[James Hutchins]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

furthermore being "gay" is not a sin anywhere in the while acting on gay impulses is a sin not just being gay. so your move christians.

all im saying is the only evidence you have that the bible is the word of god is that someone told you that. and THATS ALL THE EVIDENCE YOU HAVE!!!!



now you guys are just laughable you think biblical contradictions are porn


IT WAS "WRITTEN BY GOD" ARE YOU SAYING GOD MADE PORN

HAHAHAHA

<<< danish gay Porn Link Removed - Admin >>>

this is not porn these are a lists of sex contradictions and if you take away for that then you have truly lost any argument for your faith

Friend, you cannot lure decent people into having 'cybersex'. It will not happen. The DoF is onto you.

Further more, we do not argue, we praise God. You are just upset you cannot con the faithful.

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity.

Maths please. You can make an introductory post here

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

What do you mean by maths? Do you want me to provide the evidence behind the singularity?

[Pim Pendergast]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

What do you mean by maths? Do you want me to provide the evidence behind the singularity?

That would be a good start. An assertion is not evidence. But as Sister Mitza said, you should introduce yourself to us properly.

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Okay, so scientists have been able to identify how the universe began to within 1/10 of a second from when it happened. What we have found is expansion. This supports the idea that a small space containing all that would be in the universe expanded quickly, causing the Big Bang. They have also used the red shift detected from stars to show that the universe is still expanding, which supports the idea of expansion.

[Pim Pendergast]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Okay, so scientists have been able to identify how the universe began to within 1/10 of a second from when it happened. What we have found is expansion. This supports the idea that a small space containing all that would be in the universe expanded quickly, causing the Big Bang. They have also used the red shift detected from stars to show that the universe is still expanding, which supports the idea of expansion.

Atheist?

If not, tell us what church you go to, your favorite Bible verse, and how you came to faith in Christ.

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Yes I am an Athiest. I though that would be obvious from my posts.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Yes I am an Athiest. I though that would be obvious from my posts.

As a self identified atheist you are just proving that your a priori assumption that there is no God is the fundamental problem here.

You are trying to prove that the universe isn't made by God and any fool knows you can't prove a negative; it does not matter how many set squares or white coats you own.

YIC

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

I assume that this is based of the ideas of James Randi, but didn't he also state that people claiming the existence of something must give evidence as well. Please provide your evidence.

By the way, don't use the Bible because using something that is circularly justified is not real evidence.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Hello and welcome to our friendly forums. You can read all kinds of helpful information ON THIS THREAD for newcomers like yourself. If you’d like to share your opinion, kindly provide the Scriptural Support where we can see how wonderfully God said it first. Your rights on our forum can be found HERE. And finally please refrain from such ad hominem attacks as comparing a decent, God-fearing True Christian™ to an atheist clown-for-hire like James Randi. It not only makes you look like a greater fool, but it prevents you from opening your mind and seeing the Truth(c). Thank you.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

I assume that this is based of the ideas of James Randi, but didn't he also state that people claiming the existence of something must give evidence as well. Please provide your evidence.

By the way, don't use the Bible because using something that is circularly justified is not real evidence.

No it is based on the scientific method and a philosophical positivism.

But you would need a higher eduction to realise that.

YIC

[PraiseHawking]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

=scientific method and a philosophical positivism.

Please explain to me the scientific method that proves the Bible.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

Please explain to me the scientific method that proves the Bible.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: 101 reasons why Atheists are WRONG !!!

How's the introductory post coming along? It doesn't have to be a very good post. At first my posts were all weird because I had only used the one browser and then it crashed or something so I had to use a different browser or I was on a different computer or I can't remember now but anyway, I saw all these peculiar fonts and all different sized text and thought "who's this crackpot?" and then saw it was me because the other browser didn't recognise ¾ of what the other other one did but you are having a different problem viz:

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

1) You seem to be having things all mixed up. God is all powerful because, with respect to the universe He created, He is greater than the sum total of its constituent parts. Since "universe" signifies that of which there is only one i.e. everything that exists whether we can observe it or not (which means that your dopey "multiverse" models collapse because however many of them there may be they still fall within the category "everything that exists whether we can observe it or not" I could demonstrate that using set theory, it's pretty basic really). Therefore when God speaks (He uses the Imperative mood incidentally) what He says may be relied on. If it were not so the universe would not exist. As you can see, there is no begging the question going on here.

Based on what you've posted so far, I probably wouldn't read one of your books much beyond the subtitle. The veracity of what you claimed in its pages is a question that would never arise.

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

2) Simple biology. Well what you have here is not biology at all. It is simple however. Your pope, Richard Dawkins, frequently addresses exactly the error you hiss. Just because some nutter has this theory how worms turn into Chinese hairless dogs (which is obviously ridiculous) does not mean we have not understood what the "theory" actually claims. Normally it's discussed at junior school level. Perhaps you missed that day?

It is because we understand what maniacs (such as the Dawkins) have to say that we are able to discern their error. Yes, at school there are young and impressionable minds for the Godless science of atheism to warp and corrupt. Their ignorance is exploited. But the full grown evolutionary biologist has no such excuse. His aim is to destroy God's Plan to remove the disgusting sin that brims in each newborn baby so that it and all its siblings will never hear The Gospel winding up in HELL FOREVER.

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

3) Singularity. Originally what masquerades as "physics" these days came under the umbrella of alchemy but even so, some elements of the subject remain in Valence Bond Theory which you must have been taught at some stage if you're interested in chemistry. Again, without understanding these satanic lies it would be impossible for us to point out how they contradict Scripture which, as has already been demonstrated, is The Inerrant Word of God. According to nitwits such as Sam Harris, who addresses this point frequently, the whole point of your "singularity" is that it must be causeless. The maths would be needed to describe its location. If there were a singularity, where was it?

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

4) Job 40 . picture . etymology