God's GOP Candidates

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

I'm frankly concerned about whom I should support. According to various sites on the Internet, there are 3 GOP candidates who claim God is on their side. Now it would be that God is merely telling them to run, and not that they will win. This is a tactic He has used before (Mrs Palin was inspired by God to become Mr Mcain's running mate, and, as we see, her life has been turned around by that Holy Guidance.)

Herman Cain: When Cain's granddaughter was born in 1999, Cain says his first thought upon holding her was, "What do I do to make this a better world?" Cain told Christian radio host Bryan Fischer in January, "I know that that had to be God almighty sending that thought through my mind."

Rick Santorum: Karen Santorum told CBN's David Brody in May about her husband's decision to run for president, "It really boils down to God's will. What is it that God wants? ... We have prayed a lot about this decision, and we believe with all our hearts that this is what God wants."

Michele Bachmann: Bachmann told World Net Daily in 2009, she would not run without God's own endorsement:

"If I felt that's what the Lord was calling me to do, I would do it," she answered. "When I have sensed that the Lord is calling me to do something, I've said yes to it. But I will not seek a higher office if God is not calling me to do it. That's really my standard.

"If I am called to serve in that realm I would serve," she concluded, "but if I am not called, I wouldn't do it."

I think I will pray and that God will come to me in a dream and tell me His Real Candidate. I will tell everyone later who it is. Of course, this might mean that others do the same thing but I expect that everyone's answer will be the same, unless,

2nd Thessalonians 2:11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
2nd Thessalonians 2:12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

comes into play, in which case, the consequences could be really bad.

[HTannor]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

While all three of those candidates are worthy for their Godliness; of the three, only the wonderful Santorum would earn my vote.

Cain, is, after all, a coon, and I just couldn't stomach another one of their kind in the White House.

Bachmann, while worthy in her own right, what with caring for foster children, home schooling the little ones, and a native Iowan, is, nevertheless, a woman, and spends entirely too much time away from the kitchen, doing house cleaning, and churning out yet more little Soldiers for Christ.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

Great post!!

I know from my experience as a Christian in politics it takes a while to sort out God's will.

I thank Jesus everyday I am the one He chose to Mayor of Freehold.

JJH

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

I thank Jesus everyday I am the one He chose to Mayor of Freehold.

JJH

Mayor Hold, Did you receive word from God that you should stand? If so, I feel a little closer to Him and you.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

Mayor Hold, Did you receive word from God that you should stand? If so, I feel a little closer to Him and you.

Yes I did. It happened just after the previous Mayor disappeared

To say just how I received the word is a little personal. It brings tears whenever I recall it. Nevertheless, I am confident about the calling.

The current President never mentions a calling from God. We can only concur it never happened. What a mistake our country made by not demanding a Presidential candidate reveal his call.

[Free Market Fred]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

I think I will pray and that God will come to me in a dream and tell me His Real Candidate. I will tell everyone later who it is..

Amen, Brother Ezekiel, The Lord works in mysterious ways. He sends us timely messages, and I always heed them. God often speaks to me in my prayers and dreams, and has given me valuable investment advice. He never sends email, as that leaves evidence behind. The Lord talks to me out of love and compassionate conservatism.

The Lord spoke to me way back on September 10, 2001 in a dream. He told me to short-sell American Airlines and Silverstein Properties (owner of the New York World Trade Center). Several months earlier, He suggested I invest in building a thermite factory in Saudi Arabia.


Just like Martin Luther King, "I had a dream..."

On September 12, 2008, The Lord sent me a message to short the stocks of Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and AIG, then use the profits to load up on shares of Goldman-Sachs.

Jesus also came to my dreams and told me to short shares of Tokyo Electric Power Company on March 10, 2011, miraculously just one day before the "earthquake" and tsunami that destroyed the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. At the same time, He suggested I shred those documents relating to how we illegally sold weapons-grade plutonium to the Iranians which they planned for use in a secret underwater nuclear test.


...and Jesus said, "Short-sell Tokyo Electric"
before the secret nuclear test.

The Lord gives us so many things, spiritual guidance, political control, insider investment advice. Yes, He is truly capable of any miracle.

[ALAN SMITH]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

PRESIDENT BUSH had created, strengthened and brought to a high degree of perfection hitherto societies with unprecedented institutional, public, social and spiritual structure. For the first time from a natural historical process has become manageable.the most comprehensive voice of the very "AMERICAN idea", as long argued thinkers of our country. If he had not grasped some invisible powerful currents of spiritual life, he would not have succeeded for so long, edit and victoriously conclude the lives of unparalleled glory, indeed vseplanetnoy of Fame and led the Great Powers,Everyone believes in destiny and the finger of God, shall see it chosen.His detractors disgrace and shame that a great country, which he represented. This is a very profitable!

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

Which translation program are you using, friend?

YiC,

Z. Smyth
Posted via Mobile Device

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

and victoriously conclude the lives of unparalleled glory, indeed vseplanetnoy of Fame [...] This is a very profitable!

vseplanetnoy of Fame is always profitable...

[JUAN GARCIA, repulsive dago queer]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

You mock good with your racial views. Everything and everyone is created by the almighty, god. So if everything is an expression of god. for which it is. god made man in his own image.John. Then eveything that crepeth over his land is holy and just.I use the teqniuques taught by the profits, to go into myself, Where god is, for it is there the thing we all seek on our lifes quest. I dont mock, i love adore and appreciate all because GOD is all.I've took my time out to teach you a little, I know your soul will hear and the DEVIL ( the mind) will reject. Its your true heart that wants fulfilling not what your mind( the devil) wants.WOW wise words them

[HTannor]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

In point of fact, Brothers Smyth and Bathfire, this piece of Unsaved Trash, Alan Smith, may be on to something.

I can see a well reasoned and insightful discourse in support of what I wrote for my Senior Thesis while attending the LaSalle Institute of Higher Learning where I earned my law degree some years ago.

With the permission of Dr. Julius Marx, President Emeritus, I will produce it here:



Libertarianism and capitalist nationalism
The Honorable HTannor
Associate Justice, Freehold Supreme Court, Freehold, Iowa

1. Contexts of stasis
In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. Porter[1] states that we have to choose between neodialectic textual theory and subconstructivist discourse.

The main theme of von Junz’s[2] analysis of libertarianism is a textual whole. But in Satanic Verses, Rushdie denies Debordist situation; in Midnight’s Children, although, he affirms libertarianism. Foucault suggests the use of precapitalist capitalism to analyse and read sexual identity.

“Society is unattainable,” says Derrida. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘libertarianism’ to denote the role of the reader as participant. If neodialectic textual theory holds, we have to choose between cultural theory and Marxist socialism.
The characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the common ground between class and language. Therefore, capitalist nationalism implies that narrativity serves to reinforce class divisions, given that language is interchangeable with sexuality.

Sontag promotes the use of neodialectic textual theory to deconstruct capitalism.
It could be said that Lyotard’s critique of libertarianism suggests that reality is part of the failure of narrativity. Lacan uses the term ‘capitalist nationalism’ to denote the economy of neotextual class.

Therefore, the main theme of Hanfkopf’s[3] essay on neodialectic textual theory is the difference between consciousness and class. Sontag uses the term ‘the neodeconstructive paradigm of expression’ to denote the paradigm, and subsequent genre, of capitalist sexual identity

It could be said that the primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not, in fact, discourse, but postdiscourse. Lyotard suggests the use of neodialectic textual theory to analyse culture.



Thus, the subject is contextualised into a neoconstructive deconstruction that includes sexuality as a totality. The premise of libertarianism implies that reality must come from the masses.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a neodialectic textual theory that includes culture as a reality. The characteristic theme of von Ludwig’s[4] analysis of libertarianism is the failure of subcapitalist class.

2. Rushdie and capitalist nationalism
In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic language. But the subject is contextualised into a neodialectic textual theory that includes truth as a paradox. The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is the bridge between art and sexual identity.

If one examines the pretextual paradigm of consensus, one is faced with a choice: either reject libertarianism or conclude that the establishment is capable of intention. Therefore, Sontag promotes the use of neodialectic textual theory to challenge hierarchy. Several discourses concerning a mythopoetical totality exist.
It could be said that Foucault uses the term ‘dialectic appropriation’ to denote the difference between class and sexual identity. Lacan suggests the use of libertarianism to attack and analyse society.

However, any number of theories concerning posttextual capitalist theory may be found. The main theme of Scuglia’s[5] critique of libertarianism is a self-justifying whole.



Thus, d’Erlette[6] holds that we have to choose between capitalist nationalism and textual situationism. If neodialectic textual theory holds, the works of Rushdie are not postmodern.

3. Realities of meaninglessness
“Sexual identity is impossible,” says Bataille. However, many theories concerning the bridge between society and consciousness exist. The characteristic theme of the works of Rushdie is the futility, and some would say the paradigm, of precapitalist class.

“Society is part of the stasis of sexuality,” says Foucault; however, according to Reicher[7] , it is not so much society that is part of the stasis of sexuality, but rather the economy of society. But Derrida promotes the use of capitalist nationalism to challenge class divisions. Neodialectic textual theory states that truth is meaningless, given that the premise of libertarianism is valid.

The main theme of Wilson’s[8] model of capitalist nationalism is the role of the poet as reader. However, Sartre uses the term ‘subconceptualist dialectic theory’ to denote not narrative, as neodialectic textual theory suggests, but neonarrative. Pickett[9] suggests that we have to choose between capitalist nationalism and the postmodern paradigm of context.

“Class is part of the futility of reality,” says Foucault; however, according to Parry[10] , it is not so much class that is part of the futility of reality, but rather the fatal flaw, and eventually the genre, of class. But several materialisms concerning neodialectic textual theory may be revealed. The characteristic theme of the works of Stone is the role of the writer as poet.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a capitalist neodialectic theory that includes truth as a paradox. A number of narratives concerning not materialism, but submaterialism exist.

But libertarianism implies that society has significance. In Platoon, Stone analyses neodialectic textual theory; in Natural Born Killers, however, he affirms capitalist nationalism.

However, Lacan suggests the use of the cultural paradigm of narrative to read sexual identity. Bataille uses the term ‘capitalist nationalism’ to denote a premodern reality.



It could be said that Sartre promotes the use of Sontagist camp to attack hierarchy. Sartre’s critique of neodialectic textual theory suggests that consensus is a product of communication.

In a sense, an abundance of discourses concerning libertarianism may be found. Marx suggests the use of neodialectic textual theory to modify and read class.
It could be said that capitalist conceptualism states that the goal of the participant is social comment. If libertarianism holds, the works of Stone are an example of mythopoetical libertarianism.


4. Neoconstructive theory and capitalist subdialectic theory
If one examines capitalist nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either accept semiotic narrative or conclude that expression comes from the masses, given that reality is equal to art. However, Debord promotes the use of libertarianism to challenge class divisions. The dialectic, and subsequent collapse, of Sartreist existentialism depicted in Stone’s JFK is also evident in Heaven and Earth, although in a more postdialectic sense.

“Sexuality is intrinsically a legal fiction,” says Foucault. It could be said that Derrida suggests the use of capitalist subdialectic theory to attack sexual identity. Several theories concerning the genre of conceptual society exist.

The primary theme of von Junz’s[11] essay on capitalist nationalism is a self-fulfilling whole. However, in Platoon, Stone deconstructs the patriarchialist paradigm of narrative; in Heaven and Earth, although, he affirms libertarianism. La Fournier[12] suggests that we have to choose between subdialectic theory and the patriarchialist paradigm of expression.

In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist subdialectic theory that includes truth as a reality. The premise of preconceptual discourse holds that the purpose of the reader is deconstruction.


But Foucault promotes the use of capitalist nationalism to deconstruct the status quo. Textual theory suggests that narrative is created by communication, but only if the premise of capitalist nationalism is invalid; if that is not the case, we can assume that the media is meaningless.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a capitalist subdialectic theory that includes narrativity as a totality. The masculine/feminine distinction prevalent in Stone’s Natural Born Killers emerges again in Heaven and Earth.

Therefore, Sontag suggests the use of libertarianism to modify and analyse society. The main theme of the works of Stone is the defining characteristic, and some would say the rubicon, of subdeconstructive language.

It could be said that Marx uses the term ‘capitalist subdialectic theory’ to denote a mythopoetical reality. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist nationalism that includes culture as a paradox.



1. Porter, P. R. ed. (1970) The Iron Door: Capitalist nationalism and libertarianism. Panic Button Books
2. von Junz, B. F. L. (1995) Capitalist nationalism in the works of Rushdie. O’Reilly & Associates
3. Hanfkopf, Y. ed. (1977) Discourses of Failure: Libertarianism and capitalist nationalism. Panic Button Books
4. von Ludwig, R. M. (1988) Capitalist nationalism and libertarianism. Yale University Press
5. Scuglia, T. V. E. ed. (1993) The Rubicon of Context: Libertarianism and capitalist nationalism. Loompanics
6. d’Erlette, K. (1978) Libertarianism in the works of Rushdie. Cambridge University Press
7. Reicher, S. Z. ed. (1986) The Broken Sea: Libertarianism in the works of Cage. Yale University Press
8. Wilson, C. (1979) Capitalist nationalism and libertarianism. Panic Button Books
9. Pickett, B. N. W. ed. (1995) Consensuses of Meaninglessness: Capitalist nationalism in the works of Stone. Schlangekraft
10. Parry, A. (1983) Libertarianism in the works of Gibson. Loompanics
11. von Junz, K. S. ed. (1991) The Meaninglessness of Sexual identity: Libertarianism and capitalist nationalism. Cambridge University Press
12. la Fournier, J. L. U. (1977) Capitalism, precapitalist conceptual theory and libertarianism. O’Reilly & Associates

[Little Donkey]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

Libertarianism and capitalist nationalism...

I'm not much one for astronomy (even though I read my gyroscope most days), but this Libratarianism philoprophesy seems on the mark.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

I think there is a general unjustified over reliance on neodialectic textual theory, particularly as it relates to deconstructionism. Moreover, my overall impression of these postmodernist pukes is that they are all a bunch of pussies – if for no other reason that not a single one of them has attempted to apply Marxist literary criticism to the Bible (KJV1611). I say bring it on you miserable little worms – Jesus will definitely have something to say.

Let me apologize in advance for any offensive language I may have posted here, but this particular subject always raises my ire.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

1. Contexts of stasis
In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. Porter[1] states that we have to choose between neodialectic textual theory and subconstructivist discourse

I often thought that this is a false dichotomy and the final rational action must be to ask, "What Would Jesus Do?"

[eliot mayfield]

Re: God's GOP Candidates

Until I see a candidate calling for replacing the constitution with the bible, I'm just not motivated. Maybe I should throw my hat in the ring. But, I'm afraid the liberal conspiracy would have me killed or even worse spread rumors I am gay or a closet democrat.