In India, a Homer Prince Invites Other Homers to the Palace

[Johny Joe Hold]

When I read this, I wanted to call up President Trump and thank him for stopping most foreign trade. Especially, I don't want goods from India here nor do I want anything from our Christian nation going to Homer Hinduland.

This girly man, a member of the royal family, is making a joke of India's long standing hatred of homers. Let's make sure what happens in India stays in India.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-india-lgbt-royals/gay-indian-prince-throws-open-palace-doors-to-vulnerable-lgbt-people-idUSKBN1EZ1U3

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: In India, a Homer Prince Invites Other Homers to the Palace

It is that sort of report that makes newspapers such shocking publications - there should be some sort of Christian oversight of what is published, if only to protect women, children and the vulnerable.

This "prince" (I suspect that everyone in India calls themselves "prince" or "princess") not only is flaunting his own sin but is encouraging others to flaunt theirs also.

It would be one thing to have a sort of zoo in which paying members of the public could safely view examples of abominations presented to them in an educational, improving, and Christian atmosphere, so as to be able, easily, to recognize transgressions, but it is quite another when something superficially attractive - a visit to a palace - is handed to these perverts just because they are degenerates. It not only acknowledges these abnormalities, it gives them some sort of status and, among the feeble-minded, probably some "legitimacy".

Of course, they all probably gather together in dens of iniquity anyway, and, other than by way of police raids, they receive no publicity. However, once a "prince" steps onto the stage the innocent may become persuaded that the LBGT-lifestyle is somehow "acceptable"... and it simply is not.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Re: In India, a Homer Prince Invites Other Homers to the Palace

It would be one thing to have a sort of zoo in which paying members of the public could safely view examples of abominations presented to them in an educational, improving, and Christian atmosphere, so as to be able, easily, to recognize transgressions

That's great idea, Pastor. We have the Noah's Ark theme park. How about a sin theme park? People could file through and see the various sins first hand with, of course, proper instructions from the Bible on why these send those who are on display to hell.

The park could also include graphic suffering, people with severe burns could be views and also illustrations of those who downed during Noah's flood.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: In India, a Homer Prince Invites Other Homers to the Palace

Royalty, prince and princesses - in India? Last I heard they claimed to be the "world's largest democracy" - cows and all. These people need to be put to work instead of sitting around watching Bollywood movies and indulging their rectums.

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: In India, a Homer Prince Invites Other Homers to the Palace

This is something they will export along with their cacophonous films and stone age religions. Nowhere is safe, and they expect to be fully funded.

KORAN 4..an-Nisa' . look up .. Pickthall
163 Lo! We inspire thee as We inspired Noah and the prophets after him, as We inspired Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes, and Jesus and Job and Jonah and Aaron and Solomon, and as We imparted unto David the Psalms;
164 And messengers We have mentioned unto thee before and messengers We have not mentioned unto thee; and Allah spake directly unto Moses;
165 Messengers of good cheer and of warning, in order that mankind might have no argument against Allah after the messengers. Allah was ever Mighty, Wise.

They claim Moses as a prophet. They claim Moses had a direct line to Allah. What did Moses have to say on this subject? Let's have a look:

MOSES . look up . KJV
LEVITICUS 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.
24 Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you.

Pretty watertight. But Moses did not stop there. What should be done with these abominations? Special boulevards where they could prance around in skin tight sequinned hot-pants? Free feathered wings in pastel shades with patent leather buckles across the chest? Evidently not.

LEVITICUS 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Now I hope I don't seem an unreasonable person. No-one has to believe either of those sources. Some people even claim Moses never existed at all. Others say Mohammed was a crazy man and plenty may be found who are disgusted with the religion altogether. Maniacs like Lawrence Krauss or Richard Dawkins go completely ape over quantum-cause-and-effect with Darwinistic evolution thrown in for good measure, all of it contradicted by The Bible just as sexual diversity is very explicitly CONDEMNED and capital punishment COMMANDED.

India is lousy with false religions, they'll worship just about anything. Islam was partitioned off at one point but there's no shortage of them remaining and available for export. Some of them decide that following a madman back to the stone-age is subpar and reject the tenets of Islam. Whether they are right to do so is a matter for them. Others hear missionaries and decide to abandon religion altogether, essentially on the very dubious grounds that they can't all be right. There may be a specific doctrine, such as that you need to be murdered, which offends them and that would seem a pretty good reason to apostatise. But what do they actually do? In the case of homosex as our Pastor for Diversity and Tolerance has surmised, they agglomerate, seeking fully funded sodomy hives paid for by the host community.

Nur Warsame said he is dealing with an "avalanche of misery" among LGBTI Muslims who have no support services or safe spaces.…."You are talking about an ideology that believes your repentance is to be killed as a gay person," he said.…."One of the most essential things that our young people need is safe, affordable housing. For young people to transition safely they cannot be in the environment that is causing them the trauma," he said.

"I had seven people housed at my one-bedroom apartment.….Imam Nur is currently in talks with philanthropists in a bid to secure a building [which] he would like to move into [with] a roof shaped "like the dome of a mosque."

"Inside, that circle thing looks like a mihrab, which is where the Imam stands to pray," he said. "It is central, it is very close to a lot of the services I recommend.….a medical centre for LGBT people, the hospital is just up the road, the police station is also down the road."

Lovely. And why do these people need protecting? BECAUSE OF THE VERY RELIGION THEY EXPECT TO HAVE SERVED UP TO THEM ON A PLATE WITH PARSLEY ALL AROUND AND CAVIAR LAVISHLY SPRINKLED. This is what passes for "thinking" in India and across other sub-continents and probably the main reason for their third world status. But it doesn't stop there! My mouth gaped as I read:

More Imams are coming out as gay and preaching that homosexuality isn't condemned in Islam. They're part of a global push for a more liberal interpretation of the Koran that acknowledges diversity and empowers mosques to welcome sexual minorities.

Damir Ahmetovic prays five times a day and describes himself as a devout Muslim.…."The wider Muslim community is not aware that I am gay and I keep away from them," Mr Ahmetovic said. "I've made a choice to limit my contact with them. It's a self protection mechanism, I don't want judgment, hostility and negative responses to who I am.".….Mr Ahmetovic said he knows "quite a few" gay Muslims.….but says they have rejected their faith since coming out. He also knows many more who identify as both gay and Muslim who are looking for a mosque that will include, not shun them.

Am I mad or something? They spout off about Moses and I have posted a passage from their holy book to show that. They say they follow prophets (whether I think they're prophets is immaterial) and we know what those prophets say. Moses relays a COMMANDMENT from God that homosexuals should be killed. There is much more material but that's enough. What we're talking about here is the equivalent of a Roman Catholic who thinks Jesus never existed, Paul was a Zoroastrian and the pope should be shot. But they're still a devout catholic. A communist cell thinking Marx was on magic mushrooms, that all fiscal revenue needs to be transferred into Swiss bank accounts of factory owners and the Tsar is God. Yet remain revolutionary socialists. What is it I'm not getting here? Muslims who reject fundamental tenets of Allah as revealed through people whom they claim to be prophets, even having direct access to the source of their imagined wisdom as it must be because they disagree with it yet still call themselves devout? Even though their dogma says they should be murdered and murderers are actually looking for them to actually murder them? And still they follow this stuff devoutly? Therefore, they say, we.—.not they.—.better fork out some moolah for a sodomy hive. We, who have a culture deriving rather specifically from rejecting the tenets of Mohammed across centuries even before we were colonies in many cases. A society infinitely more appealing TO THEM than the hell holes their creed must necessarily create. Christians do not follow the teachings of Mohammed and how many Christians are climbing over one another like marauding wildebeest to get into any Islamic stronghold? Look at Burma. They used to have a Muslim problem. Not any more. They've all gone to what FOR THEM must be a paradise. No heathens to pollute their eyes, no big fat idols or Christian Churches to offend them. But now they have the opportunity to live what they preach, do they blither?

Yes.

They can't get out quick enough, but nobody wants them. These homer congregations as from India are repeated all over the world and as they blither regardless of religious devoutness or the tenets they repudiate what goes on inside will still be an abomination for anyone who has The Truth which is written down for us in The Bible so that we will know. You don't have to believe it but if you don't can you call yourself a Christian? And if you don't believe the Koran, why call yourself a Muslim? And if you're not a Muslim, why should we buy you a mosque? With that degree of irrationality we'd soon end up like India ourselves.