[chucknorrisisgod]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

repent of your blasphemy. The Bible is pure truth. It is God's own word.

I find it odd that every other post you reference God as if you believe in Him.

The bible was written by a man who wanted control. And I assume you would be referring to my use of Him as "Him" While I do not believe in Him, I know as a rule of grammar it He would be a title, and must be capitalized.
I have read the bible, I found it to be an interesting read, But no different than Marx's Communist Manifesto. A ploy for complete control.

[Meek and Humble]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

I'm pathetic? You're the one who made it up in the first place....

Ok then

Don't bother. Nobody believes you.

[wait_what]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

The bible was written by a man who wanted control. And I assume you would be referring to my use of Him as "Him" While I do not believe in Him, I know as a rule of grammar it He would be a title, and must be capitalized.
I have read the bible, I found it to be an interesting read, But no different than Marx's Communist Manifesto. A ploy for complete control.

Do you have scripture to back this up?

[Halomania]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

First off, as an Atheist I'm not miserable.
"As researcher Gregory Paul puts it: “In general, higher rates of belief in and worship of a creator correlate with higher rates of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, venereal disease, teen pregnancy, and abortion.” Whereas according to Pope Benedict’s argument, the United States, one of the world’s most religious countries, should be a crime-free paradise, while secular Sweden should be a vortex of crime and violence."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_S._Paul

Excuse me but this idea of humans coming from monkeys is not at all what the theory of evolution states. Perhaps you need more schooling! The other position you take is the nonsence that monkeys would not exist if some thing evolved from them. That's just ridiculous! There are many kinds of monkeys each having evolved in its own way. And yes modern monkeys have evolved, too., from something in the distant past. Why do you think that if man had evolved from monkeys that there would not still be monkeys? Your lack of logic is astounding!

No we do not think the Bjg Bang created our Earth and our Universe. The Big Bang theory, which remains somewhat tenuous, is about the creation of our Univrse. I suggest you do something to educate yourself about this, also. Of course, we don`t know what came before the Big Bang. We may never know. It`s like asking what came before god and saying that he has always been. What hogwash!

The last statement you made about dinosaurs existing side-by-side with humans certainly puts you in a position of denial or one of the most poorly educated people on our Earth. And this idea is not worth comment.

I do find your hate to be a bit repellent. But, people who can`t get beyond their shared fantacies are often like that. And, please quit trying to prey upon Atheist. You can`t win with your mind full of deceit.

[Brother Harold Porter]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

First off, as an Atheist I'm not miserable.

Yet, all the bottled up anger and hatred in your post. Jesus obviously brought you here for a reason, my friend. Will you come to Him and give thanks for His Creation?

Life is so much easier when we admit that we are wrong and finally understand the truth of the KJV1611 Bible. Salvation awaits, but you must admit that you are a foul sinner with a corrupt soul.

In Christ

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

First off, as an Atheist I'm not miserable.
"As researcher Gregory Paul puts it: “In general, higher rates of belief in and worship of a creator correlate with higher rates of homicide, juvenile and early adult mortality, venereal disease, teen pregnancy, and abortion.” Whereas according to Pope Benedict’s argument, the United States, one of the world’s most religious countries, should be a crime-free paradise, while secular Sweden should be a vortex of crime and violence."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregory_S._Paul

Excuse me but this idea of humans coming from monkeys is not at all what the theory of evolution states. Perhaps you need more schooling! The other position you take is the nonsence that monkeys would not exist if some thing evolved from them. That's just ridiculous! There are many kinds of monkeys each having evolved in its own way. And yes modern monkeys have evolved, too., from something in the distant past. Why do you think that if man had evolved from monkeys that there would not still be monkeys? Your lack of logic is astounding!

We have plenty of logic friend went to comes to this stuff. Many say we are full of it when it comes to scientific knowledge. I am willing to put my logic against yours any day of the week.

Okay, we may share a common ancestor with a monkey, but what about FISH??? According to your insane theory we evolved from FISH. This means we share a common ancestor with SHARKS! Where are the LAND SHARKS???

Monkeys use tools and live on the ground. Why don't SHARKS?

The last statement you made about dinosaurs existing side-by-side with humans certainly puts you in a position of denial or one of the most poorly educated people on our Earth. And this idea is not worth comment.

Logically, if your theory is true (which I don't accept for a moment) our ancestors existed side by side with dinosaurs - right? Or did we spontaneously generate from the elements some time after the Triassic?

[Halomania]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

We have plenty of logic friend went to comes to this stuff. Many say we are full of it when it comes to scientific knowledge. I am willing to put my logic against yours any day of the week.

Okay, we may share a common ancestor with a monkey, but what about FISH??? According to your insane theory we evolved from FISH. This means we share a common ancestor with SHARKS! Where are the LAND SHARKS???

Monkeys use tools and live on the ground. Why don't SHARKS?

"Full of it," is an interesting way of putting it. Of course, you'll have to go a long way back to find a common ancestor with the shark. Howvever, similar parts of our DNA can be found in sharks and can be found in bacteria even.

But, since you've agreed that there is a common ancestor for monkeys and humans you need go no further except for your own learning as you have agreed that evolution is the truth.

Thanks for your agreement.

[Halomania]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Yet, all the bottled up anger and hatred in your post. Jesus obviously brought you here for a reason, my friend. Will you come to Him and give thanks for His Creation?

Life is so much easier when we admit that we are wrong and finally understand the truth of the KJV1611 Bible. Salvation awaits, but you must admit that you are a foul sinner with a corrupt soul.

Interesting that you are unable to sustain a discussion with any facts. You know, for people, such as yourself, the truth lays beneath blankets of fear. It is not I that is bottled up with hate but yourself, dear sir. Quit being blinded by the light and look out at a wondrous world that has taken about 14 billion years to become the beauty we see before us today. Quit hiding behind your myths and join a world of wonder.

But not only of wonder. It is also a world damaged greatly by humans and their tyranny and domination over this tiny speck of a planet. Come to the real truth and urge people, not to believe in myths, but to work toward world peace. Get up and talk to your leaders of government and tell them to put aside their eagerness for war and to truly work for peace in our time.

You, when I compare me with you, it is not me that is angered but yourself. Please refrain from name calling! I am not a corrupt soul and nor am I a foul sinner. Please keep your name calling out of this.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

"Full of it," is an interesting way of putting it. Of course, you'll have to go a long way back to find a common ancestor with the shark. Howvever, similar parts of our DNA can be found in sharks and can be found in bacteria even.

But, since you've agreed that there is a common ancestor for monkeys and humans you need go no further except for your own learning as you have agreed that evolution is the truth.

Thanks for your agreement.

Friend,

Do not play the fool. It is reasonable to assume there is a "for the sake of the argument I will accept,.." before my statement. As a TRUE Christians, washed clean in The Blood of Our Loving SAVIOR I am a firm believer, that as real as Heaven is the earth is 6000 years old.

Am I clear?

Now, why no Land Sharks?

[Johansen]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

But not only of wonder. It is also a world damaged greatly by humans and their tyranny and domination over this tiny speck of a planet. Come to the real truth and urge people, not to believe in myths, but to work toward world peace. Get up and talk to your leaders of government and tell them to put aside their eagerness for war and to truly work for peace in our time.

You are right! I will burn my bible and become a hippie! Thank you for your great arguments!

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

What's the deal here - Atheists are cowards?

Come on God mockers, this should be an easy one; why no land sharks?

We are waiting

I will convert to Atheism if any Atheist gives me a good reason why no Land Sharks.

[Lanfeust]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

What's the deal here - Atheists are cowards?

Come on God mockers, this should be an easy one; why no land sharks?

We are waiting

I will convert to Atheism if any Atheist gives me a good reason why no Land Sharks.

so, why no land sharks?

Why would sharks go to the land? To go after us? Why? Were not their primary source of food, but other fish and sea mammels, why must they go out of the waters?

Animals don't evolve just for their pleasure for chasing humans but because they adapt to their environment and at stake of their survival. Sharks are perfectly adapted to the sea and have a perfect manner of life.

They don't evolve walking legs because the sharks don't have a adapted bone structure or even environmental factors where the evolution can be triggered.

I can easily ask,

Why no flying humans?

Why no miles high plants?

Because there is no reason for it, they evolve and adapt to the environment.

Plants don't need to go miles high because they ahve already enough light and humans don't have wings because we don't need the locomotion of flight.

I hope it's a bit clearer, but if you want a very good explanation about evolution, just read some books or do some research and you will maybe find a more resourcefull answer. Because I don't think you understand evolution itself.

[Callisto]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Why no flying humans? humans don't have wings because we don't need the locomotion of flight.

Speak for yourself, hombre.

[Johansen]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

so, why no land sharks?

Why would sharks go to the land? To go after us? Why? Were not their primary source of food, but other fish and sea mammels, why must they go out of the waters?

Why not? Why did they go into the water in the first place?
In the world where evolution exists, they can go into, but not out of the water? What happened to the monkeys you claim crawled out of the water?
Your logic is flawed!

Animals don't evolve just for their pleasure for chasing humans but because they adapt to their environment and at stake of their survival. Sharks are perfectly adapted to the sea and have a perfect manner of life.

And they would not be perfectly "adapted" at land because...? Obviously, chasing down humans would be much easier than hunting seals. Have you seen how fast those little rascals are?

They don't evolve walking legs because the sharks don't have a adapted bone structure or even environmental factors where the evolution can be triggered.

Well evolution would obviously just make it grow them then. Did "primordial" fish have that structure you speak of? No!

I can easily ask,
Why no flying humans?

Why no miles high plants?
Because there is no reason for it, they evolve and adapt to the environment.
[/QUOTE]
No, because The Lord made it so! That is why!

I hope it's a bit clearer, but if you want a very good explanation about evolution, just read some books or do some research and you will maybe find a more resourcefull answer. Because I don't think you understand evolution itself.

We have done PLENTY of reading!


Can't you see how you are just going in circles?

[Lanfeust]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Why not? Why did they go into the water in the first place?
In the world where evolution exists, they can go into, but not out of the water? What happened to the monkeys you claim crawled out of the water?
Your logic is flawed!


And they would not be perfectly "adapted" at land because...? Obviously, chasing down humans would be much easier than hunting seals. Have you seen how fast those little rascals are?


Well evolution would obviously just make it grow them then. Did "primordial" fish have that structure you speak of? No!


Why no miles high plants?
Because there is no reason for it, they evolve and adapt to the environment.

No, because The Lord made it so! That is why!



We have done PLENTY of reading!


Can't you see how you are just going in circles?
[/QUOTE]

Me in circles? The bible argument is the most typical circle argument known to man.

So they are in the water because they were in the water in the first place. So my logic stays the same, why must they go out of the water without any evolutionary factor's?

Monkey's didn't crawl out of the water but evolved on the land from primary mammels who his ancestor's were reptiles and so further... Some mammels went back in the water environment who then became whales and others marine mammals. I never NEVER said monkey's came out of the water fully formed. Only you people make such claims.

Humans are not such easy preys, there aren't even many sharks victims, why would they be so interrested in humans. They ARE atapte to hunt seals, fish, ect..

The bone structures of sharks are unique to their kind, not land animals. Sharks and other fish doesn't 'pop' new genetic information in their DNA. Evolution doesn't work the way you think it is, it doesn't do

'hey what about WALKING SHARKS??? Let's make those.'

No

And that 'god made it so' is just lazy. Occam's razor does say the simplest expaination is probably the right one, it's also likely to be the logical one and I don't think a magical never proved being from unknown orgins with a zombie halfgod son is logical.