can divorce their wives if the hussy is whoring all over the place. If you are a man and divorce for any other reason, you can never remarry or it's adultery and you are living in sin like all the other heathens waiting to burn in hell.

            Women, it seems God's law says you can't divorce at all unless you are married to an unbeliever. So, whatever the state of Californication says, its laws do not take precedent over the laws of Almight God, Hallelujah! However, a Godly state law would help enforce some good Christian values on these Prostitutes for Satan running around the state of California.
            Jesus will return the favor with nails of truth and the hammer of righteousness.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

              In the verses above, the Lord is referring to Saved men. I have been divorced three times (twice from the same woman - long story, already told it), but that was before I was Saved and washed in the Blood of Jesus. Christ died for my sins, and as I was unsaved when I was divorced and sinning, the divorces are also forgiven.

              I don’t think it matters that I accepted Jesus into my heart previously, as the church I joined was not a True Christian™ church. Therefore, I was not actually Saved at the time, I just thought I was.
              sigpic


              Winging our Way Across the World for The Lord!



              God Bless John Boehner and God Bless the Grand Old Party!



              Barack Hussein Obama is not My President!!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

                Originally posted by Capt. A. Portway View Post
                In the verses above, the Lord is referring to Saved men. I have been divorced three times (twice from the same woman - long story, already told it), but that was before I was Saved and washed in the Blood of Jesus. Christ died for my sins, and as I was unsaved when I was divorced and sinning, the divorces are also forgiven.

                I don’t think it matters that I accepted Jesus into my heart previously, as the church I joined was not a True Christian™ church. Therefore, I was not actually Saved at the time, I just thought I was.

                You may be right, Capt. Portway. I'm was raised with a bit more conservative interpretation of the bible, and I'm trying to learn from the good Brothers here at Landover and keep my mind open for the wisdom here, Amen. And if your wife was not a member of a True Christian™ church, then she constitutes a non-believer anyway right?
                Jesus will return the favor with nails of truth and the hammer of righteousness.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: California Seeks Ban on Divorce

                  Hey, anyone seen the latest thing that the liberals are whining about? Check this out:

                  The Insurance Industry's Heartless Logic: Getting Beaten by Your Husband Is an Excuse to Deny Coverage

                  In eight states and the District of Columbia, being the victim of domestic violence is considered a pre-existing condition by insurance companies.
                  Now the Obamabots are talking about coming up with some new law to force Godly insurance companies to cover sluts who get beaten by their husbands. Hells bells, how are the insurance companies supposed to make a profit if they gotta pay a fortune every time some hussy opens her big mouth and provokes her husband, forcing him to hand out some discipline? Next thing you know, it's gonna be outright illegal to beat the Little Woman no matter what she does. Whatever happened to individual responsibility?

                  America had better take heed - it's all this bleedin' heart liberal stuff that caused the Roman Empire to collapse. The Romans passed a law making it illegal for a man to taser his wife - pretty soon the women got all uppity, henpecked their husbands to vote for Democrats, and the rest is history!

                  yours in Christ,
                  Brother Buford
                  yours in Christ,
                  Brother Buford

                  sigpic

                  The only way to reduce the number of nuclear weapons is to use them.
                  - Rush Limbaugh

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X