[Jo Freddie]

Re: Introductions are in order!

RomanK asked the question as to what people thought about it signature. So I told him. THAT is not derailing the thread when I responded to a question asked BY THE OP writer!

Then I sought clarification of the point you were making, if you had made it clearly in the first place I would not have felt it necessary to post my responses, so you see it it still down to you that I have been posting in this topic.

Now you are derailing this topic with your groundless allegations that I am derailing this topic.

[Seth Campbell]

Re: Introductions are in order!

RomanK asked the question as to what people thought about it signature. So I told him. THAT is not derailing the thread when I responded to a question asked BY THE OP writer!

sheesh you are difficult.

Why aren't you at a pastafarian forum or do you get tired of arguing with yourself over there?

YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

I have a suspicion that he's been banned from the pastafarian forum for telling them what their book really means and for derailing every thread over there.

[RomanK]

Re: Introductions are in order!

The only virgin birth is in the development of the Almond, which is repreesented within the Vesica Piscis. Which Jesus is often depicted as being a part of.

Besides most couldn't even figure out if Jesus was John or not, much less Immanuel. And for the record saying that one will e born and be called Immanuel is different from being born and actually being called Immanuel. Give a piece of scripture where I he is and I I might actually admit to being wrong.

And yes there is scripture quoated in this article. http://symboldictionary.net/?p=1127

[Phebe Carlyle]

Re: Introductions are in order!

The only virgin birth is in the development of the Almond, which is repreesented within the Vesica Piscis. Which Jesus is often depicted as being a part of.

Besides most couldn't even figure out if Jesus was John or not, much less Immanuel. And for the record saying that one will e born and be called Immanuel is different from being born and actually being called Immanuel. Give a piece of scripture where I he is and I I might actually admit to being wrong.

And yes there is scripture quoated in this article. http://symboldictionary.net/?p=1127

What is it with you and your spirograph and etcha-sketch nonsense?

Do you enjoy looking at doodles because you cannot comprehend the written word OF GOD?



YIC

Mrs Phebe Dewitt.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Introductions are in order!

And yes there is scripture quoated in this article. http://symboldictionary.net/?p=1127

One of the wonders of the human mind is its ability to see patterns. Unfortunately, this often misfires, making one see patterns and connections that are not really there (think optical illusions, Jesus/Mary on toast or Marmite lids, etc.). That website has very little accurate information, which when added to a plethora of bafflegab, could lead some to believe that the simple intersection of two circles, along with the fact that the initial letters of five semi-random Greek words combine to spell "fish", somehow proves the existence of the divine.

Oh, and further down the page, among the "Related Symbols", lies this little gem:



So goatse is now an ancient symbol of the divine to you? That's one altar I'll not be worshipping at, tyvm.

[RomanK]

Re: Introductions are in order!

These symbols are based on Math and nothing in the bible will ever prove that 1+1 doesn't =2. It's real nice how you guys say that an article has very little to do with with reality when you have no other explanation. At least not one that is openly admitted as to being a metaphore, a parable, an analogy or someother description that doesn't paint an accurate picture. Yet it's god word eventhou you have no basis for why it is even written in such a way. It's like a rumor passed around in class. By the time it reaches the last child, pizza in the school cafeteria becomes a field trip to a caviar plant.

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Introductions are in order!

These symbols are based on Math and nothing in the bible will ever prove that 1+1 doesn't =2. It's real nice how you guys say that an article has very little to do with with reality when you have no other explanation. At least not one that is openly admitted as to being a metaphore, a parable, an analogy or someother description that doesn't paint an accurate picture. Yet it's god word eventhou you have no basis for why it is even written in such a way. It's like a rumor passed around in class. By the time it reaches the last child, pizza in the school cafeteria becomes a field trip to a caviar plant.

I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about. We're the ones who are faithful to words that were written down 2,000+ years ago. You're the one trying to preach new age mumbo-jumbo with Jesus' name attached to it.

[RomanK]

Re: Introductions are in order!

as far as I am concerned faith is just a self reflection of one's own vanity. And as far as I am concerned their all dumber than a bag of hammers.

http://www.666blacksun.com/Bible_Conspiracy.html know your enemy

[Seth Campbell]

Re: Introductions are in order!

as far as I am concerned faith is just a self reflection of one's own vanity. And as far as I am concerned their all dumber than a bag of hammers.

http://www.666blacksun.com/Bible_Conspiracy.html know your enemy

Ah, so your a demon infested atheist, why am I not surprised.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Introductions are in order!

as far as I am concerned faith is just a self reflection of one's own vanity. And as far as I am concerned their all dumber than a bag of hammers.

http://www.666blacksun.com/Bible_Conspiracy.html know your enemy

Now, let's see where that page is located. JoyofSatan.org! Oh, my, what a surprise (not). He's another hypocritical Satanist. So let's have a look at some of their beliefs:

The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth

1. Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.
2. Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.
3. When in another’s home, show them respect or else do not go there.

The Nine Satanic Sins

1. Stupidity
   
2. Pretentiousness
3. Solipsism
4. Self-deceit
5. Herd Conformity
6. Lack of Perspective
7. Forgetfulness of Past Orthodoxies
8. Counterproductive Pride
9. Lack of Aesthetics

Guilty of at least six, I'd say. (info from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Church_of_Satan )

[Seth Campbell]

Re: Introductions are in order!

Now, let's see where that page is located. JoyofSatan.org! Oh, my, what a surprise (not). He's another hypocritical Satanist. So let's have a look at some of their beliefs:

The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth

1. Do not give opinions or advice unless you are asked.
2. Do not tell your troubles to others unless you are sure they want to hear them.
3. When in another’s home, show them respect or else do not go there.

The Nine Satanic Sins

1. Stupidity
   
2. Pretentiousness
3. Solipsism
4. Self-deceit
5. Herd Conformity
6. Lack of Perspective
7. Forgetfulness of Past Orthodoxies
8. Counterproductive Pride
9. Lack of Aesthetics

Guilty of at least six, I'd say. (info from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Church_of_Satan )

So do bad Satanists go to heaven? I'm really wondering what they think a decent punishment would be.