[Freethinker]

Re: Freethinker Hates LBC

Earth is not spherical, you deluded fool. Besides the many Bible passages that prove you wrong, the Earth's gravitational field cannot be modelled as a perfect sphere, but you wouldn't know that, you're too busy being sel-righteous and coming to troll this Godly™ forum.

The earth isn't a perfect sphere. It is slightly fatter at the equator.

http://www.kralidis.ca/gis/maproj/earthdims.htm

You really truly believe that the earth is flat???

You have to be kidding. Please tell me that this is a spoof sight.

Are there really people in the US who believe that the earth is flat?

[Dr. Santiago Solo]

Re: Freethinker Hates LBC

The earth isn't a perfect sphere. It is slightly fatter at the equator.

http://www.kralidis.ca/gis/maproj/earthdims.htm

You really truly believe that the earth is flat???

You have to be kidding. Please tell me that this is a spoof sight.

Are there really people in the US who believe that the earth is flat?

Well, you have these guys, but they could use a bit more Biblical references in their approach, but you'll see their evidence is quite solid:

http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm

I praise them, of course, for their valuable use of thermodynamics and the difficulty of maintaining a functional Earth-bound atmosphere and ocean as to why Earth is as flat as the Bible says:

1) The fluid problem
Water. Regardless of which train of thought you follow, it covers over seventy-five percent of our planet's surface. And the atmosphere, also a fluid, covers the entire surface. The difference is why. While flat-Earthers know that the ocean is really just a large bowl, (with great sheets of ice around the edges to hold the ocean back), and the atmosphere is contained by a large dome, the backwards "round-Earth" way of thinking would have you believe that all those trillions of gallons of water and air just "stick" to the planet's surface.
Conventional thinking would suggest that the water would just run down the sides of the Earth (to use the analogy again, like droplets running down the sides of a beach ball) and fall into outer space, while the air would dissipate. Using the earlier mentioned idea of "gravitational charge" gives some credibility to the theory. If the fluids were static, then exposure to the gravitational field for a long enough period of time would allow their molecules to align themselves with and be pulled in by the field.
But fluids are not static, especially not in the atmosphere and oceans. Great ocean currents run both at the surface and deep below, carrying water across huge basins, keeping the solution far from stagnant. Jet streams of air travel at hundreds of miles per hour through the atmosphere. And windblown rainclouds carry vast quantities of evaporated seawater across miles of ground, releasing their load far from its starting point. Water or air that (according to "round-Earth" theory) starts on one side of the planet could end up completely on the other side in a matter of only a few days. With all this turbulence and motion, if the world were round, the oceans should all fall "down" into the sky, leaving the planet dry and barren, and the atmosphere would simply float away. Why, just look at the moon. It is round, like a ball, and yet it has no atmosphere at all.
2) Thermodynamic complications
Taking into account the "gravitational charge" analogy once more, and assuming that for some reason the atmosphere was able to align itself with the new direction of the theoretical "gravitational field", we are faced with a new problem involving another branch of physics known as thermodynamics.
Obviously, the world is static, the fixed center of the Universe. The sun, planets and stars all revolve around it (although not necessarily in circular paths), in a plane level with the flat Earth.

Definitely, God bless the US of A, no other Western country would have developed such a marvelous piece of work as this one, Amen and A-men.

[Freethinker]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

You are all completely nuts.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

You are all completely nuts.

How can you understand? You can’t - the cracked pitcher should not come to the well.



You accuse us of being “nuts” but you have made no attempt to learn God’s Word. You readily accept all this secular science rubbish because you have been indoctrinated since birth to accept it.



Here comes God’s Word lighting the path to Salvation and Eternal life, and it has created a conflict in your mind. This conflict questions your life up to now; it is uncomfortable and, in your fear and ignorance, you lash out with invective.

What you need is the still small voice of clam that is the Baby Jesus.

[Sledge Riprock]

Re: Freethinker Hates LBC

The earth isn't a perfect sphere. It is slightly fatter at the equator.

It sounds like your brain is slightly fatter at the equator, God Mocker!

[Freethinker]

Re: Freethinker Hates LBC

It sounds like your brain is slightly fatter at the equator, God Mocker!

Wow Shleprock you sure burned me.

Yuk Yuk Yuk

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

I did respond. Before he even posted it.

Muslims can be Americans although I dislike them as much as any other religeous group.

No you did not respond. The issue was your flip-flopping. You correctly said Mooslims aren't Americans, then when you saw your mistake in being right for once, you back-peddled and changed your story so as not to anger Satan. I can't think of any other reason for you to have changed your mind so quickly.

[Sledge Riprock]

Re: Freethinker Hates LBC

Wow Shleprock you sure burned me.

You're the one whose going to Burn, Stargazer!

Isaiah 47:13-15

13 Thou art wearied in the multitude of thy counsels. Let now the astrologers, the stargazers, the monthly prognosticators, stand up, and save thee from these things that shall come upon thee.

14 Behold, they shall be as stubble; the fire shall burn them; they shall not deliver themselves from the power of the flame: there shall not be a coal to warm at, nor fire to sit before it.

15 Thus shall they be unto thee with whom thou hast laboured, even thy merchants, from thy youth: they shall wander every one to his quarter; none shall save thee.

[Freethinker]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

No you did not respond. The issue was your flip-flopping. You correctly said Mooslims aren't Americans, then when you saw your mistake in being right for once, you back-peddled and changed your story so as not to anger Satan. I can't think of any other reason for you to have changed your mind so quickly.

No he called me a mooselimb and by the tone of this forum I'm sure he was referring to terrorist type when he said it.

I said I was an American not a Muslim. What I meant to say is that I was born an american. My family ancestors have been here for almost all of the US's history.

BTW I do nothing for Satan as he is an imaginary character Christians borrowed from other religions. It is funny that you lot are so intolerant and ignorant of other religions and call them all Satan worshippers when almost all of them do not even believe Satan exists let alone worship that imaginary character.

Muslims and peoples of all other faiths and nationalities are welcome to come to America and become Americans.

[JennyD]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

No he called me a mooselimb and by the tone of this forum I'm sure he was referring to terrorist type when he said it.

I said I was an American not a Muslim. What I meant to say is that I was born an american. My family ancestors have been here for almost all of the US's history.

. . .

Muslims and peoples of all other faiths and nationalities are welcome to come to America and become Americans.

So what you're saying is, no natural-born American could be a Muslim, because America is a Christian nation. Right?

So O'Sambo cannot possibly be an American!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

[...]BTW I do nothing for Satan as he is an imaginary character Christians borrowed from other religions.[...]

Just how were there any "other religions" before the Earth was created?
Is not Satan mentioned in
1Ch:21:1: And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.
and in
Job:1:6: Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.
Job:1:7: And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
Job:1:8: And the LORD said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil?

[Freethinker]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

Just how were there any "other religions" before the Earth was created?

The earth is billions of years old not 6,000.

Hinduism is older than Judasim and both predate Christianity.
Various forms of Paganism are much older than that.

Have you studied any other religions or just the bible?

[JennyD]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

The earth is billions of years old not 6,000.

Could you prove that, please?

Chapter and verse. Thanks!

Hinduism is older than Judasim and both predate Christianity.
Various forms of Paganism are much older than that.

What proof do you have of these things?

Christianity has been around for 2,000 years. Judaism for 4,000 years before that. Adam and Eve were the first people, and the first Jews.

Prove that your Hinduism (never mentioned in the Bible, for some odd reason) existed before God made the world.

Thanks!

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

No he called me a mooselimb and by the tone of this forum I'm sure he was referring to terrorist type when he said it.

Sister Jenny brought up the other point I wanted to make, but didn't cover this strange statement. Are you implying that there are Mooslims who aren't terrorists?

[logician]

Re: "Free"thinker Hates LBC

The age of our planet is irrelevant. Did god create a baby or a man? If the earth were created by God, then he created it to be a full grown earth. IF. The bible has many truths in it, and is all truth, for it exists. It is created as we are created, and creation is the founding point for all existence. Its hard to dance around this one until people pull their head out of their arse, but ill go ahead and say it anyway. This will be way over your bounds of reasoning, but here it goes. Multiple dimensionalism. There are levels of exsistence beyond merely our physical universe.

This is proven by nuclear physics: there are 4 parts to an atom: the electron (protons, neutrons) the graviton, the weak nucleus and the strong nucleus. Creating one singular nuclei. When the four parts are split, all the above can be physically traced with the exception of the graviton. Upon losing track of the graviton, they made a mathematical formula to trace the graviton: to their surprise, they found that the graviton transcends this form of existence and attaches itself to the next dimension. After doing the problem several times over, it became conclusive that there are multiple dimensions.

So is the world a sphere? Absolutely. Is it flat? Most certainly! The 2nd dimension is the round flat blueprint that the third dimension of matter and form replicates in actual shape! So your both right, but on different pages. Both of you are thinking on physical terms, in which case freethinker is right. But as for the earth is flat man, he is right in a way he doesn’t understand himself. Hes thinking physical therefore he is wrong, but the concept of earth being flat is only true in alternative dimensions that we are a byproduct of.