[Morgsara]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

Considering that my mother is Jewish, I'm not a Nazi.
Considering that I'm heterosexual, I'm not a lesbian.
Considering that I'm agnostic, I don't hate God, I explore different interpretations of a divine power.
Considering that I'm agnostic, I do not think Eve was created second. I believe in evolution.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

=Morgsara;632448]

Considering that my mother is Jewish, I'm not a Nazi.

Just because you are a Joo does not mean you can not be a Nazi

Considering that I'm heterosexual, I'm not a lesbian.

How many children do you have?

Considering that I'm agnostic, I don't hate God, I explore different interpretations of a divine power.

God is the only Divine Power, cant you read?

Considering that I'm agnostic, I do not think Eve was created second. I believe in evolution

Its in the Bible, God created everything. There is no such thing as evolution, unless you really believe you are related to monkeys

[Morgsara]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

Why would I affiliate with the people who destroyed my ancestors?

I am sixteen, can't you read? No kids at the moment for me.

Says you. What about Hinduism, which believes in multiple gods? They probably think themselves more enlightened than you. You're only placing your word against theirs.

There's a reason monkeys have human-like hands, skulls, and statures. There's a reason why they can communicate with sign-language: we are descended from the same organism.

[Johannes Kirkeholm]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

There's a reason monkeys have human-like hands, skulls, and statures. There's a reason why they can communicate with sign-language: we are descended from the same organism.

Evilution is such a far out hypothesis. I often have trouble seeing how people can believe in that instead of Intelligent Design. I guess I sometimes underestimate satans skill in deception. If intelligent Design wasn't a fact why would a banana fit in the human hand. Or a remote control?

Could a watch build itself? Could a watch be the product of random events when so much can go wrong during its creation? Could a human who is even more complicated than a watch be the product of utter randomness? This seems very unlikely. Moreover, if evilution was a fact why aren't monkeys still turning into people? I've been to the zoo once and the monkeys remained monkeys. And if Darwin was so good at evilution why did he die?

[Morgsara]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

Evilution is such a far out hypothesis. I often have trouble seeing how people can believe in that instead of Intelligent Design. I guess I sometimes underestimate satans skill in deception. If intelligent Design wasn't a fact why would a banana fit in the human hand. Or a remote control?

Could a watch build itself? Could a watch be the product of random events when so much can go wrong during its creation? Could a human who is even more complicated than a watch be the product of utter randomness? This seems very unlikely. Moreover, if evilution was a fact why aren't monkeys still turning into people? I've been to the zoo once and the monkeys remained monkeys. And if Darwin was so good at evilution why did he die?

Isn't the idea that a man can rise after being dead for three days a far out hypothesis? I have trouble seeing how people can believe that. Monkeys can hold bananas and remote controls too, I fail to see your point.

Evolution is the result of mutations of species. Monkeys don't wake up as another species, but new species are created often. And one cannot be "good at evolution." They can only understand evolution. We have no power over evolution, so Darwin could not have prevented his death by evolving into something else. Evolved species die. In a figurative interpretation of the Bible, Evolution does not reject the Bible. A monkey didn't materialize out of thin air, just like a watch couldn't. It evolved from simple organisms to fish to birds and the process continued until an ancestor to the monkey and human was created. Then two different species was the creation of two mutations.

[Johannes Kirkeholm]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

Isn't the idea that a man can rise after being dead for three days a far out hypothesis? I have trouble seeing how people can believe that. Monkeys can hold bananas and remote controls too, I fail to see your point.

If God says that Jesus rose from death than it must be true since He knows everything. Monkeys are also designed by God and that's why they can hold bananas.

Evolution is the result of mutations of species. Monkeys don't wake up as another species, but new species are created often. And one cannot be "good at evolution." They can only understand evolution. We have no power over evolution, so Darwin could not have prevented his death by evolving into something else.

Then why aren't new species being created today? I haven't heard of any new species originating in my life time and I am 20 years old. And if we had no power over evilution why does TV's keep getting better and better?

Evolved species die. In a figurative interpretation of the Bible, Evolution does not reject the Bible. A monkey didn't materialize out of thin air, just like a watch couldn't. It evolved from simple organisms to fish to birds and the process continued until an ancestor to the monkey and human was created. Then two different species was the creation of two mutations

As you have already been explained elsewhere all interpretation of the Bible is wrong. Evilution states that species evolve so that they can better survive, correct? Then why haven't any species evolved itself to be immortal? And why didn't Darwin do that? And why haven't birds evolved to become smart? After all a smart bird would be better at avoiding cats and people with shotguns. No, it is much more likely that birds were created stupid so that people with shotguns could kill them easily and thereby put food on the table.

[Morgsara]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

These are circular arguments. I've said that God's word cannot be taken from the Bible precisely because man wrote it. Man's not perfect, ergo the Bible's not perfect.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1540423420080815

You were eighteen.

Evolution works as long as there are imperfections. And humans are the only animals that can reason. Birds cannot, and they do avoid humans, but they cannot reason, and will not be able to evolve into reasoning creatures. A perfect creature will never be created through evolution.

[Cranky Old Man]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

These are circular arguments. I've said that God's word cannot be taken from the Bible precisely because man wrote it. Man's not perfect, ergo the Bible's not perfect.

And that's precicely how one can prove the Bible is perfect and God exists!

We humble people have limited capabilities. If you really read the entire KJV1611 Holy Bible you will notice it is so perfect, so extremely consistent, so crystal clear, that no ordinary person could ever have created it. So the sheer quality of the book proves that it is created by someone with capabilities far beyond that of a human being.

Since the Holy Bible clearly could not have been written by a mere mortal and also clearly states to be the word of God: 2nd Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness" logic dictates there can be only one conclusion. God exists and the Holy Bible is His word!

I think your problem is that you did not actually read the entire Holy Bible. Your opinion of the Holy Bible is based on hearsay. If you actually paid some attention during that education of yours instead of masturbating all the time you would have learned that you have to research the facts before you draw your conclusion. The facts here being the contents of the Holy Bible.

Well what is it going to be? Ignorance or enlightenment? Heaven or hell ?

[Gazza77]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

So inferior that:

In Exodus 1:17-21, Hebrew midwives were able to outsmart the Pharaoh and save the lives of Jewish newborn boys.

In Exodus 2, the birth mother of Moses was able to circumvent the Pharaoh's order to kill all of the baby boys, and to save her son.

Joshua 2:1-16 describes how Rahab, a prostitute, hid two Israelite spies and saved their lives by misdirecting some soldiers.

In Judges 4 and 5, Deborah is described as both a Judge of Israel and as the leader of the army.

In 1 Samuel 19:11-13, David's first wife, Michal, tricked soldiers and engineered David's escape.

And to me, this would suggest equality:

Exodus 21:15-17: A person who murdered or cursed either their father or mother would be executed.

Exodus 21:20-21: A slave owner who beat either his male or female slave so severely that he lived a few days without dying would not be punished.

Exodus 21:26: A slave owner who damages a tooth either of a male or female slave during a beating was required to let the slave go free.

Exodus 21:28-31: The owner of an ox who had injured a person would receive the same penalty, whether the victim was male or female.

Exodus 21:32: A slave owner would receive equal compensation if an ox gored one of his slaves, whether the victim was male or female.

[Levi Jones]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

No one is saying women are not important. It's only that they should be subservient to men.

Sorry, but it is indefensible that men and women are equal using the Bible.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

These are circular arguments. I've said that God's word cannot be taken from the Bible precisely because man wrote it. Man's not perfect, ergo the Bible's not perfect.

The Bible came from God, not man.

1st Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God which liveth and abideth forever.

2nd Timothy 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

2 Peter 1:21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

Habakkuk 2:2 And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1540423420080815
You were eighteen.

That was discovered, not a "new species". Anyway, it's still a robin, or do you consider labradoodles a "new species" as well?

Evolution works as long as there are imperfections. And humans are the only animals that can reason. Birds cannot, and they do avoid humans, but they cannot reason, and will not be able to evolve into reasoning creatures. A perfect creature will never be created through evolution.

Animals can't reason? Birds are quite capable of reasoning or else how does a hawk decide when the perfect time to strike is? How does a dog decide that a fence is too high to jump so I'll take the short route around? How does a protection dog decide who is friend or foe? How does a bird dog know to adjust his hunting style for the situation? Anyway, isn't you're argument really disproving evolution? After billions of years you think evolution would have gotten it right.

[Seth Campbell]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.



Why are women so stupid that they can't see that this is the MEN'S ONLY SECTION!

[James Dewitt]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

Why are women so stupid that they can't see that this is the MEN'S ONLY SECTION!

You tell me Seth, she is YOUR WIFE and she is your responsibility! Don't you remember where the wood shed is?

[James Hutchins]

Re: Further proof that women are inferior.

It is not the first time I have seen her post here either. I will say, there has been some high level chatter about it at the Landover Mens Club.

[Larson_is_wrong]

Wow you're all going to hell...

You know that Woman are actually the very foundation of life in this world. If ANY woman were to read this. O and they will, I gurantee they would try and murder you. You all deserve to rot in hell. Scratch that. you deserve to be slaves to a reaaallllly sexist woman for what you think. I give props to The one person in here that actually stood up for his beiliefs. Sexism is wrong. You'll know it when you get fucked in the afterlife.