X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    Are you still on about that stupid, non-existent apple???
    It got us thrown out of the Garden of Eden and brought Original Sin into the world! Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ died for that apple, can you blame us for being bitter?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Are you still on about that stupid, non-existent apple???

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    How stupid.
    Seems like men are allowed to do everything in your religion, yet if a woman does it, it's a sin.
    Look what happened the last time a woman was allowed to make a decision about something! It was a disaster, and we're determined not to let it happen again.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    No, polygamy as in one man, many wives can be virtuous. Polyandry; one woman, many husbands is depraved, unnatural and some kind of sick behavior that makes Jesus weep you would expect out of some Domatrix and her male slave sluts. Why any male would want to debase himself that way, living his entire life, eating out of a dog dish, at the booted feet of some cruel woman, is beyond me Rachael. No Jesus wants us men to be fawned over by or passive plural wives who wait on us men hand and foot. That is a proper and virtuous relationship.
    How stupid.
    Seems like men are allowed to do everything in your religion, yet if a woman does it, it's a sin.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    That's nothing! That was probably edited too! Quit trying to mess with my mind!
    The point was you were saying bigamy/polygamy 'leads to depraved behavior' etc, and I was saying that it's even mentioned in the bible which you believe in! Solomon for example!

    No, polygamy as in one man, many wives can be virtuous. Polyandry; one woman, many husbands is depraved, unnatural and some kind of sick behavior that makes Jesus weep you would expect out of some Domatrix and her male slave sluts. Why any male would want to debase himself that way, living his entire life, eating out of a dog dish, at the booted feet of some cruel woman, is beyond me Rachael. No Jesus wants us men to be fawned over by or passive plural wives who wait on us men hand and foot. That is a proper and virtuous relationship.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    That's nothing! That was probably edited too! Quit trying to mess with my mind!
    The point was you were saying bigamy/polygamy 'leads to depraved behavior' etc, and I was saying that it's even mentioned in the bible which you believe in! Solomon for example!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    No it isn't! Before, it said 'it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eve and Steve'! Dammit!! I know what I saw

    What ever you think you saw I know I didn't edit it ; after all my hole point was Adam had two wives, not Eve had two husbands. The clue would be your quote matches my post.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    No it isn't! Before, it said 'it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Eve and Steve'! Dammit!! I know what I saw

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    That isn't fair, BJ edited his post. That isn't what it said before.
    No Rachael, that is what it said all along.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    That isn't fair, BJ edited his post. That isn't what it said before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Pastor Al E Pistle View Post
    Lookit, Icky. Parents don't name kids Adia, Ixi and Peregrine.
    Correction: Sober, Christian parents don't name their kids that.
    Originally posted by BJ
    Yes well it was Adam and Lilith and Eve.
    Originally posted by Van Halen
    And wasn't it Adam and Lilith and Eve?
    How do you even respond to a question like that? Words fail me.
    Or, to put it another way:

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by MoonFlower View Post
    Wow...I thought I was the only one who fantasized like that about BJ.
    Now whoever could resist a muumuu?

    (I'll stop with these derailing comments soon, I swear )

    Leave a comment:


  • MoonFlower
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    Well, can't a married woman fantasize about the irresistable Bobby Joe sitting atop his stallion proudly wearing a white muumuu?
    Wow...I thought I was the only one who fantasized like that about BJ.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daisy Mae Johnson
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    More than a double D cup is a waste.

    those man made stretch marks are unsightly.

    Indignant, Sister Thumper

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: looking for some goodtimes - 23

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Yes well it was Adam and Lilith and Eve, not Adam and Steve and Eve. I won't have any truck with that kind of left coast nonsense you want to drag me into Missy. So enough of those witch-shot stones with little I-Heart-BJ painted on them. They've cost me three gardeners to witch induced stroke so far and Mexicans do not grow on trees I will have you know.
    Ooohhh, I'm so sorry! I thought I was aiming for you! *snicker*
    And wasn't it Adam and Lilith (not ours) and Eve?

    To continue with this Thread regarding an immoral strumpet with obviously fake Ladybits, I can only give you all a warning.
    These 3 females
    have gone down that same path of mutilation of their Ladyparts.
    Shortly after this picture was taken the women in this picture caught a Plane and ended up dying a horrible death after those Silicon filled appendages exploded.
    That's disgusting beyond words. Those three are the stuff of nightmares

    Leave a comment:

Working...