[MaroneyBaloney]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Oh I understand fully there's bias, but I like to give the benefit of the doubt.

[Harsha Shah]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Oh I understand fully there's bias, but I like to give the benefit of the doubt.

Yes! Hello, friend. I am also new in this Forum. You are asking important questions and you are blessed in your polite manner. You are trying to find the truth, yes? I am personally willing to accept many truths. I am trying to say yes to them all, perhaps it is crazy, to accept all as truths even when contradictory. It is different from logic, yes? I hope this place will help us get answers.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

I'm Maroney00, and if you haven't seem my other posts and determined for yourself, I'm not much of a religious type. What I'm looking for in this forum is to defend others like myself who may have misstated their points, or simply were not well-spoken enough to defend their fair notions on these sometimes brutal discussion boards (when deserving of help). In addition, I also look to have my conceptions regarding the Christian doctrine fairly and logically challenged by the more educated individuals of this community to be effectively enlightened. I hope for good, friendly discussion in the future.

First of all, this is NOT a debate forum. We're right and you're wrong, according to Jesus and the Holy Word of God. Please read THIS thread before making an even bigger fool of yourself.

Secondly, while the internets might seem to be "free" to you, this particular corner of the internets is a privately owned Christian forum. The rights you have on this forum are listed HERE. Please contact a Pastor immediately if you feel that any of your rights have been violated.

Finally, your unsaved opinions or tantrums are not even slightly of interest to us. We follow the Holy Word of God TO THE LETTER, and make no apologies for that. One of the most important commandments in the Bible tells us to avoid unsaved scum such as yourself. You wandered in here uninvited, and unwelcome .

If you want to debate people, THIS is the place to go.

[Des]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Perhaps our God denying visitor hasn't went full on atheist yet, so isn't feeling Satan's pull toward buggery and retardation. He may only be at the gaytard enabling level of denial where he makes silly claims about gays and retards being natural and deserving of rights.

[Des]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Mercy me, but I don't recollect calling you a name.

As for what God thinks of retards, read Leviticus 21 for goodness sake!

[MaroneyBaloney]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

I'm guessing kum ba yah isn't on your most listened list.

[Des]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

I'm guessing kum ba yah isn't on your most listened list.

Certainly not. I don't speak Ebola.

[MaroneyBaloney]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Nor do you speak like a decent human being, apparently. In all my travels, I can't say I've ever run into someone who spoke Ebola.

[Des]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Nor do you speak like a decent human being, apparently. In all my travels, I can't say I've ever run into someone who spoke Ebola.

Walk around Ferguson, Missouri tonight. All you'll hear is Ebolic gibbering among the looters.

[MaroneyBaloney]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Are you familiar with Ebola?

[Des]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

Are you familiar with Ebola?

Do I look like a Wigger to you?

[Witch Hammer]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

. In all my travels, I can't say I've ever run into someone who spoke Ebola.

Don't get your plaid miniskirt in a bind, haggis-breath. Once you have traveled more than a few feet from your mother's callused teats, you'll start encountering all kinds of foul and degenerate sub-breeds, aside from the Scots.

[Pim Pendergast]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

I'm looking to have my conceptions challenged.

Well, I was going to tell you about Jesus' miracles and His claims to be God's Son.

Jn 10:38 But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.

Jn 14:11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.

But then I read:

My doubts are in the legitimacy of his claim as the son of God, as well as the legitimacy of his miracles.

You moved the goalposts before I even got a chance. You ask to have your conceptions challenged; you ask for evidence . . . and then you preemptively say you doubt our only evidence -- Jesus' miracles and His claims as described in the Bible. These are the kind of tactics people use when they don't really want to listen.

Well, the burden of proof is on you. If you doubt the accuracy of the Bible, prove that the Bible is inaccurate. Naturally, I doubt the legitimacy of any scientific or historic evidence that seemingly contradicts the Bible.

[Attila's Wife]

Re: Introduction, as per the forum rules

You moved the goalposts before I even got a chance. You ask to have your conceptions challenged; you ask for evidence . . . and then you preemptively say you doubt our only evidence -- Jesus' miracles and His claims as described in the Bible. These are the kind of tactics people use when they don't really want to listen.

Well, the burden of proof is on you. If you doubt the accuracy of the Bible, prove that the Bible is inaccurate. Naturally, I doubt the legitimacy of any scientific or historic evidence that seemingly contradicts the Bible.

Dr Pendergast, our dear Pastor J C Manning has already taken a great deal of time out of his busy schedule and laid down the gauntlet of Truth before Miss Baloney. I would like to think that she is busy trying to respond to his challenge, but fear that she has simply run away, crying.

It is most discouraging. However,

Galatians 6:9 And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.