Re: Hello From An Unrepentant Unitarian
Because the issue wasn’t why God killed Saul, it was merely whether Saul inquired of God. If you’re suggesting now that these two passages referred to two separate events, they why did you say the exact opposite in your original response?
Not likely.
Finally, somebody in here admits that what you feel is relevant to your choice of religion. Thanks, Justin.
Funny you should mention that, I read a paper several years ago discussing the evolutionary biology of the copepods. I don’t see [sorry, bad pun] how your parable of the shark in any way informs a theological discussion, however, so I’m not going to follow up on this line of discussion further.
Half of this thread seems to be tied in knots about how I don’t discuss UU, and now you’re criticizing my description of it. You True Christian types really ought at least to get your stories straight.
Are you saying that you don’t want sweet adult Jesus to answer your prayer?
And yet, here you are discussing with me. I agree, if you don't have anything substantive to say, there's no point in your wasting your time in this thread.
What are you talking about? I never said that any verses from the Bible came from anywhere other than their true source. If you True Christians are so unfamiliar with the Bible that you don’t know what it says, please don’t blame me.
I’ll try to level some more adult insults in the future
a Landover staple
So far he’s the only person in here who’s actually been able to anticipate my arguments and respond with any depth of knowledge rather than with slogans and insults. You’re right, he has done it without your assistance. And, he's not a gay black Jew like Joshua.
Maybe I’m really a True Christian in disguise.
I agree that the Bible prohibits these things. I just don’t believe that the Bible is the sole source for what constitutes a good, Christian life.
I believe in a creator. Call it God if you will, I certainly do. I believe that Jesus lived, and was the greatest moral philosopher and teacher ever to take breath. That doesn’t mean that the Bible, and your particular take on it, are the literal truth. Perhaps I’ve fallen into too many Heretic Traps.
If you think that I and other UU’s are damned, perhaps you need to re-read Romans 9:15-16: For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
What you think doesn’t count. What I think doesn’t count. What my congregation thinks doesn’t count. The only thing that counts is what God chooses to do. At least, that's what the Bible says.
I believe in a creator, and I believe that Jesus was the greatest moral teacher in history, which is why I call myself a Christian. Since I do not have unquestionable views on anything, I suppose you could call me an agnostic. I don't see how the athiest label would apply to me. SAB is useful sometimes, but it is hit or miss. Real pros, which I am, use Strong's Concordance.
The great thing about Jesus is that he comes to us.
Funny, I don’t think you’re much like those two at all.
Easily done, though I doubt I can remove enough though from my analysis to please you, Brother Cletus. The last 12 verses of Mark 16 were added to the Gospels long after the rest of the book had been written, so in no way can be considered canonical except by someone who (a) is both completely illiterate in Greek and unaware of the earlier manuscripts, in which these 12 verses are missing or (b) has subordinated accuracy to the desire to support particular view. See Bart Ehrman’s Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why.
As for Revelation, they did have hashish back then, and whoever wrote the book (it clearly wasn’t written by the same person who wrote the Gospel of John) had obviously been smoking it. Nevertheless, I agree on the whole that how you live your life is more important than what you believe or how often you bathe when it comes to salvation.
Anyway, I see no reason to believe that the opinion of either “Mark” or “John” is more (or less) valuable than anyone else’s.
==============
I thought the sermon went especially well yesterday. Many of my parishioners were shocked by what I told them you guys claim to believe, but cautioned them that, before rejecting everything in your view out of hand, they should consider what is relevant to their lives and their spirituality. On the whole, the response mirrored what most of us think about the Bible—it’s a flawed document, but we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the baptismal water.
The congregation felt that I should offer an explanation of Unitarian Universalism to you, so I will work on that. One thing that I need to get straight first, however, is whether Heretic Traps is official doctrine of Landover Baptist or just a speculation by some members (it’s actually a lot easier to explain what we believe and why to someone who accepts the notion of Heretic Traps). Would anyone who disagrees with the Heretic Traps doctrine please let me know?
Originally posted by SalvationSeeker
View Post
I suggest you stop trolling…
Originally posted by Justin Bill
View Post
Originally posted by One-eyed Jack
View Post
Your description of Unitarian Unicyclism
Sweet Baby Jesus
Originally posted by JennyD
View Post
the majority of your discourse consists of deceit (pretending verses of Scripture came from Hindus)
childish insults
"witty" sarcasm
Pastor Billy-Reuben is doing quite well at tromping your supposed Biblical knowledge without my assistance
I am not convinced that you are anything but a troll
If you had the Biblical knowledge you claim, surely you would know that the many practices engaged in by your UU fellows -- astrology, witchcraft, pagan idolatry, etc. -- are all forbidden by God and abominations in His eyes.
If you believed in God and Jesus, as you claim to do, then you would know that these abominations are, in God's view (the only view which matters), grounds for an eternity of damnation….If you were a minister, as you claim to be, you would have as your goal ensuring the Salvation, not Damnation, of your congregation.
If you think that I and other UU’s are damned, perhaps you need to re-read Romans 9:15-16: For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
What you think doesn’t count. What I think doesn’t count. What my congregation thinks doesn’t count. The only thing that counts is what God chooses to do. At least, that's what the Bible says.
The fact that you are claiming to preach anything other than Christianity in spite of your supposed Biblical knowledge leads me to believe that you (a) have gained most of your Biblical knowledge through the Skeptic's Annotated Bible; (b) do not believe in God and Jesus, but are in fact an atheist or agnostic; and (c) are not a minister of any congregation.
I do hope that you come to Jesus some day!
Originally posted by One-eyed Jack
View Post
Originally posted by Brother Cletus
As for Revelation, they did have hashish back then, and whoever wrote the book (it clearly wasn’t written by the same person who wrote the Gospel of John) had obviously been smoking it. Nevertheless, I agree on the whole that how you live your life is more important than what you believe or how often you bathe when it comes to salvation.
Anyway, I see no reason to believe that the opinion of either “Mark” or “John” is more (or less) valuable than anyone else’s.
==============
I thought the sermon went especially well yesterday. Many of my parishioners were shocked by what I told them you guys claim to believe, but cautioned them that, before rejecting everything in your view out of hand, they should consider what is relevant to their lives and their spirituality. On the whole, the response mirrored what most of us think about the Bible—it’s a flawed document, but we shouldn’t throw the baby out with the baptismal water.
The congregation felt that I should offer an explanation of Unitarian Universalism to you, so I will work on that. One thing that I need to get straight first, however, is whether Heretic Traps is official doctrine of Landover Baptist or just a speculation by some members (it’s actually a lot easier to explain what we believe and why to someone who accepts the notion of Heretic Traps). Would anyone who disagrees with the Heretic Traps doctrine please let me know?







Comment