Re: BAN DIABLO 3: The most SATANIC, SEX-POSITIVE game EVER!
Community Activists Twice LMAO
Computer Gamers = well then bobby joe god hates you and your multi player first person shooters you talk about playing
Union Members lol these are mainly republicans
Furries OMG bobby you even knowing about this shows what depravity you are into Pornographers is fury
The Unemployed lol i bet you have been alot or are you union!
Government Regulators beurocratic republicans hello contradict you guys said god loves republicans lol
Model Rail Roaders I just have no idea why this is here?
HUTCHINS v. THE STATE.
A99A2355.
(243 Ga. App. 261)
(533 SE2d 107)
(2000)
MILLER, Judge.
Probation; "good-time" credit. Lowndes State Court. Before Judge Turner.
Having pled guilty to driving under the influence, James Hutchins was sentenced to 12 months in the county jail, "[p]rovided, that after the service of 180 days in confinement, the balance shall be probated." The sheriff awarded him 60 days credit for good time and released him following 120 days confinement. After serving probation for 185 days, Hutchins moved to have his sentence terminated,, which the court denied on the ground that the 60 days of "good-time credit had to be served on probation. The question on appeal is whether a sentence which orders a defendant to serve part of the sentence in jail with the balance probated can require that "good-time" credit resulting in an early release from confinement be served on probation. We hold it cannot and reverse.
HUTCHINS v. THE STATE.
A99A2355.
(243 Ga. App. 261)
(533 SE2d 107)
(2000)
MILLER, Judge.
Probation; "good-time" credit. Lowndes State Court. Before Judge Turner.
Having pled guilty to driving under the influence, James Hutchins was sentenced to 12 months in the county jail, "[p]rovided, that after the service of 180 days in confinement, the balance shall be probated." The sheriff awarded him 60 days credit for good time and released him following 120 days confinement. After serving probation for 185 days, Hutchins moved to have his sentence terminated,, which the court denied on the ground that the 60 days of "good-time credit had to be served on probation. The question on appeal is whether a sentence which orders a defendant to serve part of the sentence in jail with the balance probated can require that "good-time" credit resulting in an early release from confinement be served on probation. We hold it cannot and reverse.
Originally posted by Bobby-Joe
View Post
Computer Gamers = well then bobby joe god hates you and your multi player first person shooters you talk about playing
Union Members lol these are mainly republicans
Furries OMG bobby you even knowing about this shows what depravity you are into Pornographers is fury
The Unemployed lol i bet you have been alot or are you union!
Government Regulators beurocratic republicans hello contradict you guys said god loves republicans lol
Model Rail Roaders I just have no idea why this is here?
HUTCHINS v. THE STATE.
A99A2355.
(243 Ga. App. 261)
(533 SE2d 107)
(2000)
MILLER, Judge.
Probation; "good-time" credit. Lowndes State Court. Before Judge Turner.
Having pled guilty to driving under the influence, James Hutchins was sentenced to 12 months in the county jail, "[p]rovided, that after the service of 180 days in confinement, the balance shall be probated." The sheriff awarded him 60 days credit for good time and released him following 120 days confinement. After serving probation for 185 days, Hutchins moved to have his sentence terminated,, which the court denied on the ground that the 60 days of "good-time credit had to be served on probation. The question on appeal is whether a sentence which orders a defendant to serve part of the sentence in jail with the balance probated can require that "good-time" credit resulting in an early release from confinement be served on probation. We hold it cannot and reverse.
HUTCHINS v. THE STATE.
A99A2355.
(243 Ga. App. 261)
(533 SE2d 107)
(2000)
MILLER, Judge.
Probation; "good-time" credit. Lowndes State Court. Before Judge Turner.
Having pled guilty to driving under the influence, James Hutchins was sentenced to 12 months in the county jail, "[p]rovided, that after the service of 180 days in confinement, the balance shall be probated." The sheriff awarded him 60 days credit for good time and released him following 120 days confinement. After serving probation for 185 days, Hutchins moved to have his sentence terminated,, which the court denied on the ground that the 60 days of "good-time credit had to be served on probation. The question on appeal is whether a sentence which orders a defendant to serve part of the sentence in jail with the balance probated can require that "good-time" credit resulting in an early release from confinement be served on probation. We hold it cannot and reverse.
Comment